Cho et al.
Highly Efficient Blue OLEDs Based on Diarylamine-Substituted Pyrene Derivatives
Tris(dibezylideneacetone)dipalladium(0) (0.069 mmol),
2-Dicyclohexylphosphino-2ꢀ,6ꢀ-dimethoxybiphenyl (0.11 mmol)
the OLEDs were measured with a Keithly 2400, Chroma
meter CS-1000A. Electroluminance was measured using a
Roper Scientific Pro 300i.
,
sodium tert-butoxide (9.72 mmol) (Yield: 40.5%).
1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3ꢁ [ꢂ ppm]; 8.20
(d, J = 8.15 Hz, 2H), 8.10 (d, J = 9.18 Hz, 2H), 8.02
(d, J = 9.25 Hz, 2H), 7.87 (d, J = 8.10 Hz, 2H), 7.42
(d, J = 8.92 Hz, 4H), 7.34 (t, J = 7.38 Hz, 4H), 7.26
(d, J = 8.43 Hz, 4H), 7.16 (t, J = 7.32 Hz, 2H), 6.90
(d, J = 8.91 Hz, 4H); APCI-MS m/z = 586[M+]; Anal.
Calcd for C42H26N4: C, 85.98; H, 4.47; N, 9.55. Found:
C, 85.23; H, 4.15; N, 8.97.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Syntheses of three blue fluorescent materials 1–3 are
shown in Scheme 1.
Density functional theory (DFT) calculations for
blue fluorescent materials 1–3 using the Becke’s three
parameterized Lee-Yang-Parr (B3LYP) functional with
6-31G∗ basis sets using a suite of Gaussian programs were
carried out to understand the observed properties of the
materials 1–3 on molecular levels. The electron cloud dis-
tributions of LUMO in materials 1–3 are mainly located
in pyrene moiety which is center of molecules. In mate-
rial 1 and 3, the electron cloud distributions of HOMO are
spread widely throughout the molecules. And the electron
cloud distributions of HOMO in material 2 are located
in throughout the molecule apart from two phenyl rings
introduced into diarylamine.
As shown in Figure 1, three-dimensional structures of
materials 1–3 demonstrated that molecules have twisted
structure because of introducing of diarylamine moieties
at 1,6-positions of pyrene. The dihedral angles between
pyrene and benzonitrile moiety substituted at the 1,6-
position of pyrene were calculated to be 56ꢁ, 57ꢁ, and 67ꢁ
2.1.2. 4,4ꢀ-[1,6-Pyrenediylbis((3,5-
diphenyl)phenylamino)]bis-Benzonitrile (2)
The synthetic procedure for material 2 was simi-
lar to that described for material 1 using 4-((1,3-
diphenyl)phenylamino)benzonitrile (3.06 mmol) instead of
4-(phenylamino)benzonitrile, the desired compound was
obtained as a yellow solid (Yield: 51.3%). 1H-NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3ꢁ [ꢂ ppm]; 8.22 (d, J = 8.15 Hz, 2H),
8.11 (d, J = 9.18 Hz, 2H), 8.01 (d, J = 9.25 Hz, 2H), 7.86
(d, J = 8.10 Hz, 2H), 7.55 (m, 8H), 7.41 (d, J = 8.92 Hz,
4H), 7.33 (m, 12H), 7.28 (d, J = 8.43 Hz, 4H), 7.10
(s, 2H), 6.95 (s, 2H); APCI-MS m/z = 890[M+]; Anal.
Calcd for C66H42N4: C, 88.96; H, 4.75; N, 6.29. Found:
C, 88.35; H, 4.47; N, 6.11.
IP: 193.56.67.84 On: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 12:42:44
2.1.3. 4,4ꢀ-[1,6-Pyrenediylbis(9,10-dimethylfluoren-2-yl-
for materials 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Also, the dihedral
angles between pyrene and other aromatic ring moieties
Copyright: American Scientific Publishers
amino)]bis-Benzonitrile (3)
Delivered by Ingenta
(benzene, diphenylbenzene, fluorene) were calculated to be
67ꢁ, 69ꢁ, and 35ꢁ for materials 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
These twisted structural features of materials would effec-
tively suppress the aggregation-quenching by ꢄ–ꢄ stack-
ing in solid state, which is leading to electroluminescent
(EL) efficiency.14
The synthetic procedure for material 3 was similar
to that described for 1 using 4-(9,10-dimethylfluoren-
2-yl-amino)benzonitrile (3.06 mmol) instead of
4-(phenylamino)benzonitrile, the desired compound was
obtained as a yellow solid (Yield: 37.5%). 1H-NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3ꢁ [ꢂ ppm]; 8.19 (d, J = 8.15 Hz, 2H),
8.12 (d, J = 9.18 Hz, 2H), 8.03 (d, J = 9.25 Hz, 2H), 7.82
(d, J = 8.10 Hz, 2H), 7.54 (m, 6H), 7.40 (d, J = 8.92 Hz,
4H), 7.33 (m, 4H), 7.28 (d, J = 8.43 Hz, 4H), 7.12
(d, J = 8.53 Hz, 2H), 6.93 (s, 2H), 0.51 (s, 12H); APCI-
MS m/z = 818[M+]; Anal. Calcd for C60H42N4: C,87.99;
H, 5.17; N, 6.84. Found: C, 87.32; H, 4.95; N, 6.51.
The UV-Visible absorption spectra of materials 1–3 and
emission spectrum of ꢅ, ꢆ-ADN in dilute dichloromethane
solution are shown in Figure 2(a). And the photolumi-
nescence (PL) spectra of materials 1–3 in dilute solution
Figure 2(b). Their photophysical properties are summa-
rized in Table I. In Figure 2(a), the maximum absorption
wavelength (ꢇmaxꢁ of materials 1–3 appeared at 243 nm,
247 nm and 270 nm in dilute dichloro methane solution
(1×10−5 M), respectively. Also, all materials (1–3) exhib-
ited strong absorption peaks near 330 nm and 405 nm.
And the maximum emission wavelength of materials 1–3
occurred at 459, 458 and 476 nm in dichloromethane solu-
tion (1 ×10−5 M), respectively, in blue region of the vis-
ible spectrum. The maximum intensity of PL spectra of
material 3 showed more red-shifted than material 1 and 2.
The conjugation length of the aryl group in material 3
is longer than other materials (1 and 2), which is leading
to red-shifted emission.15
2.2. OLED Fabrication and Measurements
For OLED fabrication, indium-tin-oxide (ITO) thin films
coated on glass substrates were used, which were
30 ꢃ/square of the sheet resistively and 1000 Å thick. The
ITO-coated glass was cleaned in an ultrasonic bath through
the following sequence: washes with acetone, methyl alco-
hol, and distilled water, storage in isopropyl alcohol for
48 h, and drying with a N2 gas gun.
The substrates were treated by O2 plasma under 2 ×
10−2 Torr at 125 W for 2 min. All organic materi-
als and metal were deposited under high vacuum (5 ×
10−7 Torr). The current density (J), luminance (L), lumi-
nous efficiency (LE), and CIE chromaticity coordinates of
To investigate the EL properties of materi-
als 1–3, OLED devices A–C were fabricated as
J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 19, 1056–1060, 2019
1057