9
62
A. Meffre et al. / C. R. Chimie 18 (2015) 960–965
ꢀ
2
initiator, AIBN, was recristallized from ether and stored at
[G ] = 10 M) and the initiator, AIBN (1.86 mg,
m
1
13
ꢀ
15 8C. H and C NMR spectra were recorded on an ARX
0.0114 mmol) was added. Three freeze-pump-thaw cycles
were performed. The reaction mixture was stirred at 60 8C
for four days. The solvent was removed in vacuo. The
polymer was precipitated with excess hexane, and dried
3
00 MHz Bruker spectrometer in d -DMSO or CDCl using
6
3
the residual solvent peaks as references. ESI–MS studies
were performed in the positive and negative ion mode
1
using
a
quadrupole mass spectrometer (Micromass,
under vacuum. Conversion: > 95%; yield: 75%. H NMR
Platform II). The samples were continuously introduced
into the mass spectrometer through a Waters 616 HPLC
(DMSO-d6, 300 MHz)
5H, aromatics); 6.61 (bs, 2H, NH2); 5.90–6.30 (bs, 2H, H1 ,
H6); 5.10–5.60 (m, 2H, H2 , H3 ); 4.53 (m, 3H, H4 , H5 ).
d
(ppm) 7.90 (bs, 1H8); 7.10–7.70 (m,
0
0
0
0
0
pump (60 8C; extraction cone voltage: V
powder diffraction measurements were performed with
Cu K radiation at 20 8C using a Philips X’Pert Diffractom-
eter equipped with an Xcelerator detector. The SEM
micrographs were obtained with High-Resolution
Transmission Electron Microscopy (HRTEM) JEOL
c
= 30 V). X-ray
a
2.1.3.2. Synthesis in the presence of alkali cations. Gm
(50 mg, 0.114 mmol) was dissolved in THF freshly distilled
ꢀ2
a
(11 ml, [Gm] = 10 M); KCF SO 8:1 mol:mmol and then
3 3
the initiator, AIBN (1.86 mg, 0.0114 mmol), were added.
Three freeze–pump–thaw cycles were performed. The
reaction mixture was stirred at 60 8C for two days. The
solvent was removed in vacuo. The polymer was precipi-
tated with excess hexane, and dried under vacuum.
Conversion: > 95%; yield: 75%.
2
010 FEG apparatus, working with an accelerating voltage
˚
of 200 kV and a point resolution of 2.0 A.
0 0
.1.1. 2 ,3 -O-Benzylidene guanosine
2
0
0
1
The precursor, 2 ,3 -O-benzylidene guanosine was
6
H NMR (DMSO-d ,
prepared according to the reported procedures [16]. Gua-
nosine (5 g, 17.65 mmol) was suspended in benzalde-
3
00 MHz):
d
(ppm) 7.90 (bs, 1H8); 7.10–7.70 (m, 5H,
0
aromatics); 6.61 (bs, 2H, NH2); 5.90–6.30 (bs, 2H, H1 , H6);
5
hyde (50 ml). An excess of ZnCl
2
(13.25 g; 97.18 mmol)
0
0
0
0
.10–5.60 (m, 2H, H2 , H3 ); 4.53 (m, 3H, H4 , H5 ).
was added. After stirring at room temperature for one
night, the reaction mixture was washed with ether and
cold water. The crude solid was recrystallized from an
3. Results and discussion
ethanol/water (3:1) mixture to give a yellow product.
3
.1. Design of hybrid molecular components
1
Yield: 84%. H NMR (d
6
-DMSO, 300 MHz)
); 7.48-7.31 (m, 5H,
); 6.11 et 5.85 (2s, 1H, H );
); 5.25 (m, 1H, H ); 5.05 (m, 2H, H , OH);
); 3.55 (m, 2H, H ).
d (ppm) 10.65
0
0
0
(
s, 1H, NH); 7, 90 et 7.85 (2s, 1H, H
7
5 -Methacrylate-2 ,3 -O-benzylidene-guanosine, Gm,
has been prepared in two steps:
aromatics); 6.45 (s, 2H, NH
2
6
6
.02 (2d, 1H, H
1
0
2
0
0
3
4
.20 (m, 1H, H
4
0
5
0
ꢁ
ꢁ
furanose protection with benzaldehyde leading to acetal
G* as an equimolar diastereisomeric mixture [16],
followed by;
a reaction with methacryloyl chloride to afford the
compound Gm as a white powder.
