L.S. Prabhumirashi, J.K. Khoje / Thermochimica Acta 383 12002) 109±118
117
strength as compared to that of the acetate grouping in
5. Summary and conclusions
the tmn complex of CuꢀII) acetate. The temperature
corresponding to the loss of the oxalate group from
Cuꢀtmn)ꢀCOO)2Á0.5H2O is lower than that in Cuꢀen)2-
ꢀCOO)2Á1.5H2O, both of which are lower than that for
CuꢀII) oxalate [43]. The lower decomposition tempera-
tures in case of complexed CuꢀII) oxalate than that for
the uncomplexed one is attributable to weakening of
the co-ordination of an oxalate anion in the former due
to co-ordination by the ligands with the central metal
ion. Similarly, in case of en complexes of CuꢀII) salts of
inorganic anions; the larger Eas for the steps corre-
sponding to the loss of NO3À or SO42À than that for the
step involving the loss of ClÀ could be due to the
contribution from the loss of en in the former cases.
The present TGA and DTA studies, thus enable to
understand the nature of thermal decomposition pro-
cess in CuꢀII) amine complexes. The trends in DH and
Ea values corresponding to various steps for different
complexes can be understood in a semi-quantitative
manner in the light of the structure and co-ordinating
nature of the ligands and the counter anions.
Acknowledgements
A research grant from the University Grants Com-
mission ꢀIndia) to L.S. Prabhumirashi and a JRF to
J.K. Khoje are thankfully acknowledged.
4. Mechanisms
References
Since the mechanism of any reaction depends on a
large number of factors, such as, e.g. temperature,
exothermic or endothermic nature of the process,
stoichiometry, crystal structure, packing, catalysing
or other effect of accompanying species [23], etc. one
cannot expect a unique mechanism to be applicable to
all the decomposition steps or even to similar steps of
different complexes. For the sake of completeness, the
most probable mechanisms corresponding to the
major decomposition steps of all the complexes
deduced as explained earlier are indicated in Table 1
and some common trends observed are noted below.
The dehydration steps of majority of the complexes,
viz. en complexes of CuꢀII) chloride, nitrate, oxalate
and acetate, and the tmn complexes of CuꢀII) sulphate
and oxalate, are found to ®t more closely to the phase
boundary reaction, contracting area cylindrical sym-
metry mechanism ꢀR2). The deamination step in the
case of en complexes of CuꢀII) chloride, nitrate,
oxalate and acetate and tmn complex of CuꢀII) nitrate
®ts closely to the phase boundary reaction, contracting
area, cylindrical symmetry) ꢀR2) mechanism; and that
in the case of tmn complexes of CuꢀII) chloride and
sulphate obey the random nucleation F1 mechanism.
The deanionation step in majority of the cases ꢀviz. en
complexes of CuꢀII) chloride, nitrate, sulphate and
oxalate, and tmn complexes of CuꢀII) chloride and
acetate) ®ts closely to the phase boundary reaction
contracting area cylindrical symmetry R2 mechanism.
[1] L.S. Prabhumirashi, G.N. Natu, J.K. Khoje, J. Therm. Anal.
35 ꢀ1989) 1097.
[2] L.S. Prabhumirashi, G.N. Natu, S.R. Nayak, J. Therm. Anal.
35 ꢀ1989) 1105.
[3] J.K. Khoje, Ph.D. Thesis, Pune University, Pune 411007,
India, 2000.
[4] W.W. Wendlandt, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 25 ꢀ1963) 833.
[5] H. Langfelderova, V. Karla, M. Lirkesova, J. Gazo, J. Therm.
Anal. 26 ꢀ1983) 95.
[6] P.C. Srivastava, B.N. Singh, S.D. Adhya, K.C. Banerji, J.
Therm. Anal. 27 ꢀ1983) 263.
[7] A.B.P. Lever, E. Mantovani, Inorg. Chem. 10 ꢀ1971) 817.
[8] R.D. Ball, D. Hall, C.E.F. Rickard, T.N. Waters, J. Chem. Soc.
A ꢀ1967) 1435.
[9] M.E. Baldwin, Spectrochim. Acta 19 ꢀ1963) 315.
[10] J. Malaviya, P.R. Shukla, L.N. Shrivastava, J. Inorg. Nucl.
Chem. 35 ꢀ1963) 1706.
[11] E. Luukkonen, A. Pajunen, Suom. Kemistilehti B46 ꢀ1973)
292; CA 80 75240p.
[12] E. Lemmetti, J. Saari, R. Katila, Suom. Kemistilehti B43
ꢀ1970) 263; CA 73 102976x.
[13] E.D. Estes, W.E. Estes, W.E. Hat®eld, D.J. Hodgson, Inorg.
Chem. 14 ꢀ1975) 106.
[14] B.J. Hathaway, I.M. Procter, R.C. Slade, A.A.G. Tomlinson, J.
Chem. Soc. A ꢀ1969) 2219.
[15] F.M. Jaegar, J.A. Dijk, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 227 ꢀ1936) 273.
[16] R.J. Fereday, P. Hodgson, S. Tyagi, B.J. Hathaway, J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton trans. ꢀ1981) 2070.
[17] S. Pal, L. Jansonne, Magy. Kem. Foly. 81 ꢀ1975) 70; CA 83
21077j.
[18] E.J. Duff, J. Chem. Soc. A ꢀ1968) 434.
[19] H. Nakai, Y. Deguchi, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 48 ꢀ1975) 2557.
[20] A.I. Vogel, A Text-Book of Qantitative Inorganic Analysis,
3rd Edition, New York, 1961 ꢀChapters 3 and 4).