Please do not adjust margins
MedChemComm
Page 6 of 8
DOI: 10.1039/C8MD00169C
ARTICLE
Journal Name
Methyl
4-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-2-oxo-6-pentadecyl-1,2,3,4- Biological assays
tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carboxylate (5a):
weight 458.63: g.mol ; Yield: 78%; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ) δ 7.93 General cell culture procedures
C
27
H
42
N
2
O
4
; molecular
-1
1
3
(br. s., 1H), 6.99 – 7.19 (m, 1H), 6.80 (br. s., 1H), 6.71 (d, J = 7.82 Hz,
1
–
6
1
3
H), 6.75 (d, J = 7.83 Hz, 1H), 5.27 (br. s., 1H), 3.62 (br. s., 3H), 2.52 The experiments were performed using C6 rat cells obtained from
2.75 (m, 2H), 1.45 – 1.64 (m, 2H), 1.16 – 1.38 (m, 24H), 0.89 (t, J = American Type Culture Collection (atcc®CCL-107™). The cells were
1
3
.85 Hz, 3H). C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl ) δ 166.0, 156.8, 154.1, cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM)
3
50.8, 144.9, 129.9, 118.0, 115.3, 113.3, 100.9, 55.1, 51.3, 50.6, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and containing
1.9, 29.7, 29.7, 29.6, 29.6, 29.4, 28.3, 22.7, 14.1.
penicillin/streptomycin (1%) and fungizone® (1%). They were kept
in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO at a temperature of 37 °C.
2
Methyl
6-heptadecyl-4-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-2-oxo-1,2,3,4-
molecular Treatment and experimental groups
weight 486.69 g.mol ; Yield: 85%; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ) δ 8.03
tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carboxylate (5b):
29 46 2 4
C H N O ;
-1
1
3
(br. s., 1H), 7.09 (t, J = 7.95 Hz, 1H), 6.83 (s, 1H), 6.75 (d, J = 7.82 Hz, The compounds were prepared as described above and dissolved in
1
1
1
1
5
H), 6.71 (d, J = 8.07 Hz, 1H), 6.49 (br. s., 1H), 5.27 (d, J = 2.69 Hz, cell culture-grade DMSO. Glioma cells were seeded at a density of
4
H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 2.49 – 2.71 (m, 2H), 1.44 – 1.61 (m, 2H), 1.19 – 1×10 cell per well in DMEM/10% FBS in 96-well plates. Cell cultures
1
3
.35 (m, 24H), 0.90 (t, J = 7.10 Hz, 3H). NMR C (100 MHz, CDCl
3
) δ were exposed to concentrations of 5, 10, 25, and 50 μM of the
66.0, 156.7, 154.4, 150.7, 144.9, 129.9, 118.1, 115.4, 113.2, 100.9, molecules for 48 h, while the control group was treated with vehicle
5.1, 51.3, 31.9, 29.8, 29.7, 29.7, 29.6, 29.4, 29.4, 28.4, 22.7, 14.1.
(1% of DMSO).
(Z)-Methyl
6-(heptadec-8-en-1-yl)-4-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-2-oxo- Cell viability assay
1
,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carboxylate
(5c):
29 44 2 4
C H N O ;
-1
1
molecular weight: 484.67 g.mol ; Yield: 68%; H NMR (400 MHz, After 48 h of treatment, cell viability was evaluated using an MTT
CDCl ) δ 8.21 (br. s., 1H), 7.25 – 7.35 (m, 6H), 5.99 (br. s., 1H), 5.40 assay. MTT solution (sterile stock solution of 5 mg/mL) was added
d, J = 2.93 Hz, 1H), 5.31 – 5.39 (m, 2H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 2.66 – 2.78 (m, to the incubation medium at a final concentration of 0.5 mg/mL.
3
(
2
0
1
3
2
H), 1.98 – 2.09 (m, 4H), 1.57 – 1.67 (m,.2H), 1.24 – 1.42 (m, 21H), The cells were left for 60 min at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2
.90 (t, J = 6.80 Hz, 3H). NMR C (100 MHz, CDCl ) δ 165.8, 153.5, atmosphere. Then the medium was removed and the plates were
3
51.1, 143.7, 130.0, 129.8, 128.8, 127.9, 126.5, 100.7, 55.6, 51.1, shaken for 30 min using DMSO as a solvent. The optical density of
1.9, 31.9, 31.9, 29.8, 29.7, 29.5, 29.4, 29.4, 29.3, 29.3, 29.3, 29.2, each well was measured at 492 nm. The results of the MTT assay
13
8.3, 27.3, 27.2, 22.7, 14.1.
are expressed as percentages of control group values.
