6
Tetrahedron
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
obtained products, was confirmed by UPLC-MS/MS
To an aqueous solution of FeSO4·7H2O/DTPA (1 mM/1 mM,
experiments using 18O-labeled reagents. This mechanism was
further validated by observing the influence of various reaction
conditions on the reaction rate and product distribution.
100 µL) was added water, 80% MeCN/H2O, or 80% EtOH/H2O
(100 µL) and CYPMPO aqueous solution (310 mM, 10 µL). The
spectra were recorded in a 25 ꢀL glass capillary 15 min after
mixing. Typically, the instrumental settings were as follows:
center field, 326.4 mT; sweep width, ±7.5 mT; field modulation
frequency, 100 kHz; field modulation width, 0.2 mT; amplitude,
500; sweep time, 1 min; time constant, 0.03 s; microwave
frequency, 9163.310 MHz; and microwave power, 0.998 mW.
The ESR spectrum of manganese held in the ESR cavity was
used as an internal standard.
As H2O2 is a reactive oxygen species that is present in many
biological systems, it is likely that the degradation products
formed by reactions between anthocyanins and H2O2 are also
present in anthocyanin-containing foods. However, the potential
benefits of these products to human health remain under debate.
In addition, as the contents of these products in various plant
species are expected to increase post-harvest, they could
potentially be used to determine the freshness of anthocyanin-
containing fruits and vegetables. Furthermore, although
anthocyanins are important plant-derived pigments, they are
rather unstable. We therefore expect that the results presented
herein will aid in the development of novel methods for
improving the stability of the anthocyanin structure. Further
studies on anthocyanin stability are now in progress.
4.4. Comparison of the reactivity of 1 in various solvents
To a solution of compound 1 (1 mg) in H2O (200 ꢀL, 10 mM)
was added aqueous H2O2 (100 ꢀL), which was prepared from
30% aqueous H2O2 by diluting 400 times with H2O. The resulting
solution was stirred at 40 °C and HPLC analyses were performed
after 0, 1, 2, and 4 h. The HPLC analysis conditions were as
follows: COSMOSIL 5C18-MS-II (4.6 mm id × 150 mm; Nacalai
Tesque Inc., Kyoto, Japan); mobile phase, 0.5% TFA/12%
aqueous MeCN; flow rate, 1.0 mL/min; system temperature, 35
°C; and detection wavelength, 520 nm. The reaction was
monitored using the peak area of compound 1. The above
reaction was repeated using DMSO, DMF, EtOH, and
MeCN/H2O as the solvent instead of H2O.
4. Experimental section
4.1. General
Cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (1) was isolated from a black bean
extract, which was a kind gift from Nagara Science Co. (Gifu,
Japan), and recrystallized from a mixture of 5–10% HCl in
methanol (MeOH).21,22 H2O2 solution (30% (w/w) in H2O, 9.8 M)
and all organic solvents were purchased from Wako Pure
Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan).
4.5. Confirmation of the oxidation mechanism using H218O or
H218O2
To confirm the proposed oxidation mechanism, the reaction
was performed according to the procedure described in Section
4.4 using H218O or H218O2 instead of H2O or H2O2, respectively.
All reaction mixtures were analyzed by UPLC–TOF-MS. For the
analysis of compound 2, the mobile phase was composed of 0.5%
formic acid/10% MeCN in H2O, whereas for the analysis of
compound 4, 0.5% formic acid/15% MeCN in H2O was used.
The flow rate was set at 0.2 mL/min and the ESI interface was
operated in negative ion mode. The MS parameters for the
analysis were as follows: capillary potential, 0.6 kV; sampling
cone, 13 V; desolvation temperature, 500 °C; source temperature,
150 °C; desolvation gas flow, 1000 L Ar/h; and cone gas flow, 50
L Ar/h. The mass spectrometer was operated in MS/MS mode
with a collision cell energy of 13 V.
ESR analysis was performed using a JEOL JES-FA100
spectrometer (Tokyo, Japan). The spin-trapping reagent
CYPMPO was purchased from Shidai Systems (Saitama, Japan).
NMR spectra were recorded on a JEOL ECA-500 or a JEOL
ECA-600 instrument (Tokyo, Japan) using TMS as an internal
standard. UPLC–ESI-MS was performed using a Waters Xevo
G2 QTOF mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA)
equipped with a C18 analytical column (ACQUITY UPLC BEH
C18 column, 2.1 mm id × 100 mm; Waters, Milford, MA, USA).
The mobile phase was composed of 0.5 vol% acetic acid, 10
vol% aqueous MeCN, or 15 vol% aqueous MeCN. All analyses
were conducted at 35 °C, and the flow rate was set at 0.2
mL/min. HPLC analyses were performed using a JASCO PU-
2089 intelligent pump equipped with a JASCO MD-2010 PDA
detector and a JASCO CO-2065 column oven (Tokyo, Japan). A
COSMOSIL 5C18-MS-II column (4.6 mm id × 150 mm; Nacalai
Tesque Inc., Kyoto, Japan) and a NB-ODS-9 column (10 mm id
× 250 mm; Nagara Science Co., Ltd., Gifu, Japan) were used for
analytical and preparative HPLC, respectively.
Acknowledgement
This work was partially supported by Nagara Science Co.,
Ltd.
Declarations of interest: none
4.2. Reaction of 1 with H2O2 in 80% aqueous MeCN
Supplementary data
Compound 1 (30.0 mg) was dissolved in 80% aqueous MeCN
(6 mL) prior to the addition of aqueous H2O2 (24.5 mM, 3 mL)
that had been diluted 400 times using 80% aqueous MeCN. The
resulting solution was stirred at 40 °C for 8 h. Subsequently, the
reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, MeCN was
removed under reduced pressure, and the resulting residue was
subjected to column chromatography using HP20SS resin
(Mitsubishi Chemical Co., Tokyo, Japan). Elution was achieved
using MeOH after washing with two column volumes of water to
remove H2O2. The sample was purified by HPLC (column: NB-
ODS-9, 10 mm id × 250 mm) using MeCN/H2O (10:90 v/v)
containing 0.5% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) to yield compounds 2
(57%) and 3 (9%). The chemical structure of compound 2 was
confirmed by comparison with literature NMR data.14
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found
References
1. Harborne JB, Ed. The Flavonoids: Advances in Research Since
1986; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1994.
2. Harborne JB, Williams CA. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1998;15:631–652.
3. Castañeda-Ovando A, Pacheco-Hernández ML, Páez-Hernández
ME, Rodríguez JA, Galán-Vidal CA. Food Chem. 2009;113:859–
871.
4. Zhang K-M, Yu H-J, Shi K, Zhou Y-H, Yu J-Q, Xia X-J. Plant
Sci. 2010;179:202–208.
5. Bi X, Zhang J, Chen C, Zhang D, Li P, Ma F. Food Chem.
2014;152:205–209.
4.3. ESR spectra