S.M. Vahdat et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters 22 (2011) 543–546
545
2H, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.60 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): d 50.1, 114.7, 118.2, 121.1, 129.1, 129.9,
131.1, 132.6, 136.1, 144.8. (Scheme 1, entry 3): 1H NMR: (500 MHz, CDCl3): d 3.9 (br s, 1H), 5.08 (d, 1H, J = 5 Hz),
6.3 (dd, 1H, J = 5 Hz, 5.5 Hz), 6.7 (d, 1H, J = 5.5 Hz), 6.9–7.1 (m, 3H), 7.0–7.4 (m, 7H). 13C NMR (125 MHz,
CDCl3): d 44.4, 105.6, 110.9, 114.5, 116.5, 119.2, 120.6, 129.5, 130.1, 143.9, 144.1, 146.1. (Scheme 1, entry 4): 1H
NMR: (500 MHz, CDCl3): d 1.20–1.27 (m, 5H), 1.67–2.62 (m, 5H), 3.79 (br s, NH), 4.05 (d, 1H, J = 6Hz), 6.71–6.92
(m, 3H), 7.22–7.27 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): d 25.7, 25.9, 29.6, 40.6, 51.7, 114.1, 118.8, 119.8, 129.5,
145.2. (Scheme 1, entry 5): 1H NMR: (500 MHz, CDCl3): d 4.29 (br s, NH), 5.53 (s, H), 6.48–6.99 (m, 4H), 7.21–7.53
(m, 4H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): d 44.1, 109.6, 110.9, 114.5, 116.6, 120.6, 129.7, 144.1, 144.3, 146.2. (Scheme
1, entry 10): 1H NMR: (500 MHz, CDCl3): d 2.20 (br s, NH), 4.00 (dd, 2H, J = 13Hz), 4.89 (s, 1H), 7.37–7.93 (m,
10H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): 51.1, 53.2, 118.6, 127.1, 128.2, 128.3, 128.4, 128.5, 128.8, 134.1, 138.4. (Scheme
1, entry 17): 1H NMR: (500 MHz, CDCl3): d 3.4 (d, 2H, J = 13.5Hz), 3.8 (d, 2H, J = 13Hz), 4.91 (s, 1H), 7.26–7.60 (m,
15H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): d 54.8, 57.1, 115.2, 127.1, 127.5, 128.1, 128.3, 128.4, 128.5, 128.6, 128.7, 128.8,
133.8, 137.5. (Scheme 1, entry 19): 1H NMR: (500 MHz, CDCl3): d 1.30–2.33 (m, 10H), 3.86 (br s, NH), 6.89–7.27
(m, 5H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): 22.1, 24.6, 36.2, 54.1, 114.9, 117.1, 121.1, 128.9, 143.6. (Scheme 1, entry 20):
1H NMR: (500 MHz, CDCl3): d 1.71–2.37 (m, 8H), 4.05 (br s, NH), 6.70–7.34 (m, 5H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3):
d 23.7, 40.1, 57.5, 115.6, 119.7, 122.4, 129.3, 144.3.
2. Results and discussion
In the presence of 10 mol% of oxalic acid, the three component coupling reaction involving benzaldehyde, aniline
and TMSCN successively proceeded smoothly at 50–60 8C to afford the corresponding a-aminonitrile derivative in
97% yield. The new methodology allowed us to prepare the a-aminonitriles shown in Scheme 1. After this success,
reactions of several aldehydes (aliphatic, aromatic, heterocyclic, and conjugated) [21], amines (primary and
secondary), and TMSCN were examined in the presence of 10 mol% oxalic acid under solvent-free conditions. This
method is equally effective with electron-withdrawing 4-chlorobenzaldehyde and 4-chloroaniline. This method is also
effective with ketones and aliphatic aldehydes, which normally produce low yields due to their intrinsic lower
reactivity. The reaction using solid amines, such as 4-chloroaniline and 4-bromoaniline, gave corresponding a-
aminonitriles exclusively under the reaction conditions described. Thus, acetophenone gave a 90% of 17 and 4-
chloroaniline afforded a-aminonitrile 7 (Scheme 1) in 90% yield. In all cases, no undesired side products such as
cyanohydrins are obtained under these conditions. We believe that this is mainly due to the rapid formation and
activation of the imines catalyzed by oxalic acid. Although the amount of catalyst has been optimized to 10 mol%,
lesser amounts (5 mol%) also worked with longer reaction times.
3. Conclusions
In summary, this new protocol represents a safer, simpler and more environmentally friendly alternative to the usual
classical Strecker conditions, avoiding the use of expensive and/or toxic Lewis acids and therefore permitting the use
of substrates sensitive to Lewis acid conditions. The purification of products after the usual work-up was in some cases
unnecessary.
Acknowledgment
This research is supported by the Islamic Azad University, Ayatollah Amoli Branch.
References
[1] For selected early examples of organocatalysis, see:
(a) G. Lelais, D.W.C. MacMillan, in: K. Mikami, M. Lautens (Eds.), Frontiers in Asymmetric Catalysis, Wiley, New York, 2007;
(b) S.M. Baghbanian, S. Khaksar, et al. Chin. Chem. Lett. 21 (2010) 563;
(c) S. Connon, J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 5 (2007) 3407;
(d) B. List, Chem. Commun. (2006) 819.
[2] For excellent reviews see:
(a) P.I. Dalko, L. Moisan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 40 (2001) 3726;