Notes and references
{ MnO2 (ALFA 99.999%), Mn (Aldrich 99.99%), CuO (Aldrich 99.99%);
Cu2S was prepared by reacting Cu powder (ALFA 99.999%) with S
(ALFA 99.9995%) in an evacuated silica tube at 400 uC for 1 day then
700 uC for 4 days; SrS was prepared by reaction of SrCO3 (ALFA 99.99%)
with CS2 vapour (Aldrich 99.9%) in an Ar stream at 800 uC for 4 hours.
˚
Pentane for washing lithiated products was dried over 4 A molecular sieves,
refluxed over Na/K alloy under N2 and collected by distillation. Analysis
for Li was carried out using a Thermo Elemental Atomscan 16 ICP
analyser; Li ions were leached out by boiling the lithiated solid in 20% nitric
acid solution.
§ PXRD data were collected using a Philips X’Pert PW3209 diffractometer
operating with CuKa radiation in Bragg–Brentano geometry with samples
sealed inside air-tight cells. Time-of-flight PND data (POLARIS
diffractometer, ISIS, UK; detector banks at 35u, 90u and 145u 2h (0.5 ,
˚
d , 8 A)) were collected on 3 g samples sealed in vanadium cans. Rietveld
analysis was performed using the GSAS suite.16
Crystal data: Sr2MnO2Li1.86(3)S2 (1Li): T 5 295 K, tetragonal, space
Fig. 3 Arrhenius plot relating the rate of lithiation to reaction
temperature. Inset: the Sharp–Hancock13 plots from which the rate
constants were extracted (see text). In each case the lines are linear fits to
the data points.
˚
group I4/mmm (no. 139), a 5 4.07036(8), c 5 17.8721(4) A, Z 5 2;
Mn (0 0 0), Sr (0.5 0.5 0.09218(3)), O (0.5 0 0), S (0 0 0.17099(7)), Li (0.5 0
0.25; occupancy 0.943(6)); x2 5 3.643; wRp 5 0.0178.
Sr2MnO2Li3.8(1)S3 (2Li): T 5 295 K, tetragonal, space group P4/mmm
˚
(no. 123), a 5 4.05416(9), c 5 11.7962(3) A, Z 5 1; Mn (0 0 0), Sr (0.5 0.5
0.14101(8)), O (0 0.5 0), S1 (0 0 0.2574(2)), S2 (0.5 0.5 0.5), Li (0 0.5
0.3830(2); occupancy 0.904(7)); x2 5 1.832; wRp 5 0.0170. Note: this model
for 2Li has Li located only on the ‘‘ideal’’ tetrahedral sites; a second Li site
(0.103(5), 0.229(4), 0.415(2)) may be y5% occupied.
high field ferromagnetic ordering are apparently lost (Fig. 4). This
change is presumably a consequence of reduction of the Mn
oxidation state and changes in the between-layer superexchange
pathways effected by the substitution of Cu+ by Li+ and the large
increase in Mn–S bond length. On air exposure the magnetic
properties characteristic of 2Cu were not restored, confirming that
CCDC 604753–604760. For crystallographic data in CIF or other
electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/b605105g
In situ energy dispersive PXRD data were obtained on Station 16.4 of
the SRS, Daresbury Laboratory, UK using apparatus developed by
O’Hare and co-workers.17 0.3 g of Sr2MnO2Cu3.5S3 powder, 10 cm3 of
2.5 M n-BuLi solution (Li : Mn ratio 160 : 1) in hexanes and a glass-coated
magnetic follower were sealed inside a Pyrex ampoule. This was placed
inside a pre-heated aluminium heating block on Station 16.4 and the
reaction was stirred using a magnetic stirrer such that the amount of solid
exposed to the beam was constant with time. Slits in the heating block
allowed passage of the incident and diffracted beams. Scattered X-rays
were measured using three energy discriminating detectors located at 2–6u
the reaction is only quasi-reversible under these conditions.
6
Preliminary
experiments
on
Sr4Mn2O4Cu5S5
and
5
Sr2MnO2Cu5.5S4 suggest that full lithiation is possible in these
compounds. Investigation of the reversibility of the processes using
electrochemical methods, the lithium ion mobility and the
relevance of these compounds to novel lithium ion battery
materials14 is in progress,15 together with further investigation of
the reaction kinetics and the magnetic and electronic properties of
both the copper- and lithium-containing materials.
˚
2h and covering a d-spacing range of 1–46 A.
" Magnetic susceptibility (Quantum Design MPMS-XL SQUID magnet-
ometer) measurements were made on warming in an applied field of 10 mT
after cooling in zero field (zero-field cooled) and after cooling in the
measuring field (field-cooled). Magnetisation isotherms were measured in
applied fields of up to ¡5 T.
We thank the CCLRC for access to ISIS and the SRS, Dr R. I.
Smith for assistance on POLARIS, Dr D. Taylor and Mr A. Neild
for assistance on Station 16.4, and the EPSRC for providing a
studentship for O. J. R.
1 J. Rouxel and M. Tournoux, Solid State Ionics, 1996, 84, 141.
2 J. Gopalakrishnan, Chem. Mater., 1995, 7, 1265.
3 P. G. Bruce, Chem. Commun., 1997, 19, 1817.
4 J. L. Tirado, Mater. Sci Eng., R, 2003, 40, 103.
5 Z. A. Ga´l, O. J. Rutt, C. F. Smura, T. P. Overton, N. Barrier,
S. J. Clarke and J. Hadermann, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, DOI: 10.1021/
ja060892o.
6 N. Barrier and S. J. Clarke, Chem. Commun., 2003, 164.
7 A. C. W. P. James, B. Ellis and J. B. Goodenough, Solid State Ionics,
1988, 27, 45.
8 A. Grzechnik, A. Vegas, K. Syassen, I. Loa, M. Hanfland and
M. Jansen, J. Solid State Chem., 2000, 154, 603.
9 N. E. Brese and M. O’Keeffe, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci.,
1991, 47, 192.
10 M. Avrami, J. Chem. Phys., 1939, 7, 1103.
11 B. V. Erofe’ev, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1946, 52, 511.
12 S. F. Hulbert, J. Br. Ceram. Soc., 1969, 6, 11.
13 J. D. Hancock and J. H. Sharp, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1972, 55, 74.
14 M. Morcrette, P. Rozier, L. Dupont, E. Mugnier, L. Sannier, J. Galy
and J. M. Tarascon, Nat. Mater., 2003, 2, 755.
15 S. Indris, J. Cabana, O. J. Rutt, S. J. Clarke and C. P. Grey, manuscript
in prepration.
Fig. 4 The zero-field cooled (ZFC) magnetic susceptibilities (measuring
field 10 mT) of Sr2MnO2Cu3.5S4 (2Cu) (N) and the lithiated product
Sr2MnO2Li3.8(1)S4 (2Li) (#). The field-cooled susceptibility of 2Li is
coincident with the ZFC susceptibility. The inset shows the magnetisation
isotherms at 5 K measured on the same samples.
16 A. Larson and R. B. von Dreele, The General Structure Analysis System,
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 1985.
17 S. M. Clark, A. Nield, T. Rathbone, J. Flaherty, C. C. Tang, J. S. O.
Evans, R. J. Francis and D. O’Hare, Nucl. Instrum. Methods, 1995, 97,
98.
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006
Chem. Commun., 2006, 2869–2871 | 2871