K.P. Sharma, P.J. John / Process Biochemistry 46 (2011) 240–244
2.5. Effect of pH and temperature on enzyme activity
241
to tannase sequence of S. lugdunensis. But tannase of L. plantarum
did not show any similarity in size, pH optima and kinetic con-
stant to that of Aspergillus oryzae. So the present investigation was
designed to characterize tannase at molecular level in Enterobac-
ter sp. not only because of its importance in bioremediation, animal
nutrition and pharmaceuticals but also because of inadequate infor-
mation about tannase gene in literature till date.
Effect of pH on purified enzyme was studied over a pH range of 4.0–6.5. The
buffer systems used were 50 mM citrate buffer for pH 4.0–5.5 and 50 mM phos-
phate buffer for pH 6.0 and 6.5. To study the effect of temperature, the activity
was determined at different temperatures (25–60 C) under standard enzyme assay
conditions.
◦
2
.6. Kinetic constant of Enetrobacter sp. tannase
Kinetic constant of tannase for most commonly used substrate methyl gallate
1–10 mM) was determined. The reactions were conducted under standard assay
2. Materials and methods
(
conditions. Km value was calculated out using the Lineweaver–Burk transformation
of Michaelis–Menten equation.
2.1. Chemicals
All chemicals unless specified otherwise were obtained from Sigma Chemical,
USA and were of certified reagent grade. Rhodanine was purchased from Merck-
Schuchardt, Germany. Sephadex G-100 was supplied by Pharmacia Fine Chemicals,
Sweden and DEAE cellulose was obtained from GE healthcare, USA. Chemicals and
reagents used in gene identification and cloning were purchased from Invitrogen,
USA, and Bangalore Genei, India. Dialysis tubing of 10–12 kDa cut off and bacterio-
logical medium were purchased from Hi-media, Mumbai, India.
2.7. Isolation of genomic DNA
Genomic DNA was isolated from Enterobacter sp. by following the methodology
of Laing et al. [18]. The purity and amount of DNA was calculated spectrophoto-
metrically. Isolated genomic DNA was subjected to PCR along with various sets of
degenerate primers.
2
.8. PCR amplification, cloning and sequencing of tannase gene
2.2. Microorganism and growth conditions
The tannase gene sequences from five members of different classes (␣,  and ␥)
A Gram negative bacterium which was identified as Enterobacter sp. on the
of phylum proteobacteria (Klebsiella sp., Pseudomonas sp., Ralstonia sp., Burkholderia
sp. and Roseovarius sp.) were aligned. Four sets of degenerate primers were designed
from various locations of alignment file. Following pairs of primers were used to
basis of morphological, biochemical and 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence fea-
tures, isolated from normal soil to purify and characterize tannase and tannase gene.
®
ꢀ
Escherichia coli DH5 ␣ and pGEM T Easy (Promega, Madison, USA) were used for
amplify tannase gene sequence in isolated organism; F1: 5 -Cgg HTg Cgg Ygg NYT
ꢀ ꢀ ꢀ ꢀ
gTg Cgg SA-3 ; R1:5 -CCR TgC CAS Agg ATM AAK YTT gCC gCC-3 , F2: 5 -ggY TgC TCN
cloning of tannase gene sequences. Enterobacter culture was maintained on a solid
medium containing 0.05% of each KH2PO4, K2HPO4 and MgSO4, 0.3% NH4NO3, 0.5%
tannic acid and 2% agar. E. coli DH5 ␣ cells were maintained on nutrient agar.
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
AAY ggN ggN CgC VAR gCg-3 ; R2: 5 -AAg ARS CgC gCR AAN gNC STS NgC-3 , F3:
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
5 -gAN TTC gAC ggC ATY NTC gCN ggC-3 ; R3: 5 -ATC ATY TTg CCR CCN CgN T-3 , F4:
-CBg AYg ANT TCg ACg gYA TCN TCg NC-3 ; R4: 5 -CCg CCN CgC CAR TgN BDC ATN
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
5
ꢀ
CCN ggC-3 . The PCR mixture (25 l) consisted of 2.5 l of 10× buffer containing
2
.3. Enzyme assay
10 mM MgCl2, 0.4 l of each dNTP (10 mM) 1 l of each forward and reverse primer
(
10 M), 2 l of template (100 ng) and 0.25 l of Taq DNA polymerase (5 U/ml). PCR
Tannase activity was determined spectrophotometrically by the method given
was carried out in a thermal cycler [Gene Amp PCR system 9700 (Applied Biosys-
◦
by Sharma et al. [15]. In this method tannase reacts with methyl gallate and releases
gallic acid which reacts subsequently with rhodanine and forms a complex. The
formation of above complex (gallic acid and rhodanine complex) was recorded at
tem, USA)] according to a programme encompassing initial denaturation at 94 C for
◦
◦
◦
3 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94 C for 30 s, 58 C for 1 min, 72 C for 2 min and final
◦
extension at 72 C for 5 min. PCR products were electrophoresed on 1% agarose gel
5
20 nm.
in 1× Tris–acetate–EDTA (0.04 M Tris–acetate, 0.001 M EDTA) buffer at 75 mAmp for
TM
1
.5 h. The gel was stained and desired fragment was excised, purified (Gen Elute
Gel Extraction Kit of Sigma) and cloned into pGEM-T Easy cloning vector according
to manufacturer instructions.
