Full Paper
The separation performance of nonaqueous LLCs was inves-
tigated by batch extraction experiments with tocopherols as
typical solutes, which are the most important fat-soluble anti-
oxidants in biological systems. As shown in Figure 1a, the LLC
extractant [Ch][Lau]–DMSO showed extraordinary extraction ef-
ficiency for tocopherol compared to other extractants, includ-
with LLC extractant, whereas less than 6.6% d-tocopherol was
extracted with [Emim][OAc]–DMSO as extractant under the
same conditions. Other nonaqueous LLCs containing different
ASC-ILs and polar solvents also showed excellent extraction ca-
pacities for tocopherol (Figure 3c; Figure S2 and Table S1 in
the Supporting Information). Therefore, this class of novel non-
aqueous LLC extractants has made tremendous progress
toward better extraction capacity compared with existing ex-
tractants, as was highlighted by the unparalleled distribution
ing common ILs, organic solvents, and polymer extractants. At
À1
a feed concentration C of 5 mgmL , the distribution coeffi-
f
cient for d-tocopherol Dd-toc of [Ch][Lau]–DMSO was up to
49.52, which is 26 and 99 times larger than those of organic
coefficients obtained at very high C . This is of crucial signifi-
f
extractants DMF (1.88) and DMSO (0.50), and also significantly
larger than those of common IL-containing extractants without
LC structure, such as 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate
cance for the development of industrially attractive extraction
technology, because the consumption of relatively expensive
ILs required for a certain task can be dramatically decreased by
the high capacity of LLCs.
(
[Emim][OAc])–DMSO (3.01) and [P4444][Lau]–DMSO (10.00). For
comparison, we also tested the separation performance of IL–
The new nonaqueous LLC extractants also showed excellent
extraction capacities for other H-bond donor compounds, such
as oleic acid (see the Supporting Information, Figure S3) and
naphthenic acid (see the Supporting Information, Figure S4),
which are typical solutes in the deacidification of fuel oils and
phenol (see the Supporting Information, Figure S5). The distri-
water mixtures. The Dd-toc values of [Ch][Lau]–water, [Bmim]
[
N(CN) ]–water, and [Emim][Ala]–water were all less than 0.02
2
À1
at a C value of 10 mgmL . We observed that D
increased
f
d-toc
with increasing alkyl chain length of the cation, but the value
was still less 0.5, which indicates that the absence of water in
extractants is crucial for d-tocopherol extraction.
bution coefficient of oleic acid in [Ch][Lau]–DMSO reached
À1
Furthermore, with increasing C , the D
with organic sol-
367.29 at a C value of 50 mgmL , which is much larger than
f
d-toc
f
vents or common ILs as extractants declined drastically (Fig-
values reported in the literature for ILs and polymer extractants
ure 3a), indicating poor capacities of these traditional extrac-
(see the Supporting Information, Table S2). The D
value
oleicacid
À1
À1
tants. For example, when C increased from 5 mgmL to
was as high as 136.20 at a C value of 200 mgmL , which is
f
f
À1
1
25 mgmL , the D
for [Emim][OAc]–DMSO and [P4444][Lau]–
thousands of times greater than those of [Bmim][N(CN)2],
poly(ethylene glycol) with an average molar mass of 200 (PEG
200), and [P4444][Lau]–DMSO (see the Supporting Information,
Figure S2 and Table S3). In the case of phenol, [Ch][Lau]–DMSO
showed superior extraction capacity (>2000) to the organic
extractant DMSO.
d-toc
DMSO dropped to 0.10 and 0.27, respectively. In contrast, no
decrease in Dd-toc was observed for the LLC extractant with in-
creasing C , and the D
values gradually increased and
f
d-toc
reached an unprecedented value of 58.89 at a very high C of
f
À1
1
25 mgmL , which is 841 times larger than that of [Emim]
[
OAc]–DMSO (0.07) and 981 times larger than that of [P4444
]
The excellent extraction capacity mainly depended on the
formation of self-organized anisotropic nanostructures and the
nature of the ASC-ILs. As shown in Figure 3b, a striking differ-
ence of the trend in the distribution coefficient with the in-
creasing IL concentration was found between common IL ex-
tractants and LLC extractants. In the common IL system [Ch]
[
Lau]–DMSO (0.06). These results indicate that 98.3% d-toco-
pherol could be separated from oil by a one-stage extraction
[
OAc]–DMSO, the Dd-toc value increases at first and then de-
creases sharply after passing through a maximum with increas-
ing concentration of IL, because the polarity of the extractant
increases with increasing concentration of IL, which disfavors
the extraction of organic solutes. In the [Ch][Lau]–DMSO LLC
system, Dd-toc steadily increases with increasing concentration
of IL. Furthermore, compared with Dd-toc of the [Ch][Lau]–
DMSO LLC system, Dd-toc for [P4444][Lau]–DMSO in the absence
of LLC is very low, although it has the same laurate anion and
higher lipophilicity, and this indicates that the LLC structure
plays a crucial role in the capacity. The Dd-toc value with [Ch]
[
Lau]–DMSO as extractant was also larger than that of [C mim]
12
[
Br]–DMSO (Figure 3a), which has a dodecyl chain in the cation
and a LLC structure (see the Supporting Information, Fig-
ure S6), and this indicates that anionic surfactivity is also a key
to the excellent performance of LLC extractants. Nonaqueous
Figure 3. a) Distribution coefficient of d-tocopherol Dd-toc in extractant–
hexane biphasic systems at different feed concentrations C . The molar frac-
f
tion of IL in the extractant was 0.1; b) Effect of the molar ratio of IL on Dd-toc
À1
at a C
tants at C
f
of 100 mgmL ; c) Dd-toc values for different IL-based LLCs as extrac-
[18]
LLCs also could be induced with nonionic surfactants, such
À1
f
=100 mgmL . LLC1: [Ch][Lau]–acetonitrile (10:90, molar), LLC2:
as polyoxyethylene alkyl ether, but these LLCs are not applica-
ble for extraction due to their high miscibility with nonpolar
solvents.
[
[
Ch][Myr]–DMSO (10:90, molar), LLC3: [Ch][Pal]–DMSO (10:90, molar), LLC4:
2222][Lau]–DMSO (50:50, molar), and LLC5: [Emim][Lau]–DMSO (40:60,
N
molar).
Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 9150 – 9156
9152
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim