Organic Letters
Letter
was obtained in only 0.5% yield in this system. The same
experiment was repeated twice and almost reproduced the
result (6−7% yield, 9−16% inversion). Incidentally, replacing
Scheme 3. Outline of the Mechanism of the Reaction
between Benzyl Alcohol and 4-Nitrobenzoic Acid under the
“Fully Catalytic” Conditions
1
-phenylphospholane-1-oxide with another cyclic phosphine
oxide (5-phenyldibenzophosphole oxide), described in authors’
7
publication, provided only a trace amount of the product 1
Our reaction conditions might partially differ from those of
Buonomo and Aldrich. First, suppliers of the reagents and
solvents used would not be the same in each case. We tested
the reactions using reagents from different suppliers, with no
impact to the outcome (see SI for our case). Second, our
method for the molecular sieves activation differs from that of
Information that “molecular sieves were activated by heating
nitrobenzoic acid solely in the presence of molecular sieves, as
well as in the presence of molecular sieves and phenylsilane. No
formation of ester 3 could be observed in any of these cases,
9a
at 200 °C under reduced pressure”, but we have recently
demonstrated that such a method is insufficient for activating
6
molecular sieves in the catalytic Mitsunobu reaction. There-
ruling out S 1 pathways mediated by the benzoic acid
N
fore, we used molecular sieves activated strictly by heating with
a heat gun (ca. 450 °C) or Bunsen burner (>1000 °C) under
reduced pressure (0.1−0.9 mbar), and at least this change
should work advantageously in our experiments. In the present
study, we found out that the impact of molecular sieves was
significantly great in reactions conducted in THF. Activating
molecular sieves by Bunsen burner instead of a heat gun proved
beneficial to our catalytic system in THF (Scheme 2, eq 1).
This is somehow different from our recent observation where
both methods of activation resulted in comparable yields of the
Mitsunobu reaction in toluene and is probably a result of the
hygroscopic nature of THF. On the other hand, the difference
in the molecular sieves activation method affected the
esterification of neither benzyl alcohol (Figure 1, entry 1) nor
derivative or the silane (SI). The reaction between benzyl
alcohol and 4-nitrobenzoic acid in the presence of only Fe(Pc)
and molecular sieves resulted in the formation of benzaldehyde
1
11
(
75% yield by H NMR) and trace amounts of ester 3 (SI).
Similarly, when phenylsilane was added into the reaction
mixture, no ester product was detected (SI).
By replacing benzyl alcohol with 3-phenylpropan-1-ol in the
fully catalytic conditions, the corresponding ester 4 was hardly
produced (<5% yield, Figure 1, entry 3). The above-mentioned
results imply that Fe(Pc)-catalyzed oxidation−reduction
condensation might be ruled out in the formation of ester 3.
A remaining possibility is that an intermediate, generated in situ
from Fe(Pc), the phosphine oxide, and phenylsilane, induces an
SN1 reaction as a Lewis acid. This putative Lewis acid might
slightly include Fischer-type esterification in the reaction of
(−)-ethyl lactate or 3-phenylpropan-1-ol. Incidentally, another
model reaction of benzyl alcohol using Fe(Pc) and
tricyclohexylphosphine provided no ester product, supporting
that phenylsilane might participate in formation of the
(
−)-ethyl lactate (Figure 1, entry 2). Third, the authors used
oxygen generated by sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) and
hydrogen peroxide (H O ). Although we typically employed
2
2
commercially available oxygen filled in a gas cylinder, for
comparison reasons, we repeated the reaction from entry 1 in
2
2
yet, with no change in the result (SI). Therefore, the above-
mentioned differences in the reaction conditions are not an
essential issue here.
We previously reported that our system catalytic in the azo
reagent did not work well when a trialkylphosphine, such as tri-
n-butylphosphine, was used as a stoichiometric phosphine
6
It could be that the pathway in which ester 3 is produced in
the “fully catalytic system” has been misinterpreted, and it
might come from an inappropriate selection of the model
reagent. Probably, the highly nucleophilic phosphines cause
structural or functional changes in iron phthalocyanine by
strong coordination to the metal center. A green spot having
low polarity was observed on TLC analysis of the mixture of tri-
n-butylphosphine and iron phthalocyanine. It is assumed that
this spot belongs to a complex of iron phthalocyanine with the
phosphine. Under the conditions of the “fully catalytic system”,
a similar spot was observed probably because the cyclic
phosphine that formed in situ also has strong nucleophilicity
(SI). Thus, our system catalytic in the azo reagent might be
incompatible with the system catalytic in the phosphine when
the cyclic phosphine is used.
In conclusion, our preliminary results suggested two
problems for the report by Buonomo and Aldrich. First, the
protocol of the catalytic Mitsnobu reaction in the phosphine
appears insufficiently optimized. Second, the proposed “fully
catalytic system” does not work as the catalytic Mitsunobu
reaction. The former problem might be solved by strict
optimization of the reaction conditions. The latter issue is more
significant because the reaction does not seem to undergo the
Mitsunobu process. Of course, we do not fully rule out the
future feasibility of this ideal concept by further studies. In our
7
alcohol substrates. Namely, these reactions were performed
with benzyl alcohols at elevated temperature (70 °C), which
might induce the formation of a benzyl cation in the presence
of 4-nitrobenzoic acid to provide the ester via the SN1
mechanism (Scheme 3). Indeed, the authors suggested the
possibility of formation of the benzyl cation in the reaction
between 4-trifluoromethylbenzyl alcohol and 4-nitrobenzoic
9b
acid in the presence of phenylsilane. Yet, another pathway is
possible. For instance, typical dehydrated condensation or
1
0
Fe(Pc)-catalyzed oxidation−reduction condensation would
give ester products.
To shed light on this, we conducted control experiments in
the reaction between benzyl alcohol and 4-nitrobenzoic acid. By
performing the reaction in the absence of the hydrazine
catalyst, product 3 was obtained in almost identical yield (36%)
as that of the reaction with the hydrazine catalyst, which
indicates that the hydrazine catalyst does not participate in the
authors’ “fully catalytic system” (Figure 1, entry 1, third run). In
addition, we tested the reaction between benzyl alcohol and 4-
C
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX