COPh) anion is formed in the first step. This ion could then
lead to dihydrofullerenes 5-9 if a strong acid is added to
the reaction medium as we have recently shown.16 But, of
course, such an acid cannot be available in this medium,
and dihydrofullerenes thus cannot be formed.
Scheme 5a
Another possibility might be considered if C60H- anion
is first formed; in this case, a further reaction with XCH2A
(X ) Br, I) should provide dihydrofullerenes. However, this
ion is unlikely to come from an acid-base reaction between
C602- and XCH2A since the basic character of C602- has been
estimated to be weaker than that of benzoate anion.17 We
put forward a new hypothesis. In the first stage the single-
a Conditions: (i) excess DIBAL-H (20 equiv), toluene, 2 h, -80
°C, then acidic (aqueous 1 M HCl/MeOH) hydrolysis.
2-
electron transfer between C60 and BrCH2A could occur
according two competitive pathways (Scheme 4), a major
leads to the corresponding 1,4-adduct C60(p-CH2-C6H4-
CH2OH)2 12 (ca. 15% yield) (Scheme 6).
Scheme 4
Scheme 6
•
-• 14
one leading as expected to CH2A and C60
, and a minor
one leading to H• and C60-• due to the strong polarity of the
C-H bonds in XCH2A (stronger than that in simple
haloalkanes R-CH2X for instance).18 Then, of course, the
overall process will continue through coupling of the radical
moieties, followed by the reaction with a second molecule
of XCH2A (Scheme 4).
In conclusion, new functional organo derivatives of C60
were synthesized and characterized.19 C602- anion chemistry
is thus emphasized, since the obtained compounds appear
(19) Selected Spectroscopic Data. Compound 3a: 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 4.68 (s, 4H), 4.47 (q, 4H, J ) 7.1 Hz), 1.45 (t, 6H, J ) 7.1 Hz);
13C NMR (125.75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 172.3, 156.2, 147.9, 146.6, 146.3, 146.0,
145.5, 145.4, 144.8, 143.3, 142.6, 142.2, 141.8, 141.4, 139.8, 136.2, 62.7,
61.8, 46.2, 14.3; ES-MS calcd for C68H14O4 894.089, found M-• 894.086.
UV-vis (hexane), λmax [nm] 431, 307-308, 254, 214. Compound 4: 1H
NMR (500 MHz, CS2/C6D6) δ 4.57 (s, 1H), 4.35 (q, 2H, J ) 7.1 Hz), 1.40
(t, 3H, J ) 7.1 Hz); 13C NMR (125.75 MHz, CS2/C6D6) δ 164.8, 148.5,
145.9, 145.7, 145.4, 145.4, 145.3, 145.3, 145.0, 144.9, 144.9, 144.8, 144.6,
144.2, 143.9, 143.6, 143.3, 143.3, 143.2, 143.0, 142.7, 142.5, 142.3, 142.2,
141.4, 141.2, 141.0, 136.6, 71.0, 62.3, 39.6, 15.0; MALDI-TOF MS calcd
for C64H6O2 806.0, found M+• 806.0; UV-vis (hexane), λmax [nm] 425,
256, 214. Compound 7: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CS2/CDCl3) δ 8.19 (d, 4H),
7.65 (t, 2H), 7.53 (t, 4H), 4.75 (d, 2H, J ) 15.8 Hz), 4.72 (d, 2H, J ) 15.8
Hz); 13C NMR (125.75 MHz, CS2/CDCl3) δ 194.9, 155.9, 150.9, 148.3,
147.8, 146.9, 146.7, 146.7, 146.6, 145.2, 145.2, 144.9, 144.9, 144.5, 144.4,
144.2, 144.0, 144.0, 143.7, 143.6, 143.4, 142.9, 142.9, 142.8, 142.4, 142.0,
141.8, 141.6, 140.5, 138.6, 138.5, 136.6, 133.2, 128.6, 128.4, 55.1, 49.3;
MALDI-TOF MS calcd for C76H14O2 958.1, found M-• 958.1; UV-vis
(o-dichlorobenzene) λmax [ nm] 443 (broad). Compound 8: 1H NMR (500
MHz, CS2/CDCl3) δ 8.44 (dd, 2H, J ) 7.2 Hz, J′ ) 1.5 Hz), 7.76-7.73
(m, 1H), 7.70-7.65 (m, 2H), 5.61 (s, 1H); MALDI-TOF MS calcd for
