Communication
Dalton Transactions
In order to gain further insight into the phase transition such as polarity are retained even though the phase transition
details of 1, we modified the hydrogen donor by introducing a behaviour is tuned.
methylamino group, and obtained its isomorphic compound
In conclusion, a structural phase transition induced by
−
2
, supposing that motion of the terminal NCS groups may be ligand motion has been demonstrated in a 3D hydrogen-
suppressed by the methyl group, and thus, result in distinct bonded polar supramolecular network consisting of one-
phase transition behaviour. Indeed, for 2, the single-crystal dimensional Cu(II) chains. Moreover, restraining the motional
diffractions at 103 and 353 K revealed that it crystallizes in the groups via steric hindrance resulted in distinct phase tran-
space group Cmc2 , the same as that of 1α. Similar to 1α, at sition behaviour in its isomorphic compound. This fact
1
3
53 K, polar [Cu(NCS)
2
]
n
chains with alternate weak- demonstrates that a slight modulation of the specific confined
coordinated Cu⋯S interactions [3.884(2) Å] and Cu–S co- environment around the motional units is a moderate way to
ordinated bonds [2.774(2) Å] are found in 2 (Fig. S10†). The control the motion of ligands and to tune the structural phase
interchain hydrogen-bond interactions and the resulting 3D transition yet keep the crystal packing unchanged. The present
supramolecular network of 2 are almost the same as those of strategy provides a new clue for the design and synthesis of
−
1
α, except that the terminal NCS groups in 2 are found to be new phase transition materials or tuning phase transition
orderly located on the mirror plane at 353 K. As shown in behaviours for known materials.
−
Fig. 2b, each terminal NCS group is attracted by two N–H
groups via hydrogen-bonding interactions, and is repulsed by
two methyl groups from the opposite side via steric exclusion.
−
As a result, the motion of each terminal NCS group is
Acknowledgements
restrained along the a and c directions, thus the structure of 2
was found to be almost unchanged when the temperature was This work was supported by the NSFC (21290173, 21121061
lowered to 103 K. The absence of a phase transition in the and 21301198), the 973 Project (2012CB821706), and NSF of
temperature region of 200–373 K was further confirmed by Guangdong (S2012030006240). W.-X. Z. is grateful for “100
DSC measurements for 2 (Fig. S11†). Though a phase tran- Talents Program of SYSU” initial funding.
sition of 2 might occur at a lower temperature, which was not
detected in our investigated temperature range (T > 103 K), the
phase transition temperature of 2 must be at least 237 K lower
than that of 1. This fact clearly indicates that the microscopic
Notes and references
origin for the phase transition of 1 is the dynamic motion of
the NCS− ligands, and more significantly, restraining such
ligand motion can give rise to distinct phase transition
behaviour.
1 I. E. Collings, A. B. Cairns, A. L. Thompson, J. E. Parker,
C. C. Tang, M. G. Tucker, J. Catafesta, C. Levelut, J. Haines,
V. Dmitriev, P. Pattison and A. L. Goodwin, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2013, 135, 7610.
2 (a) C. S. Vogelsberg and M. A. Garcia-Garibay, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 2012, 41, 1892; (b) A. Coskun, M. Banaszak,
R. D. Astumian, J. F. Stoddart and B. A. Grzybowski, Chem.
Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 19.
3 (a) W. Zhang, H. Y. Ye, R. Graf, H. W. Spiess, Y. F. Yao,
R. Q. Zhu and R. G. Xiong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135,
5230; (b) Y. Yoshii, N. Hoshino, T. Nakamura and
T. Akutagawa, CrystEngComm, 2012, 14, 7458.
4 T. Akutagawa, H. Koshinaka, D. Sato, S. Takeda, S. I. Noro,
H. Takahashi, R. Kumai, Y. Tokura and T. Nakamura, Nat.
Mater., 2009, 8, 342.
5 S. Horiuchi and Y. Tokura, Nat. Mater., 2008, 7, 357.
6 (a) R. Samantaray, R. J. Clark, E. S. Choi, H. Zhou and
N. S. Dalal, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 3792;
(b) Z. H. Sun, J. H. Luo, T. L. Chen, L. N. Li, R. G. Xiong,
M. L. Tong and M. C. Hong, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2012, 22,
4855; (c) K. Takahashi, N. Hoshino, K. Kubo, T. Nakamura
and T. Akutagawa, CrystEngComm, 2012, 14, 5235.
7 (a) C. Wang, D. M. Liu and W. B. Lin, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2013, 135, 13222; (b) K. Raatikainen and K. Rissanen,
Chem. Sci., 2012, 3, 1235; (c) Q. Chen, Z. Chang,
W. C. Song, H. Song, H. B. Song, T. L. Hu and X. H. Bu,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 11550.
In order to manifest the molecular motion, the general
approach focused on the modification of the size and/or geo-
metry of the motional units. For instance, in a series of arylam-
1
2
monium-crown
ether
supramolecular
assemblies,
modulation of the motional cation conformation resulted in
different phase transition behaviours. In CPs, similar cation-
dependent phase transition behaviours were found in the per-
1
3
ovskite-type compounds [(CH
3
)
n
NH(4−n)][Mn(N
3
)
3
] (n = 1–4)
+
−
and the [AmineH] [Mn(HCOO) ] (AmineH
= protonated
However, at the same time, the
3
1
4
amines) frameworks.
modulation of the size and/or geometry of the motional
units seem so strong that they usually cause a dramatic
change in the crystal packing, which makes the mechanism
of phase transition more complicated. In contrast, an
alternative and moderate way that slightly modulates the
specific environment around the motional units may keep
1
5
the crystal packing and has been less explored in CPs. In
the present case, we are interested in the microscopic and
specific confined environment around the motional NCS−
groups and modulating them through a steric hindrance
effect. This strategy effectively restrains the motion of the
ligand and results in distinct phase transition behaviours of 1
and 2. Moreover, the modification of the ligands does not
change the molecular packing, hence the bulky properties
9010 | Dalton Trans., 2014, 43, 9008–9011
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014