0
0
0
2
.1.2. 5 -Methacrylate-2 ,3 -O-benzylid e` ne-guanosine, G
2
m
0
0
,3 -O-Benzylid e` ne-guanosine (2.3 g, 6.73 mmol) was
dissolved in anhydrous DMF (60 ml). Three equivalents
of triethylamine (2.04 g, 20.20 mmol), DMAP (0.41 g,
3
.37 mmol) and methacryloyl chloride (0.98 g, 9.42 mmol)
were successively added. The mixture was stirred at room
temperature for one night. The solvent was removed in
vacuo, and the residue treated with chloroform (30 ml) and
water (60 ml). The organic layers were separated, dried
1
13
The H, C NMR, ESI-MS spectra are in agreement with
the proposed formula. The generation of G-quartet
architectures can be achieved by using mixtures of Gm,
potassium triflate, and KTf in different molar ratios (Fig. 1).
4
(MgSO ) and evaporated in vacuo. The resulting mixture
was purified by silica gel column chromatography (10%
3.2. Generation of G-quartet architectures in solution
methanol in chloroform) to give the product as a yellow
1
solid. Yield: 56%. H NMR (d
6
-DMSO, 300 MHz):
); 7.57–7.42 (m,
); 6.20 (2s, 1H, H ); 6.08
); 6.14 et 5.68 (2s, 2H, CH =); 5.42 (m, 1H, H );
.32 (m, 1H, H ); 4.53 (m, 1H, H ); 4.48 (m, 2H, H ); 1.86
, 300 MHz) (ppm) 166.30
16); 156.75 (C11); 153.78 (C10); 150.54 et 150.45 (C
45.97 et 145.39 (C17); 136.01 (C
15); 128.40 (C13); 126.97 (C14); 126.31 (C18); 117.04 (C
06.73 et 103.09 (C ); 88.19 (C ); 84.78 et 84.27 (C
); 81.87 et 81.59 (C ); 64.75 et 64.50 (C ); 17.95 (C19).
ESI–MS (30 V, ESI–MS, CH CN) m/z = 440.53 [M + H] .
d
(ppm)
The formation of H-bonded self-assembled architectu-
1
1
5
0.80 (bs, 1H, NH); 7.89 et 7.87 (2s, 1H, H
H, aromatics); 6.61 (bs, 2H, NH
7
res of Gm has been studied in solution by H NMR
1
2
6
spectroscopy and ESI-MS spectrometry. The H NMR
(2d, 1H, H
1
0
2
2
0
spectrum of Gm in DMSO-d6 shows well-defined sharp
signals, mostly indicative of the presence of monomeric
5
3
3
0
4
0
5
0
1
(2s, 3H, CH
3
). C NMR (DMSO-d
6
d
3
species in solution. In CDCl , the peaks broaden, indicating
(C
9
);
);
a dynamic equilibrium. These fast exchanges at the NMR
time scale are considerably slowed down by lowering the
temperature (up to –50 8C), when three sets of signals at d
12.25, 12.38, 12.48 ppm, showing N–H and NH2 cross-
peaks (Fig. 2a), reminiscent of a slow exchange between H-
bonded interdigitated ribbons A and B and G-quartets
1
7
); 135.50 (C12); 129.80
(C
8
1
6
1
2
); 83.11
(C
3
4
5
+
3
(
Fig. 1), as previously observed [17].
The addition of the KTf (K : Gm 1:8, mol: mol) to a
+
2.1.3. Polymerization procedures
1
CDCl
3
solution of Gm causes significant changes in the H
2
.1.3.1. Synthesis in the absence of alkali cations. G
.114 mmol) was dissolved in THF freshly distilled (11 ml,
m
(50 mg,
NMR spectrum (Fig. 2b–d). At 25 8C, the latter shows two
peaks for the N–H proton: one sharp peak at 12.7 ppm and
0