7882
A. Krief et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 7881–7882
Scheme 3. Proposed alternative route to 1(R)-trans-chrysanthemic acid using isopropylidene triphenyl phosphorane. (i) AD-mix
a; (ii) (a) Cl2CꢀO; (b) acetone, H+; (iii) Me2CꢀPPh3; (iv) H3O+; (v) (CH2NMe)2PPh.
Removal of the thiocarbonate moiety has been
achieved under mild conditions using trisaminophos-
phine (3 equiv., neat, 40°C, 6 h)6a to produce methy1
1(R)-trans-chrysanthemate 1 (89% yield, e.e. 95%, com-
pared to an authentic sample).5a,7
quite lengthy route (seven instead of four steps) which
will produce 1 with poor enantioselection (e.e. <56%=
75×75) and will offer no advantages over the route
reported in Scheme 1. We have not pursued our work
towards these lines.
The synthesis reported here could appear as trivial since
each of the individual steps was previously known. We
will now show that successful synthesis of 1 requires
adequate synthetic planning and proper choice of
reagents.
References
1. (a) Krief, A. Synthesis of optically active pyrethroids—
strategy and practice: synthesis of non-racemic cyclo-
propane carboxylic acids. In Stereocontrolled Organic
Synthesis. A Chemistry for the 21st Century Monograph;
International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry,
Trost, B. M., Ed.; Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1994,
pp. 337–397; (b) Krief, A. Pestic. Sci. 1994, 41, 237.
2. (a) Chiusoli, G. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1967, 6, 124; (b)
Devos, M.-J.; Hevesi, L.; Bayet, P.; Krief, A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1976, 3911.
3. Corey, E. J.; Jautelat, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89,
3912.
4. Kolb, H. C.; Vannieuwenhze, M. S.; Sharpless, K. B.
Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 2483.
5. (a) Krief, A.; Dumont, W.; Pasau, P.; Lecomte, Ph. Tetra-
hedron 1989, 45, 3039; (b) Krief, A.; Lecomte, P.;
Demoute, J. P.; Dumont, W. Synthesis 1990, 275; (c)
Krief, A.; Surleraux, D.; Dumont, W.; Pasau, P.; Lecomte,
Ph. Pure Appl. Chem. 1990, 62, 1311; (d) Krief, A.;
Lecomte, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 2695.
6. (a) Corey, E. J.; Hopkins, P. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23,
1979; (b) Provins, L. Dissertation doctorale, 1998,
FUNDP, Namur.
What would have happened if we had made a different
choice? Let us look at a different scenario which would
have taken place if isopropylidene triphenyl phospho-
rane would have been used in place of its sulfur
analogue.1,5
AD-mix a is now required since phosphoranes and
sulfuranes are known to react by the opposite face with
g-alkoxy-E-a,b-unsaturated esters.1,5 Stereocontrol is
much poorer at both the dihydroxylation stage4 (e.e.
76% instead of 94% with AD-mix b) and at the cyclo-
propanation reaction5,8 (d.e. 75% instead of 98% with
AD-mix b, compare Scheme 3 to Scheme 1). Moreover
isopropylidene triphenyl phosphorane leads, on reac-
tion with the unsaturated the thionocarbonate 5% (1.2
equiv., THF, 0°C to 20°C), to an intractable mixture of
compounds in which the cyclopropyl ester 6% is missing.
The synthesis of methyl 1(R)-trans-chrysanthemate 1
could have been nevertheless achieved from the diol 4s
using the dioxolane protecting group as already
described for a related case1,5,7 (5s, Scheme 3). This is a
7. [h]D +20 (20°C, c 0.985, CHCl3).
8. Mulzer, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1983, 22, 63.