effect on the yields (4b and 4c). When the methyl group was
replaced with phenyl group, the corresponding product 4f was
obtained in 91% yield (4f). The aryl, heteroaryl, and aliphatic
substituted ynals were also tested, and the results implied that
this annulation approach can be effective for the 2-pyridone
library (4g-i). It is noteworthy that the alkyl substituted β-keto
amide was also compatible under the standard conditions (4j-l).
The reaction yield decreased to 53% when para acetyl
substituted ynal was applied (4k). To our delighted, the reaction
could be performed on a gram scale, delivered the product in
good yield (4a).
In conclusion, we have developed a convenient and highly
efficient annulation reaction of β-keto amides and ynals.14
A
series of 2-pyridones bearing various functional groups were
obtained in good to excellent yields through a tandem Michael
addition and dehydration process. The merits of this
transformation include transition-metal-free conditions, readily
available reagents, complete regioselectivity, simple operation,
etc. It is noteworthy that water is the only byproduct in this
transformation. Moreover, the conjugated enyneamides were
formed from β-cyano amides and ynals via a nucleophilic 1,2-
addition. Further studies to extend synthetic applications and
detailed mechanism are currently underway in our laboratory.
When the β-keto amide substrates were replaced with β-cyano
amides, and examined the reaction with ynals under the standard
conditions (Scheme 4). To our surprise, the reaction did not form
any products. Interestingly, after some attempts, we found that
the intermolecular dehydration products were produced as a
single regioisomer without the addition of K2CO3. Following the
above results, four examples of conjugated enyneamide synthesis
were demonstrated. Both primary, secondary amides and
aromatic, aliphatic ynals were compatible, and underwent
smoothly to lead to the corresponding products in excellent
yields (5a-d).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the NSF of Jiangxi Province
(20171ACB21048) and the NSF of Jiangxi Provincial Education
Department (GJJ180756) for financial support.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found,
Scheme 4. The Intermolecular Dehydration of β-Cyano
§
Contribute equally.
Amides and Ynalsa
Corresponding author. Tel: +86 797 8393670; fax: +86 797
8393670; e-mail address:chenzwang@126.com (Z. Chen)
References
a Reaction conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.2 mmol) in THF (1.0 mL) at 65 °C
1
2
Torres, M.; Gil, S.; Parra, M. Curr. Org. Chem. 2005, 9, 1757-1779.
for 10 h; Isolated yield.
(a) Prendergast, A. M.; Pardo, L. M.; Fairlamb, I. J. S.; McGlacken, G. P.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 5119-5124. (b) Gao, B.; Sun, Y.; Wang, J.;
Yuan, Z.; Zu, L.; Zhang, X.; Liu, W. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 33625-33630. (c)
Poudel, T. N.; Lee, Y. R.; Kim, S. H. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 4579-4586.
(d) Yan, W.; Huang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Cao, S.; Tong, L.; Zhang, T.; Wang,
C.; Zhou, L.; Ding, J.; Luo, C.; Zhou, J.; Xie, H.; Duan, W. Chem. Bio.
Drug Des. 2016, 87, 694-703.
On the basis of previous reports and our experimental results, a
possible mechanism was depicted in Scheme 5.
Phenylpropiolaldehyde 2a underwent nucleophilic 1,2-addition
with β-cyano amide to forms intermediate A, which gave the
conjugated enyneamide product via a dehydration process. On
the other hand, the Michael addition of 2a with β-keto amide
yielded intermediate B. then a proton transfer generated
intermediate C. Finally, the desired product 3a was formed via
the nucleophilic addition and dehydration of C with the aid of
base. It suggested that the PKa of the active methylene was
essential for the 1,2-addition and 1,4-addition.
3
4
(a) Falb, E.; Ulanenko, K.; Tor, A.; Gottesfeld, R.; Weitman, M.; Afri,
M.; Gottlieb, H.; Hassner, A. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 5046-5053. (b)
Jung, S.-H.; Sung, D.-B.; Park, C.-H.; Kim, W.-S. J. Org. Chem. 2016,
81, 7717-7724. (c) Luo, B.; Zhang, Y.; You, Y.; Weng, Z. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2016, 14, 8615-8622. (d) Altman, R. A.; Buchwald, S. L. Org.
Lett. 2007, 9, 643-646.
Scheme 5. Proposed reaction mechanism
(a) Fujii, M.; Nishimura, T.; Koshiba, T.; Yokoshima, S.; Fukuyama, T.
Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 232-234. (b) Bai, H.; Sun, R.; Liu, S.; Yang, L.;
Chen, X.; Huang, C. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 12535-12548. (c) Jessen,
H. J.; Schumacher, A.; Shaw, T.; Pfaltz, A.; Gademann, K. Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 4222-4226. (d) Zhang, Q.; Liu, X.; Xin, X.;
Zhang, R.; Liang, Y.; Dong, D. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 15378-15380.
(e) Chikhalikar, S.; Bhawe, V.; Ghotekar, B.; Jachak, M.; Ghagare, M. J.
Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 3829-3836. (f) Chong, Q.; Xin, X.; Wang, C.; Wu,
F.; Wan, B. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 21222-21226. (g) Wang, X.-W.; Cui, H.-
F.; Wang, H.-F.; Yang, Y.-Q.; Zhao, G.; Zhu, S.-Z. Tetrahedron 2011,
67, 2468-2473. (h) Yavari, I.; Bayat, M. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52,
6649-6651.