Methyl
4-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-6-pentadecyl-2-thioxo-1,2,3,4- Cell proliferation assay
S; molecular
weight: 474,70 g.mol ; Yield: 81%; H NMR (400 MHz, CD
tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carboxylate (6a): C27
42 2 3
H N O
-1
1
3
3
OD) δ C6 cells were cultured at 5×10 cells/well in DMEM containing 10%
7
6
1
.14 (t, J = 7.83 Hz, 1H), 6.76 – 6.79 (m, 1H), 6.75 – 6.76 (m, 1H), FBS, in 96-well plates for 48 h. Then the cells were trypsinized, and
.69 – 6.72 (m, 1H), 5.28 (s, 1H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 2.69 – 2,84 (m, 2H), 100 µL aliquots were taken from each well for counting in a
13
.56 – 1.69 (m, 2H), 1.31 (s, 24H), 0.92 (t, J = 7.10 Hz, 3H). C NMR Neubauer chamber, using a microscope stereoscope.
OD) δ 175.2, 166.1, 157.4, 148.9, 144.6, 129.3, 117.4,
(100 MHz, CD
3
114.5, 113.1, 101.3, 54.8, 50.3, 31.7, 30.3, 29.4, 29.4, 29.3, 29.3, Lipophilicity calculations
29.3, 29.1, 29.1, 28.2, 22.3, 13.0.
The physicochemical parameter Clog P (the logarithm of n-
6-heptadecyl-4-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-2-thioxo-1,2,3,4- octanol/water partition coefficient P), based on established
tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carboxylate (6b): C29 S; molecular chemical interactions, was calculated using ChemDraw, Level: Ultra,
weight: 502.75 g.mol ; Yield: 74%; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ) δ 7.81 Version: 12.0.2.1076 (CambridgeSoft, Cambridge, MA, USA).
br. s., 1H), 7.34 (br. s., 1H), 7.19 (t, J = 7.95 Hz, 1H), 6.83 (d, J = 7.58
Hz, 1H), 6.78 (s, 1H), 5.36 (d, J = 3.42 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 2.66 – Calculating the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50
Methyl
46 2 3
H N O
-1
1
3
(
)
2
3
1
2
.77 (m, 2H), 1.54 – 1.67 (m, 2H), 1.28 (s, 24H), 0.90 (t, J = 6.85 Hz,
13
H). C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl
3
) δ 174.8, 165.6, 156.3, 147.4, 143.8, The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC ) was calculated
5
0
30.2, 118.7, 115.6, 113.6, 102.2, 55.8, 51.5, 31.9, 31.6, 29.7, 29.6, using GraphPad PRISM ® Prism 5 software for Windows Version 5.3.
9.6, 29.5, 29.5, 29.3, 29.3, 28.2, 22.7, 14.1.
IC50 was determined from a linear regression, which was related to
the inhibition percentage as a function of the logarithm of the
(Z)-Methyl
6-(heptadec-8-en-1-yl)-4-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-2-thioxo- concentrations tested, assuming a confidence interval of 95% (p
1
,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carboxylate
(6c):
C
29
H
44
N
2
O
3
S; <0.05).
molecular weight: 500.74 g.mol ; Yield: 60%; H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl ) δ 8.43 (s, 1H), 7.90 (br. s., 1H), 7.25 – 7.36 (m, 5H), 5.39 (d, Statistical analysis
J = 3.42 Hz, 1H), 5.34 – 5.39 (m, 2H), 3.64 (s, 3H), 2.76 – 2.85 (m,
-1
1
3
1
H), 2.62 – 2.74 (m, 1H), 1.96 – 2.11 (m, 4H), 1.56 – 1.67 (m, 2H), Data were analyzed for statistical significance by one-way analysis
1
3
1
CDCl
1
2
.22 – 1.44 (m, 20H), 0.90 (t, J = 6.80 Hz, 3H). C NMR (100 MHz, of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post-hoc test for multiple
) δ 174.8, 165.6, 156.3, 147.4, 143.8, 130.2, 118.7, 115.6, comparisons (Tukey test) using GraphPad Prism®software. Data are
13.6, 102.2, 55.8, 51.5, 31.9, 31.6, 29.7, 29.6, 29.6, 29.5, 29.5, expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Differences were
3
9.3, 29.3, 28.2, 22.7, 14.1.
considered significant at p < 0.05.
6
| J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins