D. Ding et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 5211–5213
5213
reaction of 3 with compound 4 (Scheme 3), which is the pivotal
step in the synthesis of 1, we found that it was advantageous to
utilize the crude aldehyde 3 directly without further purification
to afford the optimal yield of 2 (it is noteworthy that all attempts
to obtain a pure sample of compound 3 failed). In our initial at-
tempts to synthesize 2, THF was used as solvent and n-BuLi was
utilized as base, and the product was isolated in 6% yield in the
two-step procedure. In order to optimize the reaction conditions,
other bases were evaluated. The yields obtained by substituting
n-BuLi with either LiHMDS, NaHMDS, or NaOEt were 8%, 10%,
and 11%, respectively, for the two-step synthetic procedure. To
our satisfaction, when tert-BuOK was used as base, the yield of 2
improved significantly to 51% for the two step reaction.
phosphine (PPh3) in toluene to obtain the desired compound 4 in
95% yield.
Characterization data (1H NMR, 13C NMR and high resolution
mass spectrometry) for compounds 1, 2 and 9 are provided in
the References and Notes section8.
In conclusion, an efficient method for the preparation of cis-2,6-
di-(2-quinolylpiperidine) (1) has been developed. The key step in
the synthetic scheme is the introduction of the two 2-quinolyl
moieties via Wittig reaction with N-Cbz-protected cis-piperidine-
2,6-dicarboxaldehyde. Other quinolyl analogues of norlobelane
and lobeline are currently being prepared utilizing this synthetic
procedure, and their biological evaluation is underway.
With the key compound 2 in hand, our initial strategy was to
synthesize compound 1 from 2 in one step by removal of the N-
Cbz group followed by double bond hydrogenation over 20%
Pd(OH)2. However, when this procedure was followed, TLC analysis
indicated a complex mixture, which proved difficult to purify by
column chromatography.
A similar outcome was observed when 10% Pd/C was used. We
speculated that these problems might be due to hydrogenolytic
ring opening of the piperidine ring under the reduction condi-
tions utilized. In order to circumvent this problem, a strategy
involving two separate steps was employed. First, we attempted
to reduce the double bonds utilizing Wilkinson’s catalysis6 prior
to removal of the N-Cbz group; however, no reaction occurred,
and the starting material was recovered. Subsequently, we turned
to a second strategy, and attempted the removal of the N-Cbz
group of 2 followed by double bond reduction. We found that
6 N HCl at reflux could be used to deprotect the N-Cbz group
affording compound 9 in quantitative yield. Hydrogenation of 9
to the desired compound 1 was achieved utilizing 10% Pd/C as
catalyst in 75% yield.
Scheme 3 provides the synthetic route to phosphonium salt 4,
which was utilized in the Wittig reaction of compound 3 to 2
(Scheme 2). 2-Methylquinoline was oxidized by SeO2 at a high
temperature (170 °C) under solvent-free conditions to afford alde-
hyde 10 in good yield. It should be noted that when this oxidation
reaction was performed in high boiling points solvents such as 1,4-
dioxane, the yield was very low, even after prolonged reaction
times. Aldehyde 10 could be reduced by NaBH4 in EtOH to afford
carbinol 11 in 92% yield, followed by bromination of 11 in 33%
HBr/AcOH to afford bromide 12 in high yield7 (we found that when
compound 10 was brominated with 48% aq HBr, the yield of 12 was
only 72% and the reaction required a long time for completion).
Compound 12 was then heated under reflux with triphenyl
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge support from NIH grant
U01 DA13519. The University of Kentucky holds patents on lobe-
line and the analogues described in the current work. A potential
royalty stream to LPD and PAC may occur consistent with Univer-
sity of Kentucky policy.
References and notes
8. The spectroscopic data of all known compounds are identical to the reported data.
All new compounds were characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR and high
resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). Selected data (NMR spectra were
recorded in CDCl3, 1H at 300 MHz and
C at 75 MHz): (i) Compound 2:
13
colorless oil; 1H NMR: d 7.91 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.78 (d, 2H, J = 7.5), 7.68–7.60
(m, 4H), 7.48–7.25 (m, 9H), 6.86 (dd, J = 16.2 Hz, 2H), 6.82 (dd, J = 16.2 Hz, 2H),
5.24 (s, 2H), 5.21 (s, 2H), 2.13–1.84 (m, 5H), 1.68–1.63 (m, 1H) ppm; 13C NMR: d
155.9, 155.8, 148.1, 137.6, 136.8, 136.2, 131.5, 129.6, 129.4, 128.7, 128.3, 128.2,
127.6, 127.4, 126.2, 119.3, 67.8, 52.2, 28.5, 15.6 ppm; HRMS (EI) Calcd for
C
35H31N3O2, 525.2416. Found 525.2419 (ii) Compound 9: viscous oil; 1H NMR: d
8.10–8.01 (m, 4H), 7.77–7.65 (m, 4H), 7.58–7.45 (m, 4H), 7.26–6.86 (m, 4H),
3.60–3.55 (m, 2H), 2.04–1.86 (m, 3H), 1.63–1.43 (m, 3H); 13C NMR: d 156.0,
148.2, 139.3, 136.5, 130.8, 129.8, 129.4, 127.6, 127.5, 126.3, 119.0, 59.2, 32.1,
24.7; HRMS(EI) calcd for C27H25N3 391.2048; Found 391.2045 (iii) Compound 1:
viscous oil; 1H NMR: d 8.08–7.99 (m, 4H), 7.76–7.79 (m, 2H), 7.62–7.68 (m, 2H),
7.50–7.45 (m, 2H), 7.32–7.26 (m, 2H), 3.11–3.06 (m, 4H), 2.61–2.57 (m, 2H),
2.02–1.94 (m, 4H), 1.78–1.71 (m, 3H), 1.27–1.19 (m, 3H); 13C NMR: d 162.5,
148.0, 136.6, 129.6, 128.9, 127.7, 126.9, 125.9, 121.6, 56.8, 37.0, 35.9, 32.4, 24.8;
HRMS(EI) Calcd for C27H29N3 395.2361. Found 395.2367.