Inorganic Chemistry
Article
MOFs and analytes.7 At present, MOF-based luminescent
probes predominately show a fluorescence “turn-off” signal,
that is, the emission is quenched. However, “turn-off” sensors
feature low sensitivities and even give the false response
because many other species besides the targeted analytes may
also result in quenching phenomena. These “turn-off” sensors
are hardly employed in real-time applications. Comparatively,
for “turn-on” probes, when analytes are captured, either a
stronger intensity is sparked or wavelength shifts or even new
emission peaks are generated. Analytes can turn on the
fluorescence by limiting the free rotation of the linkers to
enhance the conjugation or by breaking the coordination
bonds in MOFs to prevent the ligand-to-metal charge transfer
or energy transfer.9 Therefore, development of robust and
efficient MOF-derived fluorescence “turn-on” probes for the
recognition of metal ions is more meaningful and highly
demanded.
Porphyrins are excellent near-infrared-emissive fluorescent
materials but nevertheless easily suffer from fluorescence
quenching caused by the aggregation-caused quenching effect.
In order to solve this problem, porphyrin-based MOFs have
been designed and developed. The porphyrin moieties serve as
inherent components in the frameworks, which would
significantly weaken the self-aggregation. Until now, only a
few of the porphyrin-based MOFs have been exploited for
fluorescence detection,10 exhibiting their potential in the field
of sensors. In this context, to exploit “turn-on” luminescent
probes for M3+ (Al3+, Cr3+, and Fe3+) ions, 5,10,15,20-tetrakis
(4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin (H2TCPP) was selected to
construct a lanthanide MOF Tb−TCPP.11 As shown in
Scheme 1, when Tb−TCPP comes into contact with these M3+
an F-4600 Hitachi fluorescence spectrophotometer at room temper-
ature, and the emission spectra were recorded ranging from 450 to
800 nm with 428 nm excitation. PXRD data were collected on an
Analytical Empyrean instrument using Cu Kα radiation at room
temperature. Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectros-
copy (ICP) was measured on the Agilent ICP-OES730 (Agilent,
American). Energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS) was conducted on
an Oxford instrument.
Synthesis of Tetrakis(4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrin (H2TCPP).
It was synthesized according to the previously reported literature.13
Typically, a 500 mL three-necked flask was equipped with 4-
carboxybenzaldehyde (18.48 g, 0.1236 mol) and propionic acid (300
mL). The mixture was stirred and heated to 100 °C until 4-
carboxybenzaldehyde was completely dissolved. Then, freshly distilled
pyrrole (8.4 mL, 0.12 mol) was added dropwise to the reaction
solution and the resulting dark mixture was stirred and refluxed for 12
h in the dark. After being cooled down to room temperature, the
mixture was placed at −4 °C in the freezer overnight to aid
precipitation. The precipitate was collected by filtration, followed by
carefully washing with H2O and CH2Cl2 and finally drying in vacuum
1
at 60 °C to give a purple solid (7 g, 30% yield). The H NMR of
Synthesis of Tb−TCPP. Tb−TCPP was prepared according to a
reported method.11 Typically, to a 50 mL vial were charged H2TCPP
(100 mg, 0.12 mmol), 2-fluorobenzoic acid (10 g, 71.4 mmol), and 20
mL of N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), and then, the mixture was
ultrasonically dissolved. After that, Tb(NO3)3·6H2O (453 mg, 0.1
mmol) and 5 mL of deionized water were added to the
abovementioned solution and further ultrasonic treatment was
utilized to form a clear solution. The resulting mixture was distributed
to 10 Pyrex vials and heated at 120 °C for 3 days and subsequently
cooled to room temperature. Dark purple hexagonal prism-shaped
crystals were harvested by filtration, followed by washing several times
with DMF until the filtrate became colorless.
Fluorescence Measurements. A suspension of Tb−TCPP was
prepared by adding 2 mg of the powder sample to 8 mL of DMF.
Then, it was ultrasonicated for 30 min, diluted with DMF to 0.05 mg/
mL, and was set aside for subsequent use. Aqueous solutions of metal
nitrates of K+, Na+, Li+, Mg2+, Cu2+, Cd2+, Zn2+, Fe2+, Ca2+, Al3+, Fe3+,
and Cr3+ were prepared, with a concentration of 0.01 M.
Scheme 1. Schematic Representation of Luminescent Al3+,
Cr3+, and Fe3+ Detection Based on Tb−TCPP
Fluorescence Response to Different Metal Ions. A total of 10 μL
0.01 M M(NO3)x (M = K+, Na+, Li+, Mg2+, Cu2+, Cd2+, Zn2+, Fe2+,
Ca2+, Al3+, Fe3+, and Cr3+, x = 1−3) aqueous solution was added to
400 μL of Tb−TCPP suspension prepared above. After 10 s, the
fluorescence of the solution was measured.
Fluorescence Response to M3+ (Al3+, Cr3+, and Fe3+) Ions with
Different Concentrations. A total of 10−80 μL of 0.001 M M3+ (Al3+,
Cr3+, and Fe3+) aqueous solution was added to the Tb−TCPP
aqueous suspension. Then, the fluorescence was measured.
Fluorescence Response to Different Anions. A total of 10 μL of
0.01 M sodium salt (PO43−, SO42−, CO32−, NO3 , F−, Cl−, Br−, I−,
−
and OAc−) aqueous solutions was added to 400 μL of 0.05 mg/mL
Tb−TCPP suspension. After 10 s, the fluorescence of the solution
was measured.
ions, the fluorescence increased immediately. In sharp contrast,
the presence of other metal cations do not result in significant
fluorescence response of Tb−TCPP. The detection limit of
Tb−TCPP for M3+ (Al3+, Cr3+, and Fe3+) ions is in the nM
range, which is lower than that of other MOF-based sensors.12
Millimolar concentration levels of Al3+ could even be visually
detected by Tb−TCPP. EDS, ICP, and powder X-ray
diffraction (PXRD) experiments confirm that the detection
mechanism involves exchange between Tb3+ with respective
M3+ ions.
Fluorescence Response to Different pH. Solutions of 0−12 pH
were prepared with HCl/NaOH. A total of 10 μL of 2 mg/mL Tb−
TCPP was added to 400 μL of aqueous solution with different pH
values prepared above, and the fluorescence of the solution was
measured.
Selectively to Detect Al3+, Cr3+, and Fe3+. A total of 10 μL of 0.01
M M(NO3)x (M = K+, Na+, Li+, Mg2+, Cu2+, Cd2+, Zn2+, and Ca2+; x
= 1−3) aqueous solution was added to 400 μL of Tb−TCPP
suspension prepared above. After 10 s, the fluorescence of the solution
was measured. Then, 10 μL of Al3+, Cr3+, and Fe3+ aqueous solution
was added to the mixed solutions mentioned above, and the
fluorescence of the solution was measured.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
■
Materials and Instrumentation. All chemicals were commer-
cially purchased and used without further purification. The scanning
electron microscopy (SEM) images were taken on an S-7800f
scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, Japan). Absorption spectra
were recorded on a Cary 50 UV/Vis spectrophotometer (Perki-
nElmer, Malaysia). All fluorescence experiments were performed on
Fluorescence Response of H2TCPP to Different Metal Ions. A
total of 10 μL of 0.01 M M(NO3)x (x = 1−3) aqueous solution was
added to 400 μL of 0.22 mg/mL H2TCPP suspension prepared
above. After 10 s, the fluorescence of the solution was measured.
1117
Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 1116−1123