4
Tetrahedron
Meanwhile, the reaction mechanism is proposed by in situ
IR.
Acknowledgments
Financial support from the National Basic Research Program of
China (Grant No: 2012CB720302) and the National Key Research
and Development Program of China (2016YFF0102503) are
gratefully acknowledged.
Supplementary data
Experimental procedures and full characterization for all
compounds associated with this article can be found.
Figure 5. Kinetics of sulfination reaction. Conditions: acetanilide
(2.0 mmol), DABSO (0.5 equiv), AlCl3 (8.0 equiv), DCE (10 mL),
25 oC.
References
1. Kalle, W. Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie. 1861, 119, 153-164.
2. (a) Gilman, H.; Smith, E. W.; Oatfield, H. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1934, 56, 1412-1414. (b) Kulka, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1950, 72, 1215-
1218. (c) Field, L.; Grunwald, F. A. J. Org. Chem. 1951, 16, 946-953.
3. (a) Truce, W. E.; Lyons, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73, 126-128.
(b) Allen, J. P.; Rehl, W. R.; Fuchs, P. E. J. Org. Chem. 1955, 20, 1237-
1239. (c) Pinnick, H. W.; Reynolds, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 160-
161. (d) Umierski, N.; Manolikakes, G. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 4972-4975.
4. Pelzer, G.; Keim, W. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 1999, 139, 235-238.
5. (a) Filby, W. G.; Günther, K.; Penzhorn, R. D. J. Org. Chem. 1973,
38, 4070-4071. (b) Kamiyama, T.; Enomoto, S.; Inoue, M. Chem.
Pharm. Bull. 1988, 36, 2652-2653.
6. Zhang, W.; Luo, M. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 2980-2983.
7.(a) Wu, J.; Ye, S. Chem. Commun, 2012, 48, 7753-7755. (b)
Shavnya, A.; Coffey, S. B.; Smith, A. C. Org. lett. 2013, 15, 6226-6229.
8. Johnson, M. W.; Bagley, S. W.; Mankad, N. P. Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2014, 53, 4404-4407.
9. For reviews of insertion of SO2: (a) J. Wu.; G. Liu.; C. Fan. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 1592; (b) N. Blanchard.; P. Bisseret. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 5393; (c) M. C. Willis.; A. S. Deeming.; E. J.
Emmett.; C. S. Richards-Taylor. Synthesis. 2014, 46, 2701; (d) M. C.
Willis.; E. J. Emmett. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2015, 4, 602; (e) J. Wu.; D.
Zheng. "Sulfur Dioxide Insertion Reactions for Organic Synthesis",
Nature Springer: Berlin, 2017. (f) Wu, J.; Qiu, G.; Zhou, K.; Gao, L.
Org. Chem. Front. 2018, 5, DOI: 10.1039/C7QO01073G.
10. (a) Baskin, J. M.; Wang, Z. Tetrahedron letters. 2002, 43, 8479-
8483. (b) Gianatassio, R.; Kawamura, S.; Eprile, C. L.; Foo, K.; Ge, J.;
Burns, A. C.; Collins, M. R.; Baran, P. S. Angew, Chem. Int. Ed. 2014,
53, 9851-9855. (c) Gauthier Jr, D. R.; Yoshikawa, N. Organic letters.
2016, 18, 5994-5997.
As we known, for the two reactants with the same initial
concentration, if the reaction was a second-order reaction,
the ratio of the product concentration to the reactant
concentration was a linear function of time. We inferred the
essence of this reaction was that under the catalysis of
AlCl3, acetanilide reacted with SO2 to produce sulfinates.
One DABSO was equivalent to two SO2. Our results
coincided with it and concluded that this reaction was
second order, also consistent with the law: Friedel Crafts
reaction is a second-order reaction. On the basis of the
above-mentioned experimental observations, a plausible
mechanism for this reaction was shown in Scheme 2. It
started with the reaction of DABSO and AlCl3 to form
intermedia A, which gradually decomposed into DABCO
and the AlCl3 adduct of SO2 B. DABCO reacted with AlCl3
to give complex C. Meanwhile, the arene attacked B to
generate intermedia D, which yielded the desired
arylsulfinates E.
Scheme 2. Proposed mechanism for the sulfination reaction of
arenes with DABSO and AlCl3
11. Knoevenagel; Kenner, J. Chem. Ber. 1908, 41, 3315-3322.
12. Santos, P. S.; Mello, M. T. S. J. Mol. Struct. 1988,178, 121-133.
13. Willis, M.C.; Nguyen, B.; Emmett, E.J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010,
132, 16372-16373.
14. Willis, M. C.; Deeming, A.S.; Russell, C.J.; Hennessy, A.J. Org.
lett. 2014, 16, 150-153.
15. Willis, M. C.; Deeming, A.S.; Russell, C.J. Angew. Chem. 2016,
128, 757-760.
16. Wu, J.; Ye, S. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 7753-7755.
17. Wu, J.; Zheng, D.; An, Y.; Li, Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53,
2451-2454.
18. (a) Wu, J.; Liu, T.; Zhou, W. Organic letters. 2017, 19, 6638-
6641. (b) Wu, J.; Xia, H.; An, Y.; Zeng, X. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53,
12548-12551. (c) Wu, J.; Xiang, Y.; Kuang, Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2017,
23, 6996-6999. (d) Wu, J.; Zhang, J.; An, Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23,
9477 – 9480. (e) Wu, J.; Yu, J.; Mao, R.; Wang, Q. Org. Chem. Front.
2017, 4, 617-621. (f) Wu, J.; Zheng, D.; Yu, J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2016, 55, 1–6. (g) Wu, J.; Li, Y.; Zheng, D.; Li, Z. Org. Chem. Front.
2016, 3, 574-578. (h) Wu, J.; Mao, R.; Zheng, D.; Xia, H. Org. Chem.
Front. 2016, 3, 693-696.
19. (a) Martial, L. Synlett. 2013, 24, 1595-1596. (b) Wu, J.; Liu, G.;
Fan, C. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 1592-1599. (c) Odell, L. R.;
Skillinghaug, B.; Rydfjord, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 533-536. (d)
Cheng, J.; Yuan, J.; Yu, J.; Jiang, Y. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15,
Conclusion
We have described a convenient and safe method for the
preparation of aryl sulfinates from arenes and DABSO
under mild conditions. The reaction proceeds smoothly
from 0 oC to room temperature to afford a number of aryl
sulfinates from inexpensive and commercially available
materials without the need for any ligands and additives.