10.1002/anie.201704544
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
state and the underlying dynamics were investigated in H2O/THF
(1:1 v/v) (Figure 3) and in H2O (pH = 7.2) (Figure S13,
Supporting Information). Upon excitation at 450 nm, transient
absorption measurements with TCPP reference (Figure S14,
Supporting Information) gave rise to minima at 532, 570, 606,
and 660 nm, which reflect the ground state depletion of the Q-
band absorptions. Notably, the entire visible range is
superimposed by a broad positive transient stemming from
excited state absorptions. Overall, the deactivation is best
described by four transient / four lifetimes (Figure 4, left). It is
first a higher lying, second singlet excited state, which decays
with 2.4 ps via internal conversion. Secondly, it is the first singlet
excited state as product of the internal conversion. Next, a short-
and a long-lived decay is derived with 84.9 ps and 4.3 ns,
respectively. Here, 84.9 ps reflects the decay of aggregated
TCPP to the ground state, while 4.3 ns relates to the intersystem
crossing of monomeric TCPP to form the triplet excited state
(Figure 3, left). It is important to note that microseconds is the
lifetime of the triplet excited state. The situation is rather different
in TArP-CONH-NCNDs. In Figure 3, the minima, which are
discernable at 527, 558, 598 and 653 nm, confirm the porphyrin
excitation. Remarkably, immediately following the conclusion of
the 450 nm photoexcitation, a transient absorption spectrum is
discernable, which is in sound agreement with the sum of the
one-electron oxidized form of TCPP and the one-electron
reduced form of NCND. As such, charge separation seems to
evolve from a higher lying, second singlet excited state and, in
turn, to dominate even over the internal conversion (Figure 4,
right). Charge recombination is biphasic with 6.3 and 225 ps in
H2O as well as 10.0 and 246 ps in H2O/THF (1:1 v/v).
Importantly, in contrast to the TCPP reference, no evidence for
any internal conversion / intersystem crossing was established
(Figure 3, right).
than the first singlet excited state. Favorable thermodynamics
and strong mutual interactions are the driving forces for the
ultrafast charge separation. Excitation in the ultraviolet triggers a
cascade of energy transfers and charge separations.
Acknowledgements
The research leading to these results has received funding from
the University of Trieste, INSTM, the Seventh Framework
Programme [FP7/2007- 2013] under grant agreement n° 310651
(SACS project). Further financial support from MIUR (PRIN
contract No. 2010N3T9M4, FIRB RBAP11C58Y, FIRB RBAP11-
ETKA) is gratefully acknowledged. AC is a member of ALN and
acknowledges a DAAD-ALEARG postdoctoral fellowship.
Keywords: nanotechnology • carbon nanodots • porphyrins •
donor-acceptor • charge-separation
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
X. Xu, R. Ray, Y. Gu, H.J. Ploehn, L. Gearheart, K. Raker, W. A.
Scrivens, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12736–12737.
V. Georgakilas, J. a. Perman, J. Tucek, R. Zboril, Chem. Rev. 2015,
115, 4744–4822.
A. Cayuela, M. L. Soriano, C. Carrillo-Carrión, M. Valcárcel, Chem.
Commun. 2016, 52, 1311–1326.
S. N. Baker, G. A. Baker, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6726–
6744.
W. Kwon, G. Lee, S. Do, T. Joo, S. W. Rhee, Small 2014, 10, 506–
513.
X. Li, M. Rui, J. Song, Z. Shen, H. Zeng, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015,
25, 4929–4947.
B. C. M. Martindale, G. A. M. Hutton, C. A. Caputo, E. Reisner, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6018–6025.
B. C. M. Martindale, E. Joliat, C. Bachmann, R. Alberto, E. Reisner,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 9402–9406.
J. T. Margraf, F. Lodermeyer, V. Strauss, P. Haines, J. Walter, W.
Peukert, R. D. Costa, T. Clark, D. M. Guldi, Nanoscale Horiz. 2016,
1, 220–226.
In conclusion, we have reported a new study on an electron
donor-acceptor nanoconjugate, in which the light harvesting and
electron donating properties of meso-tetraarylporphyrins are, for
the first time, combined with the electron accepting features of
NCNDs. In addition to detailed photophysical studies, the hybrid
materials was extensively conjugated both with conventional and
uncommon techniques for carbon nanomaterials. Visible light
excitation transforms the strongly quenched porphyrin singlet
excited states in the TArP-CONH-NCND conjugate into charge
separated states. It is, however, a higher laying, second singlet
excited state, from which the charge separation occurs rather
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
L. Cao, X. Wang, M. J. Meziani, F. Lu, H. Wang, P. G. Luo, Y. Lin, B.
a Harruff, L. M. Veca, D. Murray, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 11318–11319.
P. G. Luo, S. Sahu, S.-T. Yang, S. K. Sonkar, J. Wang, H. Wang, G.
E. LeCroy, L. Cao, Y.-P. Sun, J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 2116–
2127.
S.-T. Yang, L. Cao, P. G. Luo, F. Lu, X. Wang, H. Wang, M. J.
Meziani, Y. Liu, G. Qi, Y.-P. Sun, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
11308–11309.
X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, S. Kalytchuk, S. V Kershaw, Y. Wang,
P. Wang, T. Zhang, Y. Zhao, H. Zhang, et al., ACS Nano 2013, 7,
11234–11241.
X. Guo, C.-F. Wang, Z.-Y. Yu, L. Chen, S. Chen, Chem. Commun.
2012, 48, 2692–2694.
G. A. M. Hutton, B. C. M. Martindale, E. Reisner, Chem. Soc. Rev.
2017, DOI 10.1039/C7CS00235A.
V. Strauss, J. T. Margraf, C. Dolle, B. Butz, T. J. Nacken, J. Walter,
W. Bauer, W. Peukert, E. Spiecker, T. Clark, et al., J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2014, 136, 17308–17316.
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
X. Wang, L. Cao, F. Lu, M. J. Meziani, H. Li, G. Qi, B. Zhou, B. a
Harruff, F. Kermarrec, Y.-P. Sun, Chem. Commun. 2009, 3774–6.
V. Strauss, J. T. Margraf, T. Clark, D. M. Guldi, Chem. Sci. 2015, 6,
6878–6885.
V. Strauss, J. T. Margraf, K. Dirian, Z. Syrgiannis, M. Prato, C.
Wessendorf, A. Hirsch, T. Clark, D. M. Guldi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2015, 54, 8292–7.
[20]
P. Yu, X. Wen, Y.-R. Toh, Y.-C. Lee, K.-Y. Huang, S. Huang, S.
Shrestha, G. Conibeer, J. Tang, J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 2894–
2901.
[21]
[22]
K. Kalyanasundaram, M. Graetzel, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2010, 21,
298–310.
J. Yang, M.-C. Yoon, H. Yoo, P. Kim, D. Kim, Chem. Soc. Rev.
2012, 41, 4808–4826.
[23]
[24]
L.-L. Li, E. W.-G. Diau, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 291–304.
G. de la Torre, G. Bottari, M. Sekita, A. Hausmann, D. M. Guldi, T.
Figure 3. Energy diagram for TCPP (left) and TArP-COONH-NCNDs (right)
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.