L.Y.K. Suh, et al.
FreeRadicalBiologyandMedicine143(2019)422–432
20 and 60 min to identify the wavelength(s) subject to change. All re-
actions were carried out in PB. UV–Vis spectra were acquired as de-
scribed above.
d6; Cambridge Isotopes Laboratories, Tewksbury, MA) for 1H-NMR
spectra acquisition using a Bruker FT-600 MHz NMR spectrometer. 1H-
NMR and 13C-NMR spectra were determined using tetramethylsilane as
a reference. Chemical shifts (δ) and coupling constants (J) are expressed
in parts per million and Hertz, respectively.
2.5. Liquid-chromatography mass-spectroscopy (LC-MS) analysis of
edaravone metabolites
2.8. Metabolic activity (ATP) assay of the HL-60 cells
Edaravone (500 μM) was mixed with 500 nM MPO and
100 μM H2O2 in a 200 μL reaction mixture using PB. The reaction was
carried out for 1 h on a shaker and then stopped by addition of 200 μL
ice-cold acetonitrile. Reaction components were separated by adding
ice-cold acetonitrile to the mixture, followed by vigorous mixing on a
vortex for 5 min and then centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C.
The organic phase was collected and analyzed by high-resolution LC-
MS. RP-HPLC-UV-MS was performed using an Agilent 1200 SL HPLC
System with a Phenomenex Kinetex 1.7 μm, 100 Å, 50 × 2.1 mm, C8
reverse-phase analytical column with guard (Phenomenex, Torrance,
CA, USA), thermostated at 40 °C followed by UV and mass spectro-
metric detection. An aliquot was loaded onto the column and flushed
for 1 min to remove salts at a flow rate of 0.50 mL/min and an initial
buffer composition of 99% of 0.1% formic acid as mobile phase A and
1% of 0.1% acetonitrile as mobile phase B. Elution of the analytes was
achieved by using a linear gradient from 1% to 99% mobile phase B
over a period of 9 min, held at 99% mobile phase B for 1 min to remove
all analytes from the column and 99%–1% mobile phase B over a period
of 1 min. Mass spectra were acquired in positive mode ionization using
an Agilent 6220 Accurate-Mass TOF HPLC/MS system (Santa Clara, CA,
USA) equipped with a dual sprayer electrospray ionization source with
the second sprayer providing a reference mass solution. Mass spectro-
metric conditions were drying gas 9 L/min at 325 °C, nebulizer 25 psi,
mass range 100–1000 Da, acquisition rate of ~1.03 spectra/sec, frag-
mentor 150 V, skimmer 65 V, capillary 3800 V, instrument state 4 GHz
High Resolution. Mass correction was performed for every individual
spectrum using peaks at m/z 121.05087 and 922.00979 from the re-
ference solution. Data acquisition was performed using the Mass Hunter
software package (ver. B.04.00). Analysis of the HPLC-UV-MS data was
done using the Agilent Mass Hunter Qualitative Analysis software (ver.
B.07.00).
HL-60 human promyelocytic cells were seeded in a 96-well micro-
plate at 1 × 105 cells/mL in 100 μL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
Cells were treated with increasing concentration of edaravone (0, 1, 5,
10, 25, 50, 100 and 200 μM), then co-stimulated with either a bolus
concentration of 30 μM H2O2 or 5 mM glucose and 10 mU/mL GOx to
induce toxicity. Cells receiving no treatment and 0.04% DMSO treat-
ment were included as a negative control (NC) and vehicle control,
respectively. Following 3 h incubation, CellTiter-Glo® Luminescent Cell
Viability Assay was performed following the manufacturer's instruction.
Luminescence values were presented as a percentage of the vehicle
control and expressed as mean
SD. All treatments were carried out
in triplicates, and the assay was repeated three independent times.
Statistical analysis was carried out by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni
multiple comparisons (n = 3) using GraphPad Prism 6 software.