C68H6O 838.0, found M-• 838.0. Compound 9: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CS2/
CDCl3) δ 8.36 (dd, 2H, J ) 7.2 Hz, J′ ) 1.5 Hz), 7.76-7.73 (m, 1H),
7.70-7.65 (m, 2H), 6.72 (s, 1H), 5.20 (s, 2H); MALDI-TOF MS calcd for
C68H8O 840.0, found M-• 840.0. Compound 10: 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CS2/C6D6) δ 10.27 (t, 2H, J ) 1.8 Hz), 3.98 (dt, 2H, J ) 1.8 Hz, J′ ) 16
Hz), 3.93 (dt, 2H, J ) 1.8 Hz, J′ ) 16 Hz); 13C NMR (125.75 MHz, CS2/
C6D6) δ 195.8, 155.4, 150.4, 148.9, 148.2, 147.6, 147.2, 146.9, 145.8, 145.6,
145.0, 145.0, 144.8, 144.6, 144.6, 144.5, 144.4, 144.2, 143.8, 143.6, 143.4,
142.9, 142.5, 142.3, 139.1, 138.9, 54.3, 54.0; ES-MS calcd for C64H6O2
806.037, found M-• 806.036. UV-vis (o-dichlorobenzene), λmax [ nm] 442
(broad). Compound 12: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CS2/acetone-d6), δ 7.56 (d,
4H, J ) 7.9 Hz), 7.43 (d, 4H, J ) 7.9 Hz), 4.61 (d, 4H, J ) 5.6 hz), 3.92
(m, 4H, J ) 13.7 Hz), 3.90 (t, 2H, J ) 5.6 Hz); 13C NMR (125.75 MHz,
CS2/C6D6) δ 158.7, 152.6, 149.4, 149.2, 147.8, 147.8, 147.6, 147.5, 146.9,
146.1, 145.7, 145.5, 145.5, 145.4, 145.0, 144.9, 144.9, 144.7, 144.5, 144.4,
143.8, 143.7, 143.6, 143.3, 143.2, 143.1, 142.7, 142.6, 142.4, 141.1, 139.5,
138.6, 135.1, 131.5, 127.2, 64.4, 61.4, 48.9; MALDI-TOF MS calcd for
C76H18O2 962.0, found M-• 962.0; UV-vis (dichloromethane), λmax [nm]
444 (broad), 327, 270.
Most of these new C60 derivative compounds possess great
synthetic potential due to the presence of ketone and ester
groups. Thus, the diester 3b was easily reduced into the
corresponding dialdehyde 10 (ca. 50% yield) upon reaction
with DIBAL-H in toluene at low temperatures (-80 °C).
This compound was isolated and characterized by NMR and
mass spectrometry analyses. Unfortunately, further reactions
of DIBAL-H, at different temperatures, versus dialdehyde
10 did not allow the isolation of the corresponding diol
C60(CH2CH2OH)2, which could not be obtained from reduc-
tion of diester 3b either.
Nevertheless, to obtain organo derivatives of C60 bearing
2-
two alcohol groups, we studied the reaction between C60
and p-BrCH2-C6H4-CH2OH 11, this alcohol being easily
obtained from reduction of the commercially available methyl
ester p-BrCH2-C6H4-CO2Me. As expected, the reaction
(15) (a) Subramanian, R.; Kadish, K. M.; Vijayashree, M. N.; Gao, X.;
Jones, M. T.; Miller, M. D.; Krause, K. L.; Suenobu, T.; Fukuzumi, S. J.
Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 16327-16335. (b) Fukuzumi, S.; Suenobu, T.;
Hirasaka, T.; Arakawa, R.; Kadish, K. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
9220-9227.
(16) Allard, E., Cheng, F.; Chopin, S.; Delaunay, J.; Rondeau, D.;
Cousseau, New. J. Chem. 2003, 27, 188-192.
(17) Cliffel, D. E.; Bard, A. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 8140-8143.
(18) This hypothesis may be related to the redox reactions of sodium or
potassium with alcohols, the initial step being considered as a single-electron
transfer from the alkali metal to the hydrogen atom of an OH group. This
reaction appears to be strongly dependent on the polarity of the O-H bond,
since the generation of hydrogen is very easy and even violent from primary
alcohols but very sluggish from tertiary alcohols.
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 13, 2003
2241