2.4. Purification
Transformed E. coli DH5␣ cells carrying the recombinant plasmid were selected
method using a BigDye terminator cycle sequencing kit v3.1 (Applied Biosys-
tems, Foster City, USA) in an ABI Prism 3130 xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied
Biosystems) by following the manufacturer’s instructions. Editing was done
to remove the vector sequence and sequence was characterized with tan-
nase gene sequences already available in GenBank using the BLAST programme
(www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/blast.cgi).
Purification was done by the methodology used by Zeida et al. [16]. The cells
were grown overnight in nutrient broth medium of pH 7. 10% (v/v) overnight cul-
ture was used to inoculate a litre of defined medium of pH 6.0. (15 g tannic acid,
5
g sucrose, 2 g (NH4)2HPO4, 1 g KH2PO4, 0.5 g MgSO4, and 0.5 g yeast extract). The
◦
inoculated medium was incubated at 35 C for 24 h with constant shaking (200 rpm).
Cells were harvested by centrifugation (Sigma 2 16-PK) at 5000 × g for 10 min at
room temperature. The pellet obtained was washed twice with 50 mM citrate buffer
of pH 5.0 (containing 1 mM DTT and 50 mM Na2S2O3) and suspended in minimum
amount of the same buffer. The resting cells suspension was quantified for tannase
enzyme activity and lysed by ultrasonication for 2 min in an ultrasonicator (Sonics
2
.9. Characterization of tannase sequence
◦
Material Inc., USA) at 4 C by giving pulse of 9 s on and 5 s off. The lysate was cen-
Tannase nucleotides and amino acids sequence of Enterobacter sp. was deposited
◦
trifuged at 4 C for 15 min at 13,000 × g. The supernatant obtained was quantified
in the GenBank database of NCBI. The deduced amino acid sequence was character-
ized in terms of percentage homology with the available tannase sequences through
ClustalW2 (www.ebi.ac.uk).
for tannase activity. The protein concentration was also determined by Bradford
method [17].
The lysate was further used as a source of crude enzyme for purification. The
crude enzyme was fractionated with ammonium sulphate in increasing concen-
tration. Three fractions of ammonium sulphate precipitation (0–30%, 30%, 60% and
3. Results and discussions
◦
6
0–100%) were obtained at 4 C with constant gentle shaking. Each precipitated
samples were suspended in 1 ml of 50 mM citrate buffer of pH 5.0 and dialyzed
overnight against the buffer (50 mM citrate buffer of pH 5.0) containing 1 mM DTT
and 50 mM Na2S2O3 at 4 C in dialysis tubing. The activity and protein content were
3
.1. Purification and characterization
◦
In the present investigation the enzyme tannase was purified
determined as described above in all dialyzed samples.
Proteins precipitated at 30–60% concentration of ammonium sulphate subjected
to dialysis and were loaded onto a pre equilibrated DEAE cellulose column (bed
volume 20 ml) (Hi Prep 16/10 DEAE FF column). 50 mM citrate buffer of pH 5.0
from its native conditions. Osawa et al. [11] and Mondal and Pati
[12] isolated bacterial species for tannase production but none of
them characterized tannase at molecular level. Tannase was finally
purified with a yield of 7.1% by using DEAE cellulose followed by
Sephadex G-100 column. Bhardwaj et al. [8], Mahendran et al. [9]
and Iwamoto et al. [14] also purified tannase from various sources
and obtained the yield of process as 20%, 17% and 4.8%, respectively.
In addition to it, the tannase of Enterobacter sp. was eluted as a
single peak through DEAE cellulose and Sephadex G-100 column
in the present investigation which is different from the observa-
tions made by Bhardwaj et al. [8] during the purification of tannase
TM
containing 1 mM DTT and 50 mM Na2S2O3 was used as pre equilibration buffer.
Elution was done with increasing concentration of NaCl (0–0.5 M) in 50 mM citrate
buffer of pH 5.0 containing 1 mM DTT and 50 mM Na2S2O3 at room temperature with
a flow rate of 5 ml/min. The eluted fractions were checked for tannase activity and
active fractions were pooled. Pooled samples were concentrated by freeze-drying
method and loaded onto G-100 Sephadex column (bed volume 60 ml). The protein
was finally eluted with 50 mM citrate buffer of pH 5.0 containing 1 mM DTT, 50 mM
Na2S2O3 and 50 mM NaCl at a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min. The activity, protein content
and purity were determined and the purified enzyme was characterized in terms of
pH optima, temperature optima and Km.