7704
H. Kondo et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 7701–7704
(
b) Nakamura, H.; Aizawa, M.; Takeuchi, D.; Murai, A.;
17. Chemiluminescence reactions of imidazopyrazinones 1
gave the corresponding amidopyrazines 6 as main prod-
ucts (73–100% yields). Observed kem for each 1 indicates
Shimomura, O. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 2185–2188.
3
. (a) Shimomura, O.; Johnson, F. H.; Saiga, Y. J. Cell.
Comp. Physiol. 1962, 59, 223–239; (b) Johnson, F. H.;
Shimomura, O. Methods Enzymol. 1978, 57, 271–291; (c)
Ohmiya, Y.; Hirano, T. Chem. Biol. 1996, 3, 337–347.
. McCapra, F.; Chang, Y. C. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1967, 1011–1012.
ꢀ
*
that the light emission occurred from 5
.
18. (a) Hammett, L. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1937, 59, 96–103;
(b) Hansch, C.; Leo, A.; Taft, R. W. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91,
165–195.
4
5
6
19. Cyclic voltammetry measurements were performed in
ꢀ
4
acetonitrile containing TMG (0.10 mol L ) and Et -
1
1
. Goto, T.; Inoue, S.; Sugiura, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968,
3
ꢀ
873–3876.
NClO4 (0.10 mol L ) as a supporting electrolyte at
. (a) Shimomura, O.; Johnson, F. H. Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Commun. 1971, 44, 340–346; (b) Usami, K.; Isobe, M.
Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 12061–12090.
25 ± 1 ꢁC under Ar with an Ag/AgCl reference electrode
ꢀ
1
(scan rate: 100 mV s ). All reported potentials are
referenced to the oxidation potential of the ferrocene/
0
20
7
. (a) Hirano, T.; Gomi, Y.; Takahashi, T.; Kitahara, K.;
Chen, F. Q.; Mizoguchi, I.; Kyushin, S.; Ohashi, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 39, 5771–5774; (b) Saito, R.;
Hirano, T.; Niwa, H.; Ohashi, M. Chem. Lett. 1998, 1711–
ferricinium couple (E ¼ þ0:45 V versus SCE). Anion
ox
ꢀ
p
ox
2
showed irreversible waves to give E values with the
experimental errors within ± 0.01 V.
20. Sawyer, D. T.; Sobkowiak, A.; Roberts, J. L., Jr.
Electrochemistry for Chemists, 2nd ed.; John Wiley: New
York, 1995.
1712.
8
9
. (a) Goto, T.; Inoue, S.; Sugiura, S.; Nishikawa, K.; Isobe,
M.; Abe, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968, 4035–4038; (b) Toya,
Y.; Kayano, T.; Sato, K.; Goto, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
1
=2
ꢀ
21. The E
values of 2 were tentatively estimated to be
ox
p
E
ꢀ 0:03 Bird, A. J.; Faulkner, L. R. Electrochemical
ox
1992, 65, 2475–2479.
Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd ed.; John
. Kolthoff, I. M.; Chantooni, M. K., Jr.; Bhowmik, S. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 23–28.
Wiley: New York, 2001; p 239.
0
et
22. The ket values were estimated from the DG values by the
0
et
1
0. The O concentrations in aerated and oxygenated aceto-
equation: ket ¼ Z expðꢀDG =kBTÞ, where Z is the fre-
23
2
1
1
ꢀ1
ꢀ1
nitrile at 298 K were reported to be 1.7 and
quency factor taken as 1 · 10 mol L s , k
B
is the
ꢀ
3
ꢀ1
8
.1 · 10 mol L , respectively: Achord, J. M.; Hussey,
Boltzmann constant, and T is temperature in Kelvin.
Evaluation of thermal SET reactions using ket refers to the
C. L. Anal. Chem 1980, 52, 601–602. A solution with any
ꢀ
3
ꢀ1
24
concentration of O between 1.7 and 8.1 · 10 mol L
was prepared by bubbling a mixed gas of air and oxygen
through the solution. An accurate O concentration of the
studies by Fukuzumi et al.
