Dalton Transactions
Paper
(s, 2H), 6.84–6.82 (d, 1H), 6.18 (s, 1H), 2.36 (s, 3H) (Fig. S4 and
S5, ESI†).
To verify the in situ synthesized products, we freshly syn-
thesized and characterized NSA, CM and CM-Zn-CM.
Synthesis of NSA
Synthesis of CMD
NSA was synthesized by the reaction of an equimolar mixture
The synthesis of CMD, 8-((E)-((E)-(4-(diethylamino)-2-hydroxy-
benzylidene)hydrazono)methyl)-7-hydroxy-4-methyl-2H-chromen-
2-one, is shown in Scheme 1. A 2.0 mmol absolute ethanolic
solution of 4-(diethylamino)-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde was
added to a separate equimolar absolute ethanolic solution of
(E)-8-(hydrazonomethyl)-7-hydroxy-4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-
one at room temperature for ∼5 hours. A dark yellow solid was
finally filtered and was dried under vacuum over anhydrous
CaCl2. CMD was characterized through various spectroscopic
of
4-(diethylamino)-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde
and
NH2–
NH2·2H2O according to a method previously reported by our
research group.15a
Spectroscopic characterization data for NSA. IR/cm−1: 2972,
2929, 1628, 1593, 1557, 1515, 1485, 1453, 1414, 1375,
1352, 1300, 1228, 1132, 1080, 1014, 787, 761, 709, 650, 560;
1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, TMS): δ ppm = 1H NMR of
NSA (500 MHz, DMSO-d6, TMS): δ ppm = 11.45 (s, –OH),
8.56 (s, –CvN), 7.24–7.22 (d, 1H), 6.27–6.25 (d, 1H), 6.07
(s, 1H), 3.00–3.00 (q, 4H), 1.08–1.05 (t, 6H). 13C NMR
1
techniques such as IR, H and 13C NMR, and ESI-mass spec-
tral studies along with single crystal XRD analysis (Fig. S6–S9,
ESI†).
(125 MHz, DMSO-d6)
δ ppm = 160.66, 160.64, 150.93,
133.03, 106.40, 104.06, 97.05, 43.87, 12.54. ESI-MS: m/z calcu-
lated for [C22H30N4O2] = 382.24, found = 383.15 (Fig. S13–S16,
ESI†).
Spectroscopic characterization data for receptor CMD. Yield:
70%; M.p. 224–228 °C; IR/cm−1 of CMD: 3441, 2972, 2928,
1736, 1633, 1615, 1514, 1387, 1356, 1293, 1240, 1190, 1165,
1134, 1074, 1052, 936, 897, 844, 773, 705, 651, 595, 458; 1H
NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, TMS): δ ppm = 12.89 (s, –OH), 11.42 (s,
–OH), 9.28 (s, –CH), 8.52 (s, –CH), 7.55–7.53 (d, –1H),
7.12–7.10 (d, –1H), 6.95–6.93 (d, –1H), 6.28–6.26 (d, –1H), 6.24
(s, 1H), 6.15 (s, –H), 3.43–3.38 (q, –4H), 2.42 (s, 3H), 1.23 (t,
6H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm = 164.32, 162.95,
162.21, 160.25, 155.01, 153.55, 153.00, 152.23, 134.18, 127.87,
113.79, 112.07, 111.39, 106.32, 106.23, 104.41, 97.82, 44.66,
18.90, 12.67; ESI-MS: m/z calculated for [C22H23N3O4] = 393.17,
found = 394.3.
Synthesis of CM
The compound CM [((8,8′-((1E,1′E)-hydrazine-1,2-diylidenebis
(methanylylidene))bis(7-hydroxy-4-methyl-2H chromen-2-one))]
was synthesized by the reaction of an equimolar mixture of
previously synthesized ACM-HZ and ACM (8-formyl-7-hydroxy-
4-methyl-coumarin) in ethanol at reflux for six hours
according to a previously reported method.16 CM was syn-
thesized as a yellow precipitate, which was filtered and dried
under vacuum.