2.9. Cytotoxicity (LDH) assay of the HL-60 cells
HL-60 cells were treated with edaravone and H2O2 as described
above. The LDH activity assay was carried out according to the man-
ufacturer's instruction. Briefly, 10 μL of lysis buffer was added to the
untreated cells for the last 30 min of incubation to establish 100% cy-
totoxicity (positive control, PC). Similarly, cells in other wells were
treated with PBS (negative control, NC), and vehicle control (DMSO).
The dye mixture in assay buffer (100 μL) was added to each well and
incubated in the dark for 30 min. Stop solution (50 μL) was added, and
the absorbance was recorded at 490 nm. The percent cytotoxicity was
calculated using the following formula:
[Cytotoxicity (%) = (ATest substance-APC) / (APC-ANC)]
The percent cytotoxicity was expressed as mean
SD. Statistical
analysis was carried out by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple
comparisons (n = 3) using GraphPad Prism 6 software.
Data were normalized as the percentage of negative control and
positive control for CellTiter-Glo and LDH assay, respectively.
2.6. Electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy spin-trapping of edaravone
and glutathionyl radical
Free radical metabolites of edaravone were detected by ESR spin
trapping, where short-lived radical species form covalent adducts with
the nitrone spin trap agent DMPO to produce a relatively stable para-
magnetic species. The reaction mixture consisted of 6.4 mM edaravone,
100 mM DMPO, and 0.5 μM MPO, all prepared in PB. The reaction was
initiated by a sustained generation of H2O2, produced from the reaction
between 5 mM glucose and 25 mU/mL GOx. After briefly vortexing, the
reaction mixture was transferred into three separate 50 μL micro-ca-
pillary tubes, inserted simultaneously into a 3 mm ESR tube which was
then placed in the resonator. ESR spectra were obtained with a Bruker
Elexsys E−500 spectrometer (Billerica, MA) with the following para-
meters: Center field = 3505 G, sweep width = 100 G, Field
modulation = 1 G, Microwave frequency = 9.8 GHz, Microwave
power = 20 mW, and sweep time = 120 s. Spectra were recorded after
two scans. Oxidation of glutathione by edaravone radical into glu-
tathionyl radical was also assessed by ESR spin trapping with DMPO.
Reaction mixtures consisted of 100 mM DMPO, 1 mM GSH, and 50 nM
MPO in PB were mixed with either 10 μM phenol, 10 μM edaravone or
DMSO (0.02%). After triggering with 100 μM H2O2, ESR spectroscopic
analyses were carried out as described above.
2.10. Western blot analysis of MPO amount in HL-60 cells
HL-60 total cell protein lysates were prepared using RIPA buffer
(1% Triton X-100, 0.5% Sodium deoxycholate, and 0.1% SDS in PBS pH
7.4) containing protease inhibitor cocktail (10 μL per 107 cells), fol-
lowed by three freeze-thaw cycles. Mixtures were centrifuged at
15,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was collected.
Human purified MPO (0.3, 1, 3 and 9 μg) and the HL-60 total cell
protein lysate (containing 0.1, 0.3 and 0.9 × 106 cells) were recon-
stituted in 4X Laemmli buffer and subjected onto the same gel for
electrophoretic separation, followed by semi-dry transfer onto ni-
trocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked with blocking buffer
consisting of 5% non-fat skim milk in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1%
Tween-20 (TBST) for 1 h at room temperature and incubated overnight
at 4 °C with primary anti-MPO Rabbit pAb (1:4000) in blocking buffer.
The secondary goat anti-rabbit IgG, HRP-linked antibody (1:5000) was
incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Membranes were washed three
times with TBST after each step of immunoblotting. Immunoblots were
visualized with Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate
using ImageQuant LAS 4000mini Luminescent image analyzer (GE
Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA). Band intensities were quantified using
2.7. NMR studies for exchangeable proton analysis in edaravone
Edaravone (30 mg) was dissolved in 2 mL deuterated DMSO (DMSO-
ImageJ software (NIH, United States) and expressed as mean
SD
424