7172
W.-J. Li / Electrochimica Acta 54 (2009) 7167–7172
depositedfromDMSOsolutioncontaining0.05 MTe4+ and0.0375 M
Bi3+ at E = −0.1 and −0.5 V. The film morphology was identified as
a polycrystalline assembly of hexagonal needles on the substrate
surface, as shown in Fig. 6a. The feature sizes are on the order of
200 nm × 20 nm.
When the Te4+ concentration near electrode is high (e.g. 0.05 M
Te4+), Te deposition is the dominant reaction. Te-rich deposits are
obtained in the potential range between −0.2 and −0.8 V. When the
Te4+ concentration near electrode is low (e.g. 0.01 M Te4+), Bi2Te3
deposition is the dominant reaction, and the atomic ratio of Bi to
Te in the films is close to 2/3 at potential negative than −0.4 V.
Te-rich composites are obtained via single potential step mode
with a pulse of 10–100 ms at E = −0.6 V followed by a pause of 1 s.
Short pulse time causes only little Bi3+ could reacts with Te.
The XRD patterns for films deposited at E = −0.4 and −0.7 V from
DMSO solution containing 0.01 M Te4+ and 0.0075 M Bi3+ are pre-
sented in Fig. 5b. The diffraction peaks are corresponding to the
(0 1 5), (1 1 0), (1 0 1 0) planes of Bi2Te3 compound according to the
powder diffraction file for JCPDF No. 15-0863 [16]. From the Harris
texture analysis, we can find the films obtained at E = −0.7 V has a
highly preferential orientation along the [0 1 5] direction compared
with the films obtained at E = −0.4 V. The film deposited at −0.4 and
−0.7 V was dense with granular structure, as shown in Fig. 6b and
c. The films deposited at −0.7 V were rougher because of the fast
growth.
References
[1] G.S. Nolas, J. Sharp, H.J. Goldsmith, Thermoelectrics: Basic Principles and New
Materials Developments, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001.
[2] D.M. Rowe, CRC Handbook of Thermoelectrics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1995.
[3] P. Magri, C. Boulanger, J.M. Lecuire, J. Mater. Chem. 6 (1996) 773.
[4] Y. Miyazaki, T. Kajitani, J. Cryst. Growth 229 (2001) 542.
[5] M. Martín-González, A.L. Prieto, R. Gronsky, T. Sands, A.M. Stacy, J. Electrochem.
Soc. 149 (2002) C546.
4. Conclusion
[6] M. Takahashi, Y. Muramatsu, T. Suzuki, M.S. Sato, M. Watanabe, K. Wakita, T.
Uchida, J. Electrochem. Soc. 150 (2003) C169.
[7] M. Takahashi, M. Kojima, S. Sato, N. Ohnisi, A. Nishiwaki, K. Wakita, T. Miyuki,
S. Ikeda, Y. Muramatsu, J. Appl. Phys. 96 (2004) 5582.
[8] S. Michel, S. Diliberto, C. Boulanger, N. Stein, J.M. Lecuire, J. Cryst. Growth 277
(2005) 274.
[9] W.J. Li, K.L. Hsueh, Thin Solid Films 515 (2007) 7847.
[10] W. Glatz, L. Durrer, E. Schwyter, C. Hierold, Electrochim. Acta 54 (2008) 755.
[11] M. Martín-González, A.L. Prieto, M.S. Knox, R. Gronsky, T. Sands, A.M. Stacy,
Chem. Mater. 15 (2003) 1676.
[12] A.L. Prieto, M. Martín-González, J. Keyani, R. Gronsky, T. Sands, A.M. Stacy, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 2388.
[13] J.G.N. Matias, J.F. Juliao, D.M. Soares, A. Gorenstein, J. Electroanal. Chem. 431
(1997) 163.
[14] H. Saloniemi, M. Kemel, M. Ritala, M. Leskelä, J. Electroanal. Chem. 482 (2000)
139.
[15] JCPDS card No. 36-1452, International Centre for Diffraction Data, PCPDFWIN
V. 1.30, 1997.
[16] JCPDS card No. 15-0863, International Centre for Diffraction Data, PCPDFWIN
V. 1.30, 1997.
We examined Bi2Te3 deposition in DMSO solutions by means of
simultaneous cyclic voltammetry and EQCM plus measured charge
accumulations and changes in deposit mass in situ. Bi2−xTe3+x films
could be obtained from DMSO solution containing 0.01 M Te4+
and 0.0075 M Bi3+in the potential range between −0.2 and −0.8 V.
The results obtained from simultaneous application of potentio-
static method and EQCM were used to propose a mechanism
about Bi2−xTe3+x deposition in DMSO solution. Firstly a thin layer
of Bi2−xTe3+x with inhomogeneous composition forms on the Au
surface until it is completely covered with the deposit. Then a
homogenous deposit eventually appears on the Bi2−xTe3+x surface.
Te films are obtained in the potential range between 0 and
−0.2 V, independent of the Te4+ concentration in DMSO. When
the applied potential is negative than −0.2 V, the film composition
is more dependent on Te4+ concentrations than on the potential.