Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
when CTB and AD were both present on NanoScript-Sox9, thus
suggesting enhanced chondrogenic differentiation.
modification and ratios, and nuclear localization images. This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.
To further quantify the genetic expression patterns of
chondrogenic genes in NanoScript-Sox9-treated ADMSCs, we
performed qPCR. Analysis showed that NanoScript-Sox9
enhanced expression of all three distinct genes, Sox9, Aggrecan,
and Collagen II, as compared to controls and NanoScript lacking
either the AD or CTB (Figure 3e). Another control experiment,
incubating NanoScript-Sox9 with free CTB, suggested that CTB
has maximal function when attached to the AuNP (Figure S9).
Furthermore, expression levels of housekeeping genes remained
unchanged as compared to the control (Figure S10). Even
though NanoScript-Sox9 was designed to target the Sox9 gene,
which showed the highest expression among the three genes,
Sox9 is sufficient to trigger the chondrogenic pathway, including
the Aggrecan and Collagen II genes.
Taken together, the results from our three experiments (HAT
assay, immunofluorescence, and qPCR) indicate that the
presence of both CTB and AD on NanoScript initiates maximal
HAT activity and expression of chondrogenic genes. One
possible hypothesis for this is that the CTB and AD initiate HAT
activity through different pathways: previous reports showed that
CTB initiates HAT activity through the p300 pathway,6 while the
AD (specifically the transactivation peptide) initiates HAT
activity by recruiting factors such as SAGA and NuA4.23,25
Hence, it is possible that because two gene activation pathways
were induced, we observed an enhanced synergistic gene
expression when both CTB and AD were present on NanoScript.
However, the exact interplay between these signaling pathways is
unknown, and we will attempt to elucidate the mechanisms in
future studies.
In summary, the recently developed NanoScript platform was
modified with an epigenetic modification molecule, CTB, which
regulates histone proteins and enhances gene expression through
the HAT-dependent p300 pathway. Addition of CTB not only
moved NanoScript a step closer toward mimicking natural
transcription factors but also enhanced the gene expression
capabilities of NanoScript. The role and function of CTB on
NanoScript were evaluated and revealed that CTB is effective in
inducing HAT activity. Moreover, we observed that NanoScript
with both AD and CTB showed the greatest HAT activity,
possibly because the AD and CTB triggered two distinct
pathways for regulating HAT activity. When NanoScript-Sox9
was incubated with ADMSCs, we confirmed through fluo-
rescence imaging and qPCR that NanoScript-Sox9 activates
expression of chondrogenic markers.
Our NanoScript-based transcriptional activator can have a
significant impact in the fields of stem cell biology and cellular
reprogramming. Through this proof-of-concept demonstration,
we have established that NanoScript is an effective and tunable
platform that can manipulate targeted genes that are critical for
stem cell differentiation in a nonviral manner. Moreover, by
modifying NanoScript with epigenetic modification molecules
such as HAT activators (e.g., CTB), we optimized it to be more
effective in regulating gene expression. As a result, we are
confident that NanoScript can be utilized for other applications
requiring nonviral and effective gene regulation in stem cell
biology and cellular reprogramming.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
Corresponding Authors
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
We thank Anthony Dudzinski, Ruth Goldman, and Mike Moeller
(American CryoStem Corp.) for stem cells and media. K.-B.L.
acknowledges the NIH Director’s Innovator Award
(1DP20D006462-01), NIH R21 (1R21NS085569-01), New
Jersey Commission on Spinal Cord (CSR13ERG005), NSF
CHE-1429062, CBET-1236508, Busch Biomedical Grant
Program, and the Collaborative Research Travel Grant
(CRTG) from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund for funding.
REFERENCES
■
(1) Spivakov, M.; Fisher, A. G. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8, 263.
(2) Portela, A.; Esteller, M. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 1057.
(3) Apostolou, E.; Hochedlinger, K. Nature 2013, 502, 462.
(4) Zaret, K. S.; Carroll, J. S. Gene Dev. 2011, 25, 2227.
(5) Selvi, B. R.; Cassel, J.-C.; Kundu, T. K.; Boutillier, A.-L. BBA-Gene
Regul. Mech. 2010, 1799, 840.
(6) Balasubramanyam, K.; Swaminathan, V.; Ranganathan, A.; Kundu,
T. K. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 19134.
(7) Chan, H. M.; La Thangue, N. B. J. Cell Sci. 2001, 114, 2363.
(8) Mantelingu, K.; Kishore, A. H.; Balasubramanyam, K.; Kumar, G.
V. P.; Altaf, M.; Swamy, S. N.; Selvi, R.; Das, C.; Narayana, C.; Rangappa,
K. S.; Kundu, T. K. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 4527.
(9) Furumatsu, T.; Tsuda, M.; Yoshida, K.; Taniguchi, N.; Ito, T.;
Hashimoto, M.; Ito, T.; Asahara, H. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 35203.
(10) Lefebvre, V.; Huang, W.; Harley, V. R.; Goodfellow, P. N.; de
Crombrugghe, B. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997, 17, 2336.
(11) Patel, S.; Jung, D.; Yin, P. T.; Carlton, P.; Yamamoto, M.; Bando,
T.; Sugiyama, H.; Lee, K.-B. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 8959.
(12) Rodríguez-Martínez, J. A.; Peterson-Kaufman, K. J.; Ansari, A. Z.
BBA-Gene Regul. Mech. 2010, 1799, 768.
(13) Ghosh, A.; Varga, J. J. Cell. Physiol. 2007, 213, 663.
(14) Gottesfeld, J. M.; Neely, L.; Trauger, J. W.; Baird, E. E.; Dervan, P.
B. Nature 1997, 387, 202.
(15) Nyanguile, O.; Uesugi, M.; Austin, D. J.; Verdine, G. L. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94, 13402.
̌
́ ́
Z.; Saleemi, S.; Prior, I. A.; See, V.; Qureshi, R.; Brust, M.
(16) Krpetic,
ACS Nano 2011, 5, 5195.
(17) Rahme, K.; Chen, L.; Hobbs, R. G.; Morris, M. A.; O’Driscoll, C.;
Holmes, J. D. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 6085.
(18) Dykman, L.; Khlebtsov, N. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2256.
(19) Devipriya, B.; Parameswari, A. R.; Rajalakshmi, G.; Palvannan, T.;
Kumardhas, P. Indian J. Biochem. Biol. 2010, 47, 364.
(20) Dervan, P. B.; Edelson, B. S. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2003, 13, 284.
(21) Mertin, S.; McDowall, S. G.; Harley, V. R. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999,
27, 1359.
(22) Morinaga, H.; Bando, T.; Takagaki, T.; Yamamoto, M.; Hashiya,
K.; Sugiyama, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 18924.
(23) Mapp, A. K.; Ansari, A. Z. ACS Chem. Biol. 2007, 2, 62.
(24) (a) Gimble, J. M.; Bunnell, B. A. Circ. Res. 2007, 100, 1249.
(b) Goudenege, S.; Pisani, D. F.; Wdziekonski, B.; Di Santo, J. P.; Bagnis,
C.; Dani, C.; Dechesne, C. A. Mol. Ther. 2009, 17, 1064.
(25) Ikeda, K.; Steger, D. J.; Eberharter, A.; Workman, J. L. Mol. Cell.
Biol. 1999, 19, 855.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
Sox9 polyamide structure and characteristics, absorbance,
NanoScript-Sox9 diameter, cell viability, effect of CTB
■
S
4601
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4598−4601