RSC Advances
Paper
1
resulting in the deposition of PEO nanobers onto the was dissolved in CDCl3 and yield was determined by H-NMR-
collector foil.
spectroscopy by using dibromomethane as an internal
standard.
Chemical vapor deposition of ethinyl-functionalized poly(p-
xylylene)
Acknowledgements
Rectangular pieces of 4.5 ꢂ 5.5 cm of the prepared PEO ber
mats were mounted inside the deposition chamber and
subsequently coated with ethinyl-functionalized PPX using a
custom made CVD setup (see ESI†). The vaporization chamber
was lled with 150 mg of the ethinyl-functionalized [2.2]-p-
cyclophane precursor and set to 100 ꢃC. The following pyrolysis
We thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinscha (DFG) for
supporting our work.
References
´
1 Immobilization of catalysts: (a) J. M. Fraile, J. I. Garcıa and
ꢃ
zone was set to 580 C. Whereas the deposition chamber was
J. A. Mayoral, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 360; (b)
A. F. Trinidade, P. M. P. Gois and C. A. M. Alfonso, Chem.
Rev., 2009, 109, 418; (c) R. Akiyama and S. Kobayashi,
Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 594.
2 Immobilization of organocatalysts: (a) M. Benaglia,
A. Puglisi and F. Cozzi, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103, 3401; (b)
M. Gruttadauria, F. Giacalone and R. Noto, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2008, 37, 1666; (c) T. E. Kristensen and T. Hansen, Eur. J.
Org. Chem., 2010, 17, 3179.
kept at room temperature, the connecting transportation zone
was set to 300 ꢃC. The pressure was kept below 2.0 ꢂ 10ꢁ2 mbar
and aer 1 h, the vaporization temperature was raised 10 ꢃC
ꢃ
every 30 min until 150 C. Aer the CVD setup reached room
temperature, the coated ber mats were ipped and the back
layer was subsequently coated as described above. The resulting
core–shell ber mats were homogeneously coated and slightly
yellow.
3 C. J. Brown and A. C. Farthing, Nature, 1949, 164, 915.
4 H. Hopf, Angew. Chem., 2008, 120, 8854; Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2008, 47, 9808.
5 W. F. Gorham, J. Polym. Sci., Part A-1: Polym. Chem., 1966, 4,
3027.
Solvent extraction of the inner polymer template
The prepared core–shell ber mats were introduced into water
in order to extract the inner PEO bers. The aqueous phase was
renewed every 24 h until the weight was consistent.
6 (a) L. Bandorenko, I. Dix, H. Hinrichs and H. Hopf, Synthesis,
2004, 16, 2751; (b) H. Nandivada, H.-Y. Chen, L. Bandorenko
and J. Lahann, Angew. Chem., 2006, 118, 3438; Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 3360; (c) H.-Y. Chen, J. H. Lai, X. Jiang and
J. Lahann, Adv. Mater., 2008, 20, 3474.
General procedure for the oxidation of benzyl alcohol using
catalyst system A
A solution (3.66 mL) of benzyl alcohol (0.40 M, 1.47 mmol,
1.0 eq.) and hexadecane (0.40 M, 1.47 mmol, 1.0 eq.; internal
standard) in dichloromethane was mixed with a solution of KBr
(aq., 0.5 M, 0.29 mL, 0.15 mmol, 0.1 eq.) at 0 ꢃC. Then a solution
of NaOCl (aq., 0.35 M, 5.24 mL, buffered by NaHCO3 to pH 8.9,
7 X. Dong and J. Lahann, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 2012, 33,
1459.
¨
8 (a) M. Stasiak, C. Roben, N. Rosenberger, F. Schleth,
A. Studer, A. Greiner and J. H. Wendorff, Polymer, 2007, 48,
5208; (b) M. Stasiak, A. Studer, A. Greiner and
ꢃ
1.83 mmol, 1.25 eq.) was added at 0 C. The TEMPO-function-
alized PPX-nanotubes A (20.0 mg, 36.6 mmol, 2.5 mol% nitro-
xide) were xed in a Teon holder (see Fig. 1 in the ESI†) and
dipped into the reaction mixture. By removal of the catalyst A
the reaction was stopped and the product was isolated by
rinsing the ber mat with dichloromethane (3 ꢂ 5 mL). The
combined phases were dried over MgSO4. Conversion of the
reaction was determined by GC analysis.
¨
J. H. Wendorff, Chem.–Eur. J., 2007, 13, 6150; (c) C. Roben,
M. Stasiak, B. Janza, A. Greiner, J. H. Wendorff and
A. Studer, Synthesis, 2008, 14, 2163.
9 Reviews for electrospinning: (a) D. Li and Y. Xia, Adv. Mater.,
2004, 16, 1151; (b) A. Greiner and J. H. Wendorff, Angew.
Chem., 2007, 119, 5770; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46,
5670.
10 M. Bognitzki, H. Hou, M. Ishaque, T. Frese, M. Hellwig,
C. Schwarte, A. Scharper, J. H. Wendorff and A. Greiner,
Adv. Mater., 2000, 12, 637.
General procedure for the CuAAC with catalyst system B
Catalyst system B (72.0 mg, 12 mmol, 5 mol% copper) was xed
¨
using the custom made sample mount and a solution of benzyl 11 J. P. Lindner, C. Roben, A. Studer, M. Stasiak, R. Ronge,
azide (0.25 mmol, 1.0 eq.) and phenyl propargyl ether
(0.27 mmol, 1.1 eq.) in dry methanol (5 mL) were added. In the
A. Greiner and H.-J. Wendorff, Angew. Chem., 2009, 121,
9035; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 8874.
rst reaction cycle aer longer storage time of the ber mat, 12 Reviews: (a) T. Vogler and A. Studer, Synthesis, 2008, 1979; (b)
sodium L-ascorbate (5 mg, 0.02 mmol, 0.1 eq.) was added to the
solution to reduce oxidized Cu(II) to Cu(I). The reaction mixture
was heated to 60 ꢃC for 3–19 h. Subsequently, the sample mount
and the tube material were washed several times with methanol
and the washed tube material was dried carefully by passing an
argon stream followed by drying under vacuum. Aer removal
of the solvent from the reaction mixture, the obtained residue
L. Tebben and A. Studer, Angew. Chem., 2009, 123, 5138;
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 5034; (c) A. E. J. de Nooy,
A. C. Besemer and H. van Bekkum, Synthesis, 1996, 10,
¨
1153; (d) W. Adam, C. R. Saha-Moler and
P. A. Ganeshpure, Chem. Rev., 2001, 101, 3499; (e)
R. A. Sheldon, I. W. C. E. Arends, G.-T. Ten Brink and
A. Dijksman, Acc. Chem. Res., 2002, 35, 774.
25980 | RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 25976–25981
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013