3
SCF3 reagent) to prepare trifluoromethyl thiolsulphonate as
well.11a Different from the traditional protocol,6 Shen's
methodology avoided the use of gaseous and toxic CF3SCl as a
trifluoromethylthiolating reagent, and employed bench-stable
sodium sulfinate as a reaction partner.
Our method described here served as a supplementary of
Shen's work and our previous result, and relatively simple
reaction operation and easy substrate's accessibility of our
method were impressive.
70% yield. This result is probably attributed to the effect of
steric hindrance in the substrate. To support this conclusion, the
reaction of 2, 4, 6-trimethylbenzenesulfonyl chloride was carried
out under standard conditions. As expected, the reaction yield
was decreased to 50%. Additionally, the substrates with
naphthalene and heterocycles were also tested accordingly. To
our delight, the corresponding products 3o and 3p were achieved
in good yields. The reaction using N-methyl-N-phenyl-S-
(trifluoromethyl)thiohydroxylamine was conducted as well, and
3a was observed in a similar yield.
In conclusion, we have developed an alternative route for the
generation of trifluoromethyl thiolsulphonate from sulfonyl
chloride. The reaction proceeded smoothly under mild reaction
conditions and an array of trifluoromethyl thiolsulphonate was
achieved with high efficiency and excellent functional group
tolerance. A tandem process comprised by in situ generation of
sulfinate and electrophilic trifluoromethylthiolation was involved
in the reaction.
With the above conditions in hand, we then examined the
scope. The results were illustrated in Table 2. A series of
Table 2 Synthesis of trifluoromethyl thiolsulphonate through
electrophilic trifluoromethylthiolation of sodium sulfinate 1
with trifluoromethanesulfanylamide 2a a
Acknowledgments
Financial supports from the Natural Science Foundation of
China (No: 21502069), the Natural Science Foundation of
Zhejiang Province (No: LQ15B020006) and the Ph.D.
Scientific Research Starting Foundation of Jiaxing
University (No: 70515015) and Shanghai Ocean University
(No. A2-0203-00-100338) are gratefully acknowledged.
Generous support of human resources from Prof. Jie Wu
(Fudan University, China) is very gratefully acknowledged.
References and notes
1.
For the selected examples, see: (a) Preshlock, S.; Tredwell, M.;
Gouverneur, V. Chem. Rev., 2016, 116, 719; (b) Buckingham, F.;
Gouverneur, V. Chem. Sci., 2016, 7, 1645; (c) Serguchev, Y.;
Ponomarenko, M.; Ignat'ev N. J. Fluorine, Chem., 2016, 185, 1; (d)
Yerien, D.; Bonesi, S.; Postigo, A. Org. Biomol. Chem., 2016, 14,
8398; (e) Kirsch, P. J. Fluorine Chem., 2015, 177, 29; (f) O'Hagan,
D.; Deng, H. Chem. Rev., 2015, 115, 634; (g) Pace, C.; Gao, J. Acc.
Chem. Res., 2013, 46, 907; (h) Merkel, L.; Budisa, N. Org. Biomol.
Chem., 2012, 10, 7241; (i) Berger, R.; Resnati, G.; Metrangolo, P.;
Weber, E.; Hulliger, J. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 3496;
2.
For the selected reviews, see: (a) Chatalova-Sazepin, C.;
Hemelaere, R.; Paquin, J.-F.; Sammis, G. Synthesis, 2015, 47,
2554; (b) Chen, P.; Liu, G. Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2015, 4295; (c)
Champagne, P.; Desroches, J.; Hamel, J.-D.; Vandamme, M.;
Paquin, J.-F. Chem. Rev., 2015, 115, 9073; (d) Neumann, C.;
Ritter, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 3216; (e) Besset, T.;
Poisson, T.; Pannecoucke, X. Chem.-Eur. J., 2014, 20, 16830; (f)
Hennecke, U. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 4532; (g) Qiu, X.-
L.; Qing, F.-L. Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2011, 3261; (h) Grushin, V. V.
Acc. Chem. Res., 2010, 43, 160; (i) Gao, P.; Song, X.-R.; Liu, X.-
Y.; Liang, Y.-M. Chem.-Eur. J., 2015, 21, 7648; (j) Chu, L.; Qing,
F.-L. Acc. Chem. Res., 2014, 47, 1513; (k) Egami, H.; Sodeoka, M.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 8294; (l) Studer, A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 8950; (m) Wu, X.-F.; Neumann, H.;
Beller, M. Chem.-An Asian J., 2012, 7, 1744; (n) Furuya, T.;
Kamlet, A. S.; Ritter T. Nature, 2011, 473, 470; (o) Ma, J.-A.;
Cahard, D.; Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 6119;
a Isolated yield based on sulfinate 1.
trifluoromethyl thiolsulphonate 3 were constructed as expected.
For example, the substrates with methyl, methoxyl, fluoro, chloro,
bromo, cyano, and trifluoromethyl were compatible for the
reactions,
producing
corresponding
trifluoromethyl
thiolsulphonate 3 in 70-96% yields. The ester group was also
tolerated, and the corresponding thiolsulphonate 3d was obtained
in 81% yield, while that of 4-nitro-connected substrate produced
the desired product 3e in 65% yield. Interestingly, the reaction of
4-toluenesulfonyl chloride afforded the desired sulphonate 3j in
93% yield, while the reaction of 2-toluenesulfonyl chloride was
greatly suppressed, leading to the corresponding product 3k in
3.
For selected examples, see:(a) Barata-Vallejo, S.; Bonesi, S.;
Postigo, A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 7150; (b) Toulgoat, F.;
Alazet, S.; Billard, T. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 2415; (c) Ni, C.;
Hu, M.; Hu, J. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 765; (d) Xu, X.-H.;
Matsuzaki, K.; Shibata, N. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 731; (e) Yang,