M.J. Climent et al. / Journal of Catalysis 225 (2004) 316–326
325
Table 8
surface area, not only changes the total number of the basic
sites exposed to reactants, but also increases the fraction of
the stronger ones. These correspond to O2− located in cor-
ners of the crystals. Then, the smaller the crystal size the
larger the fraction of the above sites, and the larger the to-
tal number of the exposed sites. This agrees very well with
the fact the regenerated hydrotalcites show a larger amount
of accessible Brønsted basic sites for samples with a higher
surface area. Using this rehydrated material it is possible
to obtain yields of pseudoionones of 96% with 99% of se-
lectivity, in 15 min of reaction time working at a very low
acetone/citral molar ratio. This result is superior to any re-
ported up to now for this condensation in homogeneous and
heterogeneous phases.
Results of aldol condensation between citral and acetone in the presence of
hydrotalcite sample (HTc
) using different percentages of water added
US298
3
Water added
(%)
Yield 3, 15 min
Selectivity 3
r
×10
0
−1
−1
)
(%)
(%)
(mol g min
0
20
36
46
0.71
0.87
1.00
0.88
69
83
96
84
88
97
99
98
Reaction conditions: acetone (18.2 mmol), citral (6.5 mmol), 414 mg of
catalyst, at 333 K.
water on hydrotalcite should shift the reaction equilibrium
toward the formation of the reactants. According to this, the
condensation reaction between citral and acetone was per-
formed adding on the calcined hydrotalcite (HTcUS298) at
different percentages of water with respect to the solid cata-
lyst (20, 36, and 46% (wt/wt)). In Table 8 it can be seen that
the calcined hydrotalcite was less active than the rehydrated
samples and a maximum of activity was found when the con-
densation was carried out using freshly calcined hydrotalcite
with 36% (wt/wt) of water added of. It is very interesting to
note, that the optimized rehydrated sample reached yields of
pseudoionones of 96% with 99% of selectivity in 15 min of
reaction time, working at a very low acetone/citral molar ra-
tio. This result is superior to any reported up to now for this
condensation in a homogeneous and heterogeneous phase.
Acknowledgment
Financial support of the Spanish Ministry of Science and
Technology (MAT2003-079-45-CO2-01) is acknowledged.
References
[1] F. Cavani, F. Trifiro, A. Vaccari, Catal. Today 11 (1991) 173.
[2] R. Allmann, Chimia 24 (1970) 99.
[3] S. Miyata, Clays Clay Miner. 28 (1980) 50.
[4] W.T. Reichle, S.Y. Kang, D.S. Everhardt, J. Catal. 101 (1986) 352.
[5] H.F.W. Taylor, Miner. Mag. 37 (1969) 338.
[6] J. Valente, F. Figueras, M. Gravelle, P. Kumbhar, L. Lopez, J.P. Besse,
J. Catal. 189 (2000) 370.
4. Conclusions
[7] D. Tichit, M.H. Lhouty, A. Guida, B.H. Chiche, F. Figueras, A. Aroux,
D. Bartalini, E. Garrone, J. Catal. 151 (1995) 50.
It has been shown that during the synthesis of Mg–Al
LDH, the increase of temperature during the coprecipita-
tion step with and without simultaneous sonication (HTT and
HTUS series, respectively) or during the ageing step of the
gels under microwave irradiation (HTMW series) causes an
increase of the crystal size.
[8] D.M.P. Mingos, D.R. Baghurst, Chem. Soc. Rev. 20 (1991) 1.
[9] S. Komarneni, R. Roy, Q.H. Li, Mater. Res. Bull. 27 (1992) 1393.
[10] S. Komarneni, R. Roy, Q.H. Li, J. Mater. Chem. 4 (1994) 1903.
[11] S. Komarneni, R. Roy, Q.H. Li, J. Mater. Res. 11 (1996) 1866.
[12] S. Möhmel, I. Kurzawski, D. Uecker, D. Müller, W. Gebner, Cryst.
Res. Technol. 37 (2002) 359.
[13] S. Kannan, R.V. Jasra, J. Mater. Chem. 10 (10) (2000) 2311.
[14] G. Fetter, F. Hernández, A.M. Maubert, V.H. Lara, P. Bosch, J. Porous
Mat. 4 (1997) 27;
G. Fetter, P. Bosch, F.A. Hernandez, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 454
(1997) 235.
[15] D. Tichit, A. Rolland, F. Prinetto, G. Fetter, M.J. Martinez-Ortiz,
M.A. Valenzuela, P. Bosch, J. Mater. Chem. 12 (2002) 3832.
[16] Y. Fang, D.K. Agrawal, D.M. Roy, P.W. Brown, J. Mater. Res. 7 (1992)
2294.
[17] J.S. Hu, K.K. Agrawa, Y. Fang, R. Roy, J. Mater. Sci. 28 (1993) 5297.
[18] N. Enomoto, H.L. Choi, M. Katsumoto, Z. Nakagawa, Trans. Mater.
Res. Soc. Jpn. 14A (1994) 777.
[19] A.P. Kapustin, in: Effect of Ultrasounds on the Kinetics of Crystalliza-
tion, Consultants Bureau, New York, 1963, p. 65.
[20] Y. Seida, Y. Nakano, Y. Nakamura, Clays Clay Miner. 50 (2002) 525.
[21] B.F. Sels, D.E. De Vos, P.A. Jacobs, Catal. Rev. 43 (2001) 443.
[22] JCPDS X-ray Powder Diffraction File No. 22-700, 1986.
[23] F. Rey, V. Fornes, J.M. Rojo, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 88 (1992)
2233.
[24] (a) K.S. Suslick, Adv. Organomet. Chem. 25 (1986) 73;
(b) K.S. Suslick, Modern Synth. Methods 4 (1986) 1.
[25] W. Lauterborn, W. Hentschel, Ultrasonics 24 (1985) 59.
[26] K.S. Suslick, D.J. Casadonte, M.L.H. Green, M. Thompson, Ultrason-
ics 25 (1987) 56.
It has been found that the sample prepared under son-
ication at 298 K (HTUS298) compared with samples of
other series presents a homogeneous morphology and highly
dispersed particles with an average size of 80 nm. The
larger surface area presented by the mixed oxide derivative
(HTcUS298) (20% larger than that of the mixed oxide conven-
tionally synthesized) not only could be due to the fact that
ultrasounds accelerate the crystal formation, but also to the
dispersion of small groups of layers and decreasing agglom-
eration during the nucleation and crystal growing process,
affording crystals with smaller sizes than those obtained by
a conventional ageing method. We have shown that mixed
oxides derived from hydrotalcites synthesized by using ul-
trasound have improved considerably the surface area of the
calcined hydrotalcite, as well as the number of the accessible
active sites.
The corresponding mixed oxides obtained by calcina-
tion of the hydrotalcites prepared with ultrasound present a
higher specific activity for Knoevenagel and aldol conden-
sations. This was explained by assuming that the increase in