Full Paper
ducted. Oxidation of P4 with mCPBA gave pentavalent phos-
phorus compound P4-O in good yield (Scheme 1), whereas
similar treatment of P1–P3 resulted in complex mixtures with
the corresponding phosphane oxides not being formed. The
Baumgartner group demonstrated that complexation of a bi-
thiophene-fused diketophosphanyl compound with AuI drasti-
cally stabilizes the LUMO orbital energy, and thereby the elec-
tron-accepting ability was enhanced.[4a] Upon mixing P1 with
an equimolar amount of Au(tht)Cl [tht=tetrahydrothiophene]
in CH2Cl2 at room temperature, yellow solids started to precipi-
tate. The collected solids were washed with Et2O and dried in
vacuo to give P1-AuCl in 52% yield [Eq. (1)]. The complexation
1
resulted in significant downfield-shift of the H NMR resonan-
ces corresponding to the CH3 (on the 2,6-positions of Mes,
Dd= +0.30 ppm) and Ar-H (on the 3,5-positions of Mes, Dd=
+0.11 ppm), indicating a marked decrease in electron density
on the P center. Reference compounds N1–N4 (Scheme 2)
were readily prepared by classical condensation of the corre-
sponding aromatic carboxylic anhydrides with MesNH2 (for de-
tails, see the Supporting Information).
Figure 1. a) Molecular structure of P4 in the solid state. Thermal ellipsoids
are set at the 50% probability level, and hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity. Selected bond lengths (ꢁ) and angles (degree): P1ꢀC1, 1.820(2); P1ꢀ
C10, 1.835(4); P1ꢀC20, 1.839(3); C10ꢀC11, 1.487(3); C19ꢀC20, 1.487(4); O1ꢀ
C10, 1.228(4); O2ꢀC20, 1.221(4); C11ꢀC12, 1.389(5); C12ꢀC13; 1.395(5); C13ꢀ
C14, 1.374(5); C14ꢀC15, 1.413(5); C15ꢀC21, 1.429(3); C15ꢀC16, 1.415(5);
C16ꢀC17, 1.368(6); C17ꢀC18, 1.404(5); C18ꢀC19, 1.385(4); C19ꢀC21,
1.427(5); C10-P1-C20, 99.8(1); C1-P1-C10, 107.0(1); C1-P1-C20, 105.5(1); C19-
C20-P1, 117.1(2); C11-C10-P1, 117.4(2); C10-C11-C21, 122.8(3); C20-C19-C21,
123.2(3); C11-C21-C19, 124.7(3). b) A dimeric structure of P4 found in the
packing structure.
Crystal structure of P4
A yellow single crystal of P4 that was suitable for X-ray diffrac-
tion analysis was obtained by recrystallization from its CH2Cl2/
hexane biphasic solution. Although the molecular structures of
five-,[6,9] seven-,[4a] and twelve-membered diketophosphanyl
compounds[3e] clarified by X-ray crystallographic analysis, have
been reported so far, to our knowledge, this is the first report
on the structural analysis of a six-membered cyclic diketophos-
phanyl compound (Figure 1a).[10] The phosphorus center (P1 in
Figure 1a) adopts a pyramidal structure as expected, with the
deviation from the mean plane of the naphthalene unit being
approximately 0.71 ꢁ and the interplane angle between C10-
P1-C20 and C10-C11-C21-C19-C20 (mean plane) being approxi-
mately 398. In comparison with reported five-[6,9] and seven-
membered[4a] diketophosphanyl compounds, the deviations of
the PIII-center from the mean plane of dicarbonyl-fused aro-
matic ring and the interplane angles (calculated in a similar
way to that for P4) were found to decrease in the order of ring
size as follows: seven- (ca. 0.79 ꢁ, ca. 488)[4a] > six- (ca. 0.71 ꢁ,
ca. 398, P4)> five-membered compound (ca. 0.38 ꢁ, ca. 178).[9]
In conjunction with the fact that bond lengths of the exocyclic
PꢀC bond (P1ꢀC1 in Figure 1a, ca. 1.82 ꢁ) and two endocyclic
PꢀC bonds (P1ꢀC10 and P1ꢀC20 in Figure 1a, ca. 1.84 ꢁ for
both) have almost the same values as those previously repor-
ted,[4a,6,9] the order of P deviations and interplane angles men-
tioned above would be derived from the variation in ring
strain rather than from the degree of p conjugation. Further-
more, a unique intermolecular dimeric motif that is comprised
of the adjacent two molecules was found in the packing struc-
ture, with the two naphthalene planes being stacked face-to-
face (Figure 1b).
Photophysical properties
Physicochemical properties of diketophosphanyl compounds
P1–P4, P1-AuCl, and P4-O, as well as those of reference imide
compounds N1–N4 for comparison, are summarized in Table 1.
UV/Vis absorption and photoluminescence (PL) spectra of di-
luted CH2Cl2 solutions (10ꢀ5 m order) of all compounds are illus-
trated in Figure 2. Compared with the simplest imide N1, the
absorption spectrum of its P analogue P1 exhibited a redshift
throughout the entire region, featuring a strong absorption at
labs =239 nm (e 4.32ꢂ104 mꢀ1 cmꢀ1), which is assignable to the
HOMO-6!LUMO+1 transition by TD-DFT calculation [B3LYP/
6-31G(d)//B3LYP/6-31G(d) level of theory (for details, see the
Supporting Information)], a shouldered absorption at around
labs =253 nm (e 2.25ꢂ104 mꢀ1 cmꢀ1, HOMO!LUMO+2 transi-
tion), and a weak absorption at labs =296 nm (e 0.49ꢂ
104 mꢀ1 cmꢀ1, HOMO-3!LUMO transition) (Figure 2a). In addi-
tion, a very weak and broadened absorption was observed in
the lower energy region (350–420 nm) (see the enlarged spec-
trum in the Supporting Information), which can be ascribed by
Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 1 – 8
3
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
&
&
These are not the final page numbers! ÞÞ