Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 6 of 7
3. Conclusions
REFERENCES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1. Ringe, D.; Petsko, G. A. Science 2008, 320, 1428.
2. Reek, J. N. H.; Meeuwissen, J. Nature Chem. 2010, 2, 615.
3. Mallat, T.; Orglmeister, E.; Baiker, A. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107,
4863.
4. Kyriakou, G.; Beaumont, S. K.; R. M. Lambert Langmuir 2011,
27, 9687.
Diastereoselective and enantioselective heterogeneous Au
catalysts for cyclopropanation reactions have been developed
by immobilization of chiral SAM on the surface of mesopo-
rous SiO2 support. Complexation of Au ions within the SAM,
enabled the formation of Au clusters that are encapsulated in
the chiral SAM. The Au@SAM/MCF-17 catalyst was activated
through metal oxidation by PhICl2. Under these conditions,
Au@diproline/MCF-17 catalyzed intermolecular and intra-
molecular cyclopropanation reactions with up to 51% and
30% enantiomeric excess, respectively. In the case of the in-
termolecular cyclopropanation reaction, the enantioselectivi-
ty was coupled with high diastereoselectivity. NEXAFS analy-
sis indicated that highly oxidized Au(III) species are the ac-
tive species in this reaction. Spectroscopic analysis of the
SAM/MCF-17 revealed that as the number of amino acids in
the molecules that construct the SAM is increased above one,
the SAM is stabilized due to the formation of hydrogen-
bonding network. The intermolecular and intramolecular
hydrogen bonding of the SAM favors specific alignment of
the reactant as it approaches through the SAM to the catalyt-
ically active Au ions.
5. Han, D.; Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Z.; Li, J.; Li, C. J. Catal. 2006,
243, 318.
6. Smejkal, T.; Breit, B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 311.
7. Gustafson J. L.; Lim, D.; Miller, S. J. Science 2010, 328, 1251.
8. Uraguchi, D. ; Ueki, Y. ; Ooi, T. Science 2009, 329, 120.
9. Breit,B; Seiche W. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1640.
10. Milo, A.; Neumann, R. Chem. Comm. 2011, 47, 2535.
11. Cortial, G.; Goettmann, F.; Mercier, F.; Le-Floch, P. and
Sanchez, C. Catalysis Comm. 2007, 8, 215.
12. Datta, K. K. R.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Ariga, K.; Vinu, A. Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 5961.
13. Wu, B.; Huang, H.; Yang, J.; Zheng, N.; Fu, G. Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 3440.
14. Marshall, S. T.; O’Brien, M.; Oetter, B.; Corpuz, A.; Richards,
R. M.; Schwartz, D. K.; Medlin, J. W. Nature Mater. 2010, 9, 853.
15. Gross, E.; Liu. J. H.; Toste, F. D.; Somorjai,G. A. Nature Chem.
2012, 4, 947.
16. Gross, E.; Krier, J. M.; Heinke, L.; Somorjai, G. A. Top. Catal.
2012, 55, 13.
17. Li, Y. M.; Liu, J. H. C.; Witham, C. A.; Huang, W. Y.; Marcus,
M.; A. Fakra, S. C.; Alayoglu, P.; Zhu, Z. W.; Thompson, C. M.;
Arjun, A.; Lee, K.; Gross, E.; Toste, F. D.; Somorjai, G. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 13527.
18. Tsung, C. K.; Khun, J. N.; Huang, W. Y.; Aliaga, C.; Hung, L.;
Somorjai, G. A.; Yang, P. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 5816.
19. Climent, M. J. ; Corma, A. ; Iborra, S. ; Navarro, M. C. ; Primo,
J. J. Catal. 1996, 161, 783.
20. Borodko, Y.; Thompson, C. M.; Huang, W. Y.; Yildiz, H. B.;
Frei, H.; Somorjai, G. A. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2011, 115, 4757.
21. Borodko, Y.; Habas, S. E.; Koebel, M.; Yang, P. D.; Frei, H.;
Somorjai, G. A. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006, 110, 23052.
22. Johansson, M. J.; Gorin, D. J.; Staben, S. T.; Toste, F. D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 18002.
23. Huang, W. Y.; Liu, J. H. C.; Alayoglu, P.; Li, Y.; Witham, C. A.;
Tsung, C. K.; Toste, F. D.; Somorjai, G. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010,
132, 16771.
24. Witham, C. A.; Huang, W. Y.; Tsung, C. K.; Kuhn, J. N.; So-
morjai, G. A. and Toste, F. D. Nature Chem. 2010, 2, 36.
25. Watson, I. D. G.; Ritter, S.; Toste, D. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2009, 131, 2056.
26. Gazit, O. M.; Katz, A. Langmuir 2012, 28, 431.
27. Fabris, L.; Antonello, S.; Armelao, L.; Donkers, R. L.; Polo, F.;
Toniolo, C.; Maran, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 326.
28. Bertilsson, L.; Liedberg, B. Langmuir 1993, 9, 141.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
These results demonstrate the advantages of mesoscale cata-
lysts that assemble together two different building blocks for
the formation of an architecturally designed catalyst. In this
case, the combination of metallic catalyst and chiral SAM
matrix, enabled the preparation of reactive and enantioselec-
tive heterogeneous catalysts. Unlike other asymmetric heter-
ogeneous catalysts, in which ligand-reactants interactions are
needed for asymmetric reactions, by using the chiral SAM,
the enantioselectivity is enhanced due to the chirality of the
matrix in which the catalyst is embedded. It should be noted
that in this study only few chiral molecule were tested for the
formation of SAM as an initial proof of concept for employ-
ing this system for asymmetric reactions. Preparation of SAM
with other homopeptide or heteropeptide may lead to better
catalytic reactivity and selectivity. The use of robotic system
for the preparation of a library of peptides is planned in or-
der to gain a better scope of the SAM-based mesoscale cata-
lyst.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
Supporting Information. Details of the experimental pro-
cedure, spectroscopic and microscopic data. This material is
available free of charge via the Internet at
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Authors
* F. D. Toste, fdtoste@berkeley.edu ;
G. A. Somorjai, somorjai@berkeley.edu
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We acknowledge support from the Director, Office of
Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of
Chemical Sciences, Geological and Biosciences of the US
DOE under contract DE-AC02-05CH11231.
6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment