Full Papers
Commercial (Al2O3, CeO2, La2O3, SiO2, TiO2, ZrO2,)-supported cata-
lysts containing 2.5 wt% Pd were prepared by the same method
as the 2.5%Pd/CeO2 except different supports were used. For dis-
tinguishing, commercial CeO2 supported Pd was labelled as
2.5%Pd/CeO2-C.
2.5%Ag/CeO2, 2.5%Au/CeO2, 2.5%Pt/CeO2, 2.5%Rh/CeO2, and
2.5% Ru/CeO2 catalysts were prepared by the same method as the
2.5%Pd/CeO2 except different metal salts were used (AgNO3,
HAuCl4·4H2O, H2PtCl6, RhCl3·3H2O, RuCl3·3H2O).
Scheme 1. Possible hydrogenation pathway of nitroarenes on Pd/CeO2.
Characterization of catalysts
alytic activity and high chemoselectivity for the hydrogenation
of a variety of substituted nitroarenes including those with re-
ducible functional groups to the corresponding aromatic
amines in the absence of solvent and additives under mild re-
action conditions. Pd2+ ion species existed as isolated single
atoms with ÀPd2+ÀO2ÀÀCe4+À linkages on the surface of the
PdxCe1ÀxO2Às solid solution and served as active sites for the
selective hydrogenation of nitroarenes in the absence of sol-
vent. The superior catalytic performance could be attributed to
the synergistic effect between Pd2+ ions and unique surface
sites of CeO2. The Pd/CeO2 catalyst could be recovered easily
for at least seven recycling reactions without the loss of cata-
lytic properties. The present study will also contribute to the
development of efficient and environmentally friendly metal
catalysts and provide a new insight into the catalytic behavior
of supported Pd and other noble metals for various organic re-
actions.
The actual weight percentages of Pd in the catalysts were analyzed
by ICP-AES conducted with a PerkinElmer emission spectrometer.
XRD analysis was performed with a Rigaku D/MAX-2500 apparatus
using CuKa radiation (l=0.15418 nm) at a voltage of 40 kV and a
current of 40 mA. TEM images were recorded with a JEOL JEM-
2010F field emission microscope operating at 200 kV. The sample
was prepared by placing a drop of ethanol solution of well-ground
catalyst powder on a carbon-coated copper grid, followed by etha-
nol evaporation. XPS were measured by using an ESCALAB 250Xi
spectrometer equipped with monochromatized AlKa radiation
(hv=1486.6 eV) operated at a pressure of ca. 1ꢁ10À9 torr. The
spectra were calibrated by using the binding energy of the C1s
peak at 284.6 eV. Specific surface areas of the samples were mea-
sured by using a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 Sorptometer at liquid ni-
trogen temperature (À1968C). Before the measurement, the
sample was degassed at 3008C for 10 h. The specific surface area
was evaluated by using the BET method. The Raman spectra were
obtained with a Renishaw inVia Raman spectrometer under ambi-
ent conditions at an excitation wavelength of 514 nm.
Experimental Section
Catalyst reaction and analysis
Chemicals
The selective hydrogenation of nitroarenes was performed in a
100 mL high-pressure reactor with magnetic stirring and pressure
control system. For a typical catalytic reaction, catalyst (10 mg) and
substrate (50 mmol) were first added into the reactor. The reaction
mixture was heated to the desired temperature (Æ0.28C) under
vigorous stirring for 1 h under N2 atmosphere. After this, the reac-
tor was flushed five times with 1.0 MPa H2, and then the reaction
was performed at the set H2 pressure and at a stirring rate of
900 rpm, at which the mass transport or diffusion limitation was
confirmed to be negligible in the reaction. At the end of the reac-
tion, the remaining hydrogen was discharged slowly to atmospher-
ic pressure, and was immediately switched to N2 at room tempera-
ture, and then ethanol (~20 mL) and n-decane (100 mL) as standard
were added into the reactor. The reaction mixture was separated
by filtration and further diluted with ethanol and then was dried
with anhydrous Na2SO4. The products were analyzed by a gas chro-
matography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and a GC with a capillary
column and a flame ionization detector. Turnover frequencies
(TOFs) were calculated on the basis of the total metal amount in
the catalysts. The carbon balance was more than 98%.
All chemicals were analytical grade, purchased from Sinopharm
Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd., and used in this work as received with-
out purification. Commercial Al2O3 (159 m2 gÀ1), CeO2 (15 m2 gÀ1),
La2O3 (<2 m2 gÀ1), SiO2 (438 m2 gÀ1), TiO2 (38 m2 gÀ1), and ZrO2
(9 m2 gÀ1) were used for comparison. Deionized water was used
throughout all the experiments.
General procedure for catalyst preparation
Preparation of CeO2 support: In a typical synthesis, Ce(NO3)3·6H2O
(8.7 g) was dissolved in water (50 mL) at room temperature. Then,
an aqueous solution of Na2CO3 (0.5 molLÀ1) was added dropwise
to the above aqueous solution with vigorous stirring until the pH
value increased to approximately 7.5. The precipitate was filtered
and washed at least three times with deionized water, and finally
was dried at 1008C overnight and calcined in air at 5008C for 5 h
with a ramp rate of 58CminÀ1
.
Preparation of supported Pd catalysts: a series of xPd/CeO2 cata-
lysts with different Pd mass percentage (x=1.0%, 2%, 2.5%, 3.0%,
5.0%) were prepared by a simple impregnation method. Typically,
the as-prepared CeO2 powder (1 g) was dispersed into an aqueous
solution (15 mL) containing the desired amount of palladium ace-
tate (Pd(OAc)2) under stirring at room temperature for 2 h. The
mixture was stirred at 708C to evaporate water, and then was
dried in an oven at 1008C overnight. Finally, the obtained solid
was calcined at 3508C for 5 h.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Open Project of State Key
Laboratory of Advanced Special Steel of Shanghai University
(SKLASS2015-Z052), National Basic Research Program of China
(973 Program, No. 2014CB643403), the National Natural Science
&
ChemCatChem 2017, 9, 1 – 10
8
ꢀ 2017 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ÝÝ These are not the final page numbers!