G. Carrea et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 18 (2007) 1265–1268
1267
Table 2. Aldol condensation of various aldehydes with cyclohexanone in the presence of PLLs
Entry
R
Product Catalyst
Reaction time (h) Yield (%) drc (anti/syn) eec (%) anti
eec (%) syn
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
–Ph
–Ph
–Ph
2
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
L-Leucinea
144
120
168
144
168
168
168
144
168
85
7
4
28
7
34
17
15
13
14:1
8:1
3:1
16:1
23:1
6:1
5:1
7:1
19:1
94 (2S,10R) 22 (2S,10S)
40 (2S,10R) 33 (2R,10R)
56 (2R,10S) 37 (2R,10R)
PLL-Bayerb
PLL-Alfa Aesarb
L-Leucinea
-1-Naphthyl
-1-Naphthyl
–Ph-4-NO2
–Ph-4-NO2
-3-Phenyl-2-propen-2-yl
-3-Phenyl-2-propen-2-yl
P99 (2R,10S)
5
PLL-Bayerb
PLL-Bayerb
PLL-Alfa Aesarb
L-Leucinea
59 (2S,10R) 19
21 (2S,10R) 34
71 (2S,10R) 47
74 (2S,10R) 29
69 (2S,10R) 45
PLL-Bayerb
a Reaction conditions: cyclohexanone (1.5 mmol), aldehyde (0.5 mmol), amino acid catalyst (0.1 mmol) in DMSO/H2O (2.0 mL/0.1 mL).
b PLL catalyst (0.05 mmol) was used.
c Determined by chiral phase HPLC analysis using an AD/OJ Chiralcel column.
a-methyl cinnamaldehyde (Table 2, entry 9) were of the same
order of magnitude as those observed with model substrate
1. In all cases, the prevailing anti-diastereisomer had the
(2S,10R)-absolute configuration. With a-methyl cinnamal-
dehyde, the results with PLL-Bayer were comparable (yield
and enantioselectivity) or even higher (diastereoselectivity)
than those obtained with leucine (Table 2, entries 8 and 9).
PLL-Alfa Aesar gave better results in terms of enantiose-
lectivity with respects to PLL-Bayer with benzaldehyde
(Table 2, entries 2 and 3) and 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (entries
6 and 7, Table 2). Surprisingly, with PLL-Alfa-Aesar the
replacement of a hydrogen atom with a nitro group gave
the opposite stereochemical course, that is, (2R,10S) for 2
(Table 2, entry 3) and (2S,10R) with aldol 4 (Table 2, entry
7). In order to ascertain the possible role of the lengthy
polypeptides in chiral amplification, scalemic polyleucine
was also explored. As shown in Table 3, in contrast with
the amplification effect observed in the asymmetric epoxi-
dation of chalcone with hydrogen peroxide in alkaline
medium,10 the effect of PLL on the aldol condensation of
cyclohexanone with 4-chlorobenzaldehyde was negligible.
This may be due to the higher degree of polymerisation
of the catalyst, which is formed by 64 leucine units on aver-
age. Work is currently in progress which will address this
issue. Interestingly non-linear effects in the acyclic amino
acid catalysed aldol reaction of cyclohexanone with
4-nitrobenzaldehyde in heterogeneous wet DMSO have
recently been reported.17 The prebiotic availability of the
reactants used in our model experiments may be highly
speculative. By the same token, it can be argued that the
DMSO/water medium employed here and by others3a is
not compatible with prebiotic conditions. However, the re-
sults reported herein suggest the existence of facile routes
to homochirality that may help to understand the enantio-
selective formation of carbon–carbon bonds.
3. Conclusions
The results presented herein show the catalytic role of var-
ious polyleucines (and of simple amino acids such as L-ala-
nine and L-leucine) in the enantioselective intermolecular
aldol condensation between cyclohexanone and a series
of aromatic aldehydes. They extend previous observations
on the catalytic role of amino acids, and strengthen the
hypothesis that these and other simple compounds (includ-
ing oligopeptides) could play a key role in prebiotic
catalysis.
References
1. Modern Aldol Reactions; Mahrwald, R., Ed.; Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, 2004; Vols. 1,2.
2. (a) Hayashi, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 8103–8105,
and references cited therein; (b) Hayashi, Y.; Aratake, S.;
Itoh, T.; Okano, T.; Sumiya, T.; Shoji, M. Chem. Commun.
2007, 957–959.
3. (a) Klussmann, M.; White, A. J. R.; Armstrong, A.;
Blackmond, D. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7985–
7989; (b) Klussmann, M.; Iwamura, H.; Matthew, S.; Wells,
D.; Pandya, U.; Armstrong, A.; Blackmond, D. G. Nature
2006, 441, 621–623.
4. Pizzarello, S.; Weber, A. L. Science 2004, 303, 1151.
5. Weber, A. L.; Pizzarello, S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
2006, 103, 12713–12717.
´
6. Cordova, A.; Zou, W.; Dziedzic, P.; Ibrahem, I.; Reyes, E.;
Xu, Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 5383–5397.
7. (a) Cordova, A.; Ibrahem, I.; Casas, J.; Sunden, H.; Engquist,
M.; Reyes, E. Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 4772–4786; (b)
Cordova, A.; Engquist, M.; Ibrahem, I.; Casas, J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8914–8918.
Table 3. Aldol condensation of 4-chlorobenzaldehyde with cyclohexanone
in the presence of PLLs
Catalysta (%)
Reaction Yield drb
eeb anti eeb syn
(%) (%)
´
8. Julia, S.; Masana, J.; Vega, J. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
´
1980, 19, 929–931; Julia, S.; Guixer, J.; Masana, J.; Rocas, J.;
time (h)
(%)
(anti/syn)
Colonna, S.; Annuziata, R.; Molinari, H. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1982, 1317–1321; Porter, M. J.; Skidmore, J.
Chem. Commun. 2000, 1215–1217; Gerlach, A.; Geller, T.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1247–1249.
D-PLL ee 9.1
D-PLL ee 20
L-PLL ee 20
168
168
168
0
2
7
1.8:1
1.8:1
1.3:1
11
7
4.5
12
7
14
L-PLL ee 42.9 168
10
9. Carrea, G.; Colonna, S.; Meek, A. D.; Ottolina, G.; Roberts,
S. M. Chem. Commun. 2004, 1412–1413; Carrea, G.; Col-
onna, S.; Kelly, D. R.; Lazcano, A.; Ottolina, G.; Roberts, S.
M. Trends Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 507–513.
a Reaction conditions: cyclohexanone (1.5 mmol), 4-chlorobenzaldehyde
(0.5 mmol), PLL catalyst (0.05 mmol) in DMSO/H2O (2.0 mL/0.1 mL).
b Determined by chiral phase HPLC analysis using AD Chiralcel column.