2
874
J . Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 2874-2876
Meta Selectivity in th e F r ied el-Cr a fts
Rea ction In d u ced by a F a u ja site-Typ e
Zeolite
novel approach, we therefore tried to use a heterogeneous
catalyst for this reaction (Scheme 1).
Instead of aluminum chloride, a faujasite-type zeolite
8
can be used as a thermal catalyst for this reaction. This
Hendrikus W. G. van Herwijnen and Udo H. Brinker*
zeolite contains supercages of 12 Å that can be accessed
through windows of 7.5 Å diameter. Thus, the pores and
cavities are large enough for benzyl chloride to be in-
Institut f u¨ r Organische Chemie, Universit a¨ t Wien,
W a¨ hringer Strasse 38, A-1090 Wien, Austria
9
cluded. The benzyl chloride molecules are believed to be
partly “shielded” by the zeolite framework and are there-
fore not as freely accessible as in solution. Thus, it was
hoped that the ability to polymerize should be reduced.
Indeed, compared with the solvent reaction, consider-
ably less polymer is formed within NaY. After 2 h, only
Received November 2, 2000
Zeolites comprise a broad range of both natural and
synthetic microporous, crystalline aluminosilicates that
are constructed from corner-sharing SiO4/2 and AlO4/2
1
7% was not converted into polymer in the retarded
1
tetrahedra. They have a substantial potential as shape-
solvent reaction (Table, entry 2), whereas 73% could be
isolated from the zeolite (Table, entry 4). Benzylbenzyl
chloride (1) was obtained in yields of 12%. In addition,
selective catalysts. Within their micropores, only mol-
ecules of proper shape and dimension can undergo
reactions. The reaction pathways can be completely
different from those in solution, even for highly reactive
5
3% of unreacted benzyl chloride and 2% of trimers were
recovered from the zeolite. When the reaction time was
prolonged, more benzyl chloride was converted into 1,
increasing the yield remarkably to 33% (Table, entry 6).
Although, with the exception of entry 6, polymer
formation exceeds that of the dimer, these preliminary
results show that zeolites seem destined to become the
medium of choice for coupling reactions that normally
lead to uncontrollable polymerization.
2
intermediates such as carbenes. Pentasil zeolites, such
as ZSM-5, with their three-dimensional framework of
one-dimensional channels, have often been used to obtain
linear” products. For example, para selectivity was
“
observed when ethyl benzene was alkylated within this
3
zeolite. Furthermore, the para isomerization from o- and
m-xylene catalyzed by pentasil zeolites is a major indus-
trial process.4
Without doubt, the most interesting aspect revealed
by these experiments is the peculiar isomer ratio of the
dimers formed. This study presents an example whereby
the “banana-shaped” space created by a cage-window-
cage arrangement favors formation of the “bent” meta
product, even though electronic effects favor the ortho
Faujasite-type zeolites do not have linear pores, but
their cavities are arranged in a tetrahedral pattern.
Nevertheless, some examples of a high para selectivity
in substitution reactions catalyzed by a faujasite exist.5
It is well-known that when a conventional Lewis acid,
like AlCl
3
, is added to benzyl chloride, a polymeric resin
6
and para isomers. The CH Cl pendant in benzyl chloride
is rapidly formed. Indeed, upon addition of AlCl
3
at room
2
has a slight electron-withdrawing inductive effect, which
temperature, neat benzyl chloride immediately polymer-
izes (see Table, entry 1). However, if the dimer 1-(chloro-
methyl)-x-(phenylmethyl)benzene (x ) 2, 3, 4) (benzyl-
benzyl chloride) (1) is sought instead of the polymer, one
must employ a multistep reaction starting from another
compound. But if the Friedel-Crafts reaction from benzyl
chloride with a homogeneous catalyst is preferred, one
should retard the polymerization process to obtain the
primary product. Thus, the solution must be dilute and
the reaction performed at a lower temperature. This
deactivates not only the ortho/para positions, but also,
though to a smaller extent, the meta position. This
deactivation is opposed in the ortho/para positions, but
not in the meta position, by an activating mesomeric
effect. In the case of benzyl chloride, this leads to a
deactivating effect, which is most pronounced in the meta
positions, weaker in the ortho positions and insignificant
in the para position.10 This agrees with the isomer ratio
obtained from the solvent reaction (Table, entry 2). In
the zeolite-catalyzed reactions, however, the meta isomer
is always highly favored (Table, entries 4-8).
7
reaction was conducted 70 years ago. The authors
obtained the dimer in no more than 2% isolated yield,
while our yield was about 8% (see Table, entry 2). In a
Since the meta isomer is generally the thermodynami-
cally most stable isomer,11 one could suspect that the
preference for this isomer is due to thermodynamic
*
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +43-1-4277
2121; Fax: +43-1-4277 52140.
1) Meier, W. M.; Olson, D. H.; Baerlocher, Ch. Atlas of Zeolite
Structure Types, 4th ed.; Elsevier: London, 1996. Zeolites 1996, 17,
5
(
(8) For the photochemical behavior of BnCl within NaY see: Alvaro,
M.; Corma, A.; Garcia, H.; Miranda, M. A.; Primo, J . J . Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1993, 1041-1042. Among other products, 1 was also
formed. The number of isomers of 1 as well as their ratio, however,
were not reported.
1
-230.
(
2) (a) Kupfer, R.; Poliks, M. D.; Brinker, U. H. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1
994, 116, 7393-7398. (b) Brinker, U. H.; Rosenberg, M. G. In
Advances in Carbene Chemistry; Brinker, U. H., Ed.; J AI: Stamford,
1
998; Vol. 2, pp 29-44.
(9) Approximately 2 mmol of BnCl were taken up by 1 g of activated
zeolite. This corresponds to 3 molecules of BnCl per supercage! This
large number can be explained by assuming that there is one molecule
of BnCl in the center of each supercage, and one in every window
accessing the supercages.
(
3) Kim, J .-H.; Yamagishi, K.; Namba, S.; Yashima, T. J . Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1990, 1793-1794.
(
4) H o¨ lderich, W.; Gallei, E. Chem.-Ing.-Tech. 1984, 56, 908-915.
(
5) (a) Chiche, B.; Finiels, A.; Gauthier, C.; Geneste, P.; Graille, J .;
Pioch, D. J . Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 2128-2130. (b) Smith, K.; Bahzad,
(10) Ingold, C. K.; Shaw, F. R. J . Chem. Soc. 1949, 575-581.
(11) (a) McCauley, D. A.; Lien, A. P. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74,
6246-6250. (b) Olah, G. A.; Tolgyesi, W. S.; Dear, R. E. A. J . Org.
Chem. 1962, 27, 3441-3449. (c) Olah, G. A.; Tolgyesi, W. S.; Dear, R.
E. A. J . Org. Chem. 1962, 27, 3449-3455. (d) Olah, G. A.; Tolgyesi,
W. S.; Dear, R. E. A. J . Org. Chem. 1962, 27, 3455-3464. (e) Olah, G.
A.; Meyer, M. W. J . Org. Chem. 1962, 27, 3464-3469.
D. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge) 1996, 467-468.
(
6) (a) Friedel, C.; Crafts, J . M. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1885, 43, 53.
(
b) Montaudo, G.; Passerini, R.; Bottino, F.; Finocchiaro, P. Ann. Chim.
(
Rome), 1967, 57, 905-926.
(
7) Wertyporoch, E.; Farnik, A. J ustus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1931,
4
91, 265-273.
1
0.1021/jo005716r CCC: $20.00 © 2001 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 03/29/2001