Reactions of the Peroxo Intermediates of sMMO Hydroxylase
A R T I C L E S
Scheme 1
functional theoretical calculations, which accounts for many of
the observed reactions of MMOH.12,13 The calculations re-
veal that Q reacts by two sequential single-electron transfer
events.12,13
Although the reactivity of Q has been extensively probed,
that of Hperoxo has not been fully explored. Early indications
of multiple oxidizing intermediates in sMMO arose from
“peroxide shunt” reactions, in which Hox is activated by
hydrogen peroxide in the absence of MMOB.14 Different product
distributions are obtained for these reactions compared to those
employing the complete sMMO enzyme system. The greatest
difference occurs for reactions with trans-2-butene, where the
product distribution for the wild-type system revealed 68%
alcohol, whereas the peroxide shunt reaction afforded 97%
epoxide.14 This difference could arise from an increase in the
activity of the peroxo intermediate compared to that of Q. In
addition, sMMO reactions with radical clock substrate probes15
yield products derived from a cationic intermediate, which were
postulated to arise from reaction of a hydroperoxo species with
substrate.12
that converts methane to methanol in methanotrophic bacteria,
is unique among wild-type carboxylate-bridged diiron proteins,
in that both (peroxo)diiron(III) (Hperoxo) and high-valent di(µ-
oxo)diiron(IV) (Q) intermediates have sufficiently long lifetimes
and extinction coefficients to be followed by stopped-flow
optical spectroscopy.7 Thus, sMMO is well suited for studying
the role of multiple oxidants in a biological system.
sMMO isolated from Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath) (Mc)
and Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b (Mt) have been exten-
sively investigated. Substrate hydroxylation occurs at a car-
boxylate-bridged diiron center residing in the R subunit of the
hydroxylase protein MMOH, a 251 kDa R2â2γ2 heterodimer.
In addition to MMOH, two other proteins are required for
activity in vitro, a 38.5 kDa reductase MMOR, which receives
electrons from NADH and then transfers them to MMOH, and
a 16 kDa regulatory protein MMOB necessary for efficient
catalysis.7 A range of spectroscopic techniques revealed the
existence of intermediates in the reaction of reduced MMOH
(Hred) with dioxygen in the presence of 2 equiv of MMOB
(Scheme 1).7 The first observable intermediate is Hperoxo, which
converts rapidly to Q. In the absence of substrates, Q slowly
decays to afford oxidized protein (Hox).
The first direct evidence for Hperoxo reactivity arose from a
stopped-flow optical spectroscopic study carried out in our
laboratory, which revealed the decay rate of the peroxo
intermediate to increase when exposed to increasing concentra-
tions of propylene.16 The data covered only a small range of
substrate concentration because of the limited solubility of
propylene in water, and the differences in the observed rate
constants are not large. Using protein isolated from Mt, others
17
failed to observe reactions of propylene with Hperoxo and
suggested that substrate might increase the rate of Q formation.
At the low protein and substrate concentrations used in their
study, however, the rate constants for reaction with Hperoxo would
be lower or near the value of peroxo conversion to Q, and
consequently, that reaction could not be observed. In addition,
they monitored the absorbance change near 420 nm, whereas it
is essential to follow reactions of Hperoxo at its absorption
maximum of 720 nm to avoid interference from Q.
Studies of MMOH reactions with substrates other than
methane provide valuable information for understanding the
hydroxylation mechanism. Reactions employing isotopically
labeled substrates allow for the determination of kinetic isotope
effects (KIEs), the magnitude of which gives information about
the transition state.8-10 The reactions of Q with CH4, CH3CN,
and nitromethane exhibit KIEs larger than the theoretical limit
for classical mechanisms,8,9,11 indicating that C-H bond break-
ing occurs by tunneling at the transition state and is rate-limiting
for these reactions. For larger substrates, the KIE approaches
1, and it is postulated that substrate binding or product release
becomes rate-limiting.9-11 Reactions with radical clock substrate
probes demonstrate that a discrete radical is not involved in
the hydroxylation mechanism.12 These experimental results,
when coupled with recent theoretical studies, have allowed a
detailed mechanism to be postulated, based on combined
semiclassical molecular dynamics simulations and density
To provide a more definitive assessment of the relative
reactivity of the MMOH intermediates with substrates, we have
investigated the reactions of ethyl vinyl ether and diethyl ether
by single- and double-mixing stopped-flow optical spectroscopy.
(13) (a) Gherman, B. F.; Dunietz, B. D.; Whittington, D. A.; Lippard, S. J.;
Friesner, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3836-3837. (b) Guallar, V.;
Gherman, B. F.; Lippard, S. J.; Friesner, R. A. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
2002, 6, 236-242. (c) Guallar, V.; Gherman, B. F.; Miller, W. H.; Lippard,
S. J.; Friesner, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3377-3384. (d) Baik,
M.-H.; Gherman, B. F.; Friesner, R. A.; Lippard, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 14608-14615. (e) Gherman, B. F.; Baik, M.-H.; Lippard, S.
J.; Friesner, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2978-2990. (f) Gherman,
B. F.; Lippard, S. J.; Friesner, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1025-
1037.
(14) (a) Andersson, K. K.; Froland, W. A.; Lee, S.-K.; Lipscomb, J. D. New J.
Chem. 1991, 15, 411-415. (b) Jiang, Y.; Wilkins, P. C.; Dalton, H. Biochim.
Biophys. Acta 1993, 1163, 105-112.
(15) Selected references: (a) Dalton, H.; Golding, B. T.; Waters, B. W.; Higgins,
R.; Taylor, J. A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1981, 482-483. (b)
Ruzicka, F.; Huang, D.-S.; Donnelly, M. I.; Frey, P. A. Biochemistry 1990,
29, 1696-1700. (c) Liu, K. E.; Johnson, C. C.; Newcomb, M.; Lippard, S.
J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 939-947. (d) Valentine, A. M.; LeTadic-
Biadatti, M.-H.; Toy, P. H.; Newcomb, M.; Lippard, S. J. J. Biol. Chem.
1999, 274, 10771-10776. (e) Choi, S.-Y.; Eaton, P. E.; Kopp, D. A.;
Lippard, S. J.; Newcomb, M.; Shen, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
12198-12199. (f) Jin, Y.; Lipscomb, J. D. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 6178-
6186. (g) Jin, Y.; Lipscomb, J. D. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1543,
47-59. (h) Newcomb, M.; Shen, R.; Lu, Y.; Coon, M. J.; Hollenberg, P.
F.; Kopp, D. A.; Lippard, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6879-6886.
(16) Valentine, A. M.; Stahl, S. S.; Lippard, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
3876-3887.
(7) Merkx, M.; Kopp, D. A.; Sazinsky, M. H.; Blazyk, J. L.; Mu¨ller, J.; Lippard,
S. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2782-2807 and references therein.
(8) Green, J.; Dalton, H. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 17698-17703.
(9) Nesheim, J. C.; Lipscomb, J. D. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 10240-10247.
(10) Brazeau, B. J.; Lipscomb, J. D. Int. Congr. Ser. 2002, 1233, 229-233.
(11) Ambundo, E. A.; Friesner, R. A.; Lippard, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 8770-8771.
(12) Baik, M.-H.; Newcomb, M.; Friesner, R. A.; Lippard, S. J. Chem. ReV.
2003, 103, 2385-2419.
(17) Brazeau, B. J.; Lipscomb, J. D. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 13503-13515.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 20, 2005 7371