H-Bonded Ubiquinol-0 and Other (Poly)methoxy Phenols
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 122, No. 10, 2000 2359
Table 3. Equilibrium Constants for Intermolecular Hydrogen Bonding of Methoxy-Substituted Phenols with Various Solventsa
2-MeOb
2-MeOc
2,6-(MeO)2
2,4-(MeO)2
ubiquinol-0c
4-MeOc
c
c
tetrachloromethane
benzene
acetonitrile
ethyl acetate
tert-butyl alcohol
0.02
0.03
0.30
0.61
0.71
0.01
0.25
0.51
0.60
0.03
0.24
0.49
0.27
0.02
0.24
0.40
0.68
0.04
0.41
0.56
0.64
0.03
1.7
2.7
7.0
a Kinter-HB in M-1 (error approximately (15%), calculated with eq 5 with the solvent concentration as used in the LFP experiment: The neat
liquid when dicumyl peroxide was used or 70 vol % when di-tert-butyl peroxide was used. Kinter-HB values derived this way are apparent values
because solvent concentrations are used instead of activities. b Calculated with respect to the rate constant in pentane. c Calculated with respect to
the rate constants in CCl4.
and in solution.26 It seems reasonable to assume that the
abstraction of doubly hydrogen bonded phenolic hydrogen atoms
does not occur.
results in an enthalpy for this hydrogen bond of -2.9 kcal
mol-1 32
As expected, ∆Hinter-HB for the additional hydrogen
.
bond is lower than the value for 4-methoxyphenol and ethyl
acetate of -4.5 kcal mol-1 as measured by photoacoustic
calorimetry.5,33 For the other solvents, ∆Hinter-HB for hydrogen-
bond formation with the o-methoxyphenols becomes ca. 1.0 kcal
mol-1 for benzene (K′inter-HB ca. 0.03 M-1), -2.5 kcal mol-1
for acetonitrile (K′inter-HB ca. 0.3 M-1), and -3.0 kcal mol-1
for tert-butyl alcohol (K′inter-HB ca. 0.7 M-1).
Ubiquinol and r-Tocopherol. Ubiquinol-0 has been shown
to possess the same hydrogen-bonding properties as the other
o-methoxyphenols studied. Exactly the same behavior is ex-
pected for ubiquinol-10, the natural antioxidant present in human
LDL. The two phenolic groups will be hydrogen bonded to their
adjacent methoxy groups, thus preventing the formation of
strong hydrogen bonds with solvent molecules or polar solutes.
In this way, part of the phenolic hydrogen atoms remain
available for hydrogen atom abstraction even in a strong HBA
environment. This is important in the LDL particle where
ubiquinol together with R-tocopherol perform their antioxidant
function. The LDL particle is not homogeneous and consists
of a core of neutral lipids and a coat of polar lipids,1 capable of
accepting hydrogen bonds.
The rate constant for hydrogen atom abstraction from
R-tocopherol by tert-butoxyl radical in tetrachloromethane is
4.2 × 109 M-1 s-1,4 close to our value for ubiquinol-0 of 2.8
× 109 M-1 s-1 in the same solvent. This is in agreement with
the small difference in BDE(O-H) for both compounds,
77.3 kcal mol-1 for R-tocopherol6 and 78.5 kcal mol-1 for
ubiquinol-05 (the latter value includes the enthalpy involved in
breaking the intramolecular hydrogen bond). In HBA solvents,
however, R-tocopherol is not protected against strong solvent
interactions and in ethyl acetate k4 decreases to 2.9 × 108 M-1
s-1,4 a factor of 2 lower than the 5.6 × 108 M-1 s-1 found for
ubiquinol-0 (Table 1).
The same differences in kinetic solvent effects have been
found in antioxidant studies: In a non-HBA environment,
ubiquinol-10 is about 10 times less reactive than R-tocopherol
toward peroxyl radicals.34 In aqueous lipid dispersions, however,
both compounds show equal antioxidant activity.35 In the polar
environment the rate of hydrogen atom abstraction from
The slopes of the log(k4/M-1s-1) vs âH2 lines in Figure 3 for
the three o-methoxyphenols and ubiquinol-0 are equal and,
hence, the fraction of available phenolic compound for hydrogen
atom abstraction is the same (kinetic solvent effect).27 The slope
of ca. -2.0 is significantly smaller than the slope for 4-meth-
oxyphenol (-4.2) and phenol (-5.2),28 which is reasonable since
a hydroxyl group already firmly involved in an intramolecular
hydrogen bond can be only a poor hydrogen bond donor to a
HBA solvent.
Equilibrium Constants for Intermolecular Hydrogen
Bonding. From the rate constants measured in different solvents,
the equilibrium constants for intermolecular hydrogen bonding
with the solvent can be calculated with the aid of eq 5.2,3,29 For
2-methoxyphenol K′inter-HB (see Scheme 1) was calculated with
respect to the rate constant measured in pentane, a non-HBA
solvent. For the other phenols measurements in pentane were
not possible due to low solubility, instead the equilibrium
constants were calculated with respect to the rate constant
measured in the poor HBA solvent CCl4, for comparison the
K′inter-HB values for 2-methoxyphenol were also calculated this
way (Table 3). For the ortho-substituted phenols this is the
equilibrium constant for the formation of the additional hydrogen
bond of the intramolecularly hydrogen-