2
23. Marcus, R. A. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1964, 15, 155–196.
24. (a) Fukuzumi, S.; Tanaka, T. In Photoinduced Electron
Transfer Part C; Fox, M. A., Chanon, M., Eds.; Elsevier:
Amsterdam, 1988; pp 578–635; (b) Itoh, S.; Kumei, H.;
Nagatomo, S.; Kitagawa, T.; Fukuzumi, S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 2165–2175; (c) Nakanishi, I.; Miyazaki,
K.; Shimada, T.; Ohkubo, K.; Urano, S.; Ikota, N.;
Ozawa, T.; Fukuzumi, S.; Fukuhara, K. J. Phys. Chem. A.
2002, 106, 11123–11126.
25. (a) Deeble, D. J.; Parsons, B. J.; Phillips, G. O.; Shuch-
mann, H.-P.; von Sonntag, C. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1988,
54, 179–193; (b) Cadenas, E.; Merenyi, G.; Lind, J. FEBS
Lett. 1989, 253, 235–238; (c) Jonsson, M.; Lind, J.;
Reitberger, T.; Eriksen, T. E.; Merenyi, G. J. Phys. Chem.
1993, 97, 8229–8233.
2
solution was determined by a comparison of the fluores-
cence intensity of 9,10-diphenylanthracence with those in
independently aerated and oxygenated solutions.
1
1. An intensity (I) of the total emitted light (400–700 nm) was
monitored using a Hamamatsu R5929 photomultiplier
tube powered by a Hamamatsu C4900 power supply. The
signal from the photomultiplier was collected on a PC
computer and the data were analyzed with the graphics
program Igor Pro, Version 4. 0. 8. 0 (Wave Metrics, Inc.).
2. The pseudo-first-order rate constant (kobsd) was obtained
1
by analysis using the equation: lnI
t
= ꢀkobsdt + lnI
0
,
where I and I are the intensities at t = 0 and t,
0
t
respectively. The experimental errors of kobsd were
within ± 10%.
26. Yoshioka, Y.; Yamanaka, S.; Yamada, S.; Kawakami, T.;
Nishino, M.; Yamaguchi, K.; Nishinaga, A. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 1996, 69, 2701–2722.
27. Fukuzumi, S.; Wong, C. L.; Kochi, J. K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1980, 102, 2928–2939.
1
3. Chemiluminescence spectra were recorded on an ATTO
AB-1850 spectrometer. The UCL values were determined
as quantum yields relative to the UCL (0.013) of luminol in
1
4
DMSO containing t-BuOK/t-BuOH under air. The
experimental errors of UCL were within ± 10%. The yields
of 4 were determined by GC analyses.
28. Fletcher, A. N.; Heller, C. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1967, 71,
1507–1518.
1
1
4. Lee, J.; Seliger, H. H. Photochem. Photobiol. 1972, 15,
29. (a) Maeda, K.; Yamada, S. In Photochemistry on Solid
Surface; Anpo, M., Matsuura, T., Eds.; Elsevier: Amster-
dam, 1989; pp 184–195; (b) Maeda, K.; Yamada, S. Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1993, 66, 2659–2664; (c) Mori, Y.;
Isozaki, K.; Maeda, K. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2
1997, 1969–1976.
30. (a) Motoyoshiya, J.; Inoue, H.; Takaguchi, Y.; Aoyama,
H. Heteroatom Chem. 2002, 13, 252–257; (b) Motoyoshiya,
J.; Ikeda, T.; Tsuboi, S.; Kusaura, T.; Takeuchi, Y.;
Hayashi, S.; Yoshioka, S.; Takaguchi, Y.; Aoyama, H.
J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5950–5955.
227–237.
5. The emitted light was monitored at 470 ± 10 nm with a
JASCO FP-6500 spectrofluorometer in the experiments of
the concentration effects of O
2
on the chemiluminescence
reaction of 1c.
ꢀ
1
ꢀ1
1
6. The kox value of 22 mol L s for 1c was determined
with the same apparatus as in Note 15, while those shown
in Table 1 were determined with the apparatus described
in Note 11. The values for 1c from the two apparatuses
agreed within experimental error.