6104
J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 6104-6105
Sch em e 1
Tr a n sfer Hyd r ogen a tion w ith Ru th en iu m
Com p lexes of Ch ir a l
(P h osp h in ofer r ocen yl)oxa zolin es
Tarek Sammakia* and Eric L. Stangeland
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of
Colorado Boulder, Colorado 80309-0215
Ta ble 1a
Received J une 18, 1997
Transfer hydrogenation using 2-propanol as a source
of hydrogen is an attractive method for the reduction of
ketones to alcohols. The reaction utilizes inexpensive
reagents, is simple to perform, and does not require the
use of reactive metal hydrides or hydrogen. Because the
reaction is governed by mass action, reduction of the
ketone can be driven to high conversion by using iso-
propanol as the solvent. The classical variant of this
reaction, the Meerwein-Pondorff-Verley reduction, typi-
cally utilizes a stoichiometric amount of an aluminum
entry
R
time (h)
% conversionb
%eec
1
2
3
4
5
Me (2)
Bn (3)
i-Pr (4)
Ph (5)
t-Bu (6)
d
8
6
3
6
6
92
93
93
93
51
5
92
90
92
94
94
-
alkoxide as
a promoter. Recently, Backvall and
Chowdhury showed that 0.1% RuCl2(PPh3)3 (1) is an
effective catalyst for this transformation, provided that
about 2% NaOH is present.1 This discovery has lead to
the development of asymmetric processes which utilize
Ru catalysts that are modified with chiral ligands.2,3 Most
notably, Noyori has developed catalysts which will reduce
aryl alkyl ketones to the corresponding alcohols in
excellent yields and enantioselectivities.4 We have previ-
ously described the preparation of chiral ferrocenylox-
azoline complexes which posses complexation induced
chirality (i.e., “planar chirality”).5,6 These complexes are
prepared in high yield and with excellent diastereose-
lectivity via the diastereotopic group selective metalation
of the parent ferrocenyloxazoline using sec-BuLi in ether
containing 1 equiv of TMEDA. We have used this
method for the preparation of chiral (phosphinoferroce-
nyl)oxazolines,7 and describe in this article their use as
6
20
b
a
See text for conditions. The % conversion was determined
by capillary GC using dodecane as an internal standard. c Enan-
tioselectivities were measured by capillary GC using a Supelco
â-dex 120 column (per-methylated â-cyclodextrin chiral phase) and
d
are reproducible to (1%. The reaction was performed without
the ferrocene ligand.
ligands in conjunction with 1 in the enantioselective
transfer hydrogenation of aryl alkyl ketones.
Our initial efforts focused on screening a variety of
ferrocenyloxazolines in which the substituent on the
oxazoline is varied in order to ascertain its effect on the
reaction (Table 1). We chose acetophenone as our test
substrate and performed the reaction at room tempera-
ture in 2-propanol at a concentration of 0.125 M using
0.2% 1, 0.26% of the ferrocene complex, and 6% potas-
sium isopropoxide. The catalysts were prepared in situ
by the addition of our ligand to 1 in 2-propanol followed
by heating the solution to reflux for 1 h. Catalysts
prepared in this fashion are significantly more reactive
than 1 (ligand accelerated catalysis,8 Table 1, compare
entries 1-5 with entry 6). All of the ligands we examined
provide enantioselectivities in excess of 90%, with the
phenyl- and tert-butyl-substituted oxazolines providing
94% ee (Table 1, entries 4 and 5). Furthermore, all of
the reactions containing the ferrocene ligands proceeded
to greater than 90% conversion as shown by GC, with
the exception of the tert-butyl-substituted oxazoline 6
which only proceeded to about 50% conversion (Table 1,
entry 5). Thus, the phenyl-substituted oxazoline was
deemed to provide the optimal combination of conversion
and selectivity.
(1) Chowdhury, R. L.; Backvall, J .-E. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1991, 1063.
(2) For a review, see: Zassinovich, G.; Mestroni, G.; Gladiali, S.
Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 1051. Gladiali, S.; Pinna, L.; Delogu, G.;
DeMartin, S.; Zassinovich, G.; Mestroni, G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1990, 1, 635. Muller, D.; Umbricht, G.; Weber, B.; Pfaltz, A. Helv. Chim.
Acta 1991, 74, 232. Krasik, P.; Alper, H. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 4347.
Yang, H.; Alvarez, M.; Lugan, N.; Mathieu, R. J . Chem. Soc. Chem.
Commun. 1995, 1721. Langer, T.; Helmchen, G. Tetrahedron Lett.
1996, 37, 1381. Langer, T.; J anssen, J .; Helmchen, G. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1996, 7, 1599. J iang, Q.; Van Plew, D.; Murtuza, S.; Zhang,
X. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 797. J iang, Y.; J iang, Q.; Zhu, G.; Zhang,
X. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 215.
(3) For other metal-based systems, see: Evans, D. A.; Nelson, S.
G.; Gagne´, M. R.; Muci, A. R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9800; Genet,
J .-P.; Ratovelomanana-Vidal, V.; Pinel, C. Synlett, 1993, 478. Gamez,
P.; Fache, F.; Mangeney, P.; Lemaire, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34,
6897. Gamez, P.; Fache, F.; Lemaire, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1995, 6, 705. Varghese, J .; Iyers, S. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1995, 465;
(4) Noyori, R.; Hashiguchi, S. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 97. Haack,
K. J .; Hashiguci, S.; Fujii, A.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 285. Hashiguci, S.; Fujii, A.; Haack, K. J .;
Matsumura, K.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1997, 36, 285.
(5) (a) Sammakia, T.; Latham, H. A.; Schaad, D. R. J . Org. Chem.
1995, 60, 10; (b) Sammakia, T.; Latham, H. A. J . Org. Chem. 1995,
60, 6002. (c) Sammakia, T.; Latham, H. A. J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61,
1629.
We have examined the scope of this method for the
reduction of aryl alkyl ketones using ligand 5 as shown
in Table 2. All reactions were initially attempted at room
temperature; however, we found that the reductions of
the more hindered or electron rich substrates did not
proceed to completion. When these substrates were
reduced at elevated temperatures, the reactions pro-
(6) For related work on the metalation of ferrocene oxazolines, see:
Richards, C. J .; Damalidis, T.; Hibbs, D. E.; Hursthouse, M. B. Synlett
1995, 74. Nishibayashi, Y.; Uemura, S. Synlett 1995, 79. Richards, C.
J .; Hibbs, D. E.; Hursthouse, M. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3748.
Park, J .; Lee, S.; Ahn, K. H.; Cho, C.-W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36,
7263. Richards, C. J .; Mulvaney, W. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996,
7, 1419. Zhang, W.; Hirao, I.; Ikeda, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 4545.
Zhang, W.; Adachi, Y.; Ikeda, I. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996, 7, 451.
Ahn, K. H.; Cho, C.-W.; Baek, H.-H.; Park, J .; Lee, S. J . Org. Chem.
1996, 61, 4937.
(7) For examples of the use of related ligands in asymmetric
catalysis, see: Nishibayashi, Y.; Segawa, K.; Ohe, K.; Uemura, S.
Organometallics 1995, 14, 5486. Richards, C. J .; Hibbs, D. E.; Hurst-
house, M. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3745. Zhang, W.; Hirao, T.;
Ikeda, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 4545; Richards, C. J .; Mulvaney,
A. W. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996, 7, 1419. Zhang, W. B.; Kida, T.;
Nakatsuji, Y.; Ikeda, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 7995.
(8) Berrisford, D. J .; Bolm, C.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 1059.
S0022-3263(97)01104-3 CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society