Spectroscopic characterization data for CM. Yield: 82%; IR/
cm−1 of ACM-Hz: 3417, 3084, 2960, 1732, 1633, 1620, 1585,
1488, 1436, 1390, 1293, 1220, 1185, 1074, 936, 844, 807, 773,
457; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6, TMS): δ ppm = 12.72 (s,
–OH), 8.40 (s, –CvN), 7.54–7.52 (d, 1H), 7.26 (s, 1H), 6.85–6.83
(d, 1H), 6.17 (s, 1H), 2.35 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (125 MHz,
DMSO-d6) δ ppm = 160.81, 160.02, 154.39, 151.39, 135.76,
125.70, 113.39, 112.21, 110.90, 107.37, 18.76; ESI-MS: m/z cal-
culated for [C22H16N2O6] = 404.10, found = 405.10 (Fig. S17–
S20, ESI†).
Synthesis of single crystals of the complex
Suitable crystals for X-ray diffraction studies of the complex
were developed by slow evaporation of a saturated solution of
CMD and ZnOAc prepared in 2.0 mL of a dimethylsulfoxide :
ethanolic (1 : 1) mixture followed by layering with 1.0 mL di-
chloromethane at room temperature over a period of a few
days. To our surprise, the X-ray diffraction pattern revealed the
existence of two different molecular entities in the crystals.
The first was identified as a new Schiff base in the form of
NSA, while the second was identified as a zinc complex
(CM-Zn-CM′) of yet another in situ synthesized Schiff base,
Synthesis of CM-Zn-CM
CM, by Zn2+-triggered hydrolysis of CMD as well as one of its To a 10 mL ethanolic solution of CM, (0.404 g, 1 mmol),
reaction products with dichloromethane (CM′). This in situ Zn(OAc)2·2H2O (0.676 g, 3 mmol) in ethanol (10 mL) was
restructuring also proves the hydrolysis of CMD in solution added. The yellow solution was then stirred overnight and a
(Scheme S1, ESI†).
yellow precipitate was obtained; this was filtered and washed
Spectroscopic characterization data for CM-Zn-CM′ + NSA. with a cold ethanol–water mixture (1 : 1, v/v) and dried under
IR/cm−1: 3430, 2971, 2929, 1771, 1734, 1630, 1596, 1515, 1454, vacuum.
1411, 1386, 1352, 1300, 1233, 1192, 1132, 1079, 828, 788, 710,
Spectroscopic characterization data for complex CM-Zn-CM.
457; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6, TMS): δ ppm = 11.44 (s, IR/cm−1 of CM-Zn-CM: 3407, 2923, 1732, 1714, 1620, 1584,
–OH), 9.57 (s, –CvN), 8.53 (s, –CvN, 2H), 7.66 (s, 1H), 1526, 1489, 1403, 1330, 1292, 1222, 1187, 1166, 1075, 937, 842,
7.22–7.21 (d, 2H), 6.25–6.23 (d, 2H), 6.048 (s, 1H), 5.96 (s, 1H), 816, 774, 458. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6, TMS): δ ppm =
5.65–5.63 (d, 2H), 4.58 (s, 1H), 3.33–3.30 (t, 4H), 2.46 (s, 3H), 8.46 (s, 1H), 7.49–7.47 (d, 1H), 6.59–6.57 (d, –1H), 5.83 (s, –
1.08–1.05 (q, 6H); ESI-MS: m/z calculated for [C22H30N4O2] = 1H), 1.76 (s, –3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm
382.24, found = 383.24. [C22H14N2O6Zn] = 466.01, found = 174.33, 160.04, 156.55, 130.34, 120.45, 117.15, 114.44, 107.14,
467.18 (Fig. S10–S12, ESI†).
106.87, 105.03, 22.75, 18.908, 18.79 (Fig. S21–S23, ESI†).
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
Dalton Trans.