ANTIINFLAMMATORY EFFECT OF ERDOSTEINE
1415
liver. The liberated sulphhydryl groups of this
metabolite are suggested to display free radical
scavenging activity (Dechant & Noble 1996). N-
Acetylcysteine, which has an oxidizable thiol
group, is a scavenger of HOCl (Gillissen et al
1997). Similarly, erdosteine seems to have a
scavenging activity against HOCl, which could
contribute to the inhibition of HOCl-induced lung
injury. S-CMC did not suppress the increase in lung
wet wt=BW and lung dry wt=BW at any of the
doses tested. Although the effect of S-CMC on
HOCl is unknown, the lack of free sulphhydryl
groups may be the reason for its weak activity.
Ambroxol tended to suppress the increase in lung
ni®cantly reduced the increased neutrophil counts
at a dose of 100 mg kg . These results indicate that
erdosteine exerts an inhibitory effect on LPS-
induced in¯ammation in a later phase rather than in
the TNF-a-mediated early phase.
1
This study showed that erdosteine inhibited neu-
trophil in®ltration without affecting TNF-a produc-
tion in mice intratracheally treated with LPS.
Although erdosteine did not signi®cantly inhibit the
TNF-a generation, it may have in¯uenced the
expression of adhesion molecules and=or the related
chemotactic factors in the process between TNF-a
and neutrophil recruitment. The recruited neu-
trophils release a variety of products, such as elastase
and ROS (McCusker & Hoidal 1988), the latter of
which can damage various cells to reinforce the
activity of elastase by inactivating a1-antitrypsin
(Carp & Janoff 1980). Moreover, neutrophil elastase
is shown to cause detachment and deformation of
human bronchial epithelial cells and to induce gene
expression and protein production of interleukin-8
(Shibata et al 1996). Thus, erdosteine may have
inhibited the production of neutrophil chemotactic
factors via prevention of airway epithelium injury
because of its scavenging action against ROS from
recruited neutrophils. N-Acetylcysteine is reported
to suppress nuclear factor-kB activation, cytokine-
induced neutrophil chemo-attractant messenger
RNA expression, and neutrophilic lung in¯amma-
tion in rats (Blackwell et al 1996). As regards the
exact mechanism for the anti-in¯ammatory effect of
erdosteine without affecting TNF-a production,
further investigation is needed.
1
wet wt=BW at a concentration of 10 mg kg and
signi®cantly inhibited it at 30 mg kg , although
1
the inhibition was just 29 and 23%, respectively.
Chemically, ambroxol and N-acetylcysteine are
completely different molecules. Ambroxol has
an aromatic ring with an amine group and a
hydroxycyclohexyl ring. Nevertheless, an HOCl
scavenging action by ambroxol has been reported
(Lapenna et al 1994; Gillissen et al 1997). In this
study, however, ambroxol did not signi®cantly
inhibit lung injury. Considering that erdosteine but
not ambroxol is a prodrug-type compound, the
possibility remains that ambroxol is almost oxi-
dized before arriving at airway tissues.
We previously reported that congestion, in®ltra-
tion of in¯ammatory cells, oedema and epithelium
disintegration were observed in the lung of mice 3
days after paraquat treatment, and that erdosteine
reduced these changes, delayed the onset of the
lethal event, and ®nally prevented the mortality
(Kaise et al 1993). The toxicity in acute paraquat
poisoning is believed to result from free radical
injury (Bus et al 1974). These ®ndings support the
notion that erdosteine suppresses ROS in-vivo, and
thus that the prevention of HOCl-induced lung
injury by erdosteine in this study was mediated via
its ROS scavenging action.
The effect of erdosteine on LPS-induced airway
in¯ammation was tested. We observed increases in
neutrophil counts and TNF-a level in BAL ¯uid 3 h
after intratracheal instillation of LPS. de Moraes
et al (1996) have previously reported increases in
TNF-a level and neutrophil counts in BAL ¯uid 3 h
after LPS inhalation in mice. In addition, they
demonstrated that TNF-a was produced before
neutrophil recruitment and that anti-TNF-a anti-
bodies blocked neutrophil recruitment. In this
study, erdosteine did not signi®cantly inhibit the
neutrophil in¯ux at 3 h after the LPS challenge,
presumably because of the inability of the drug
to prevent the production of TNF-a. In contrast,
at 24 h after the LPS instillation, erdosteine sig-
In conclusion, this study demonstrated that
erdosteine inhibited HOCl-induced acute lung
injury in mice, suggesting that this drug exerts a
scavenging effect on ROS in-vivo. The anti-
oxidative effect may be involved in the prevention
by erdosteine of LPS-induced neutrophil recruit-
ment into the airway. Our results suggest that the
attenuation of ROS and neutrophil in¯ux may
contribute to the clinical ef®cacy of erdosteine in
the therapy of chronic bronchitis.
References
Blackwell, T. S., Blackwell, T. R., Holden, E. P., Christman,
B. W., Christman, J. W. (1996) In vivo antioxidant treatment
suppresses nuclear factor-kappa B activation and neutro-
philic lung in¯ammation. J. Immunol. 157: 1630±1637
Bus, J. S., Aust, S. D., Gibson, J. E. (1974) Superoxide- and
singlet oxygen-catalyzed lipid peroxidation as a possible
mechanism for paraquat (methyl viologen) toxicity. Bio-
chem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 58: 749±755
Carp, H., Janoff, A. (1980) Potential mediators of in¯amma-
tion: phagocyte-derived oxidants suppress the elastase-
inhibitory capacity of alpha1-proteinase inhibitor in vitro.
J. Clin. Invest. 66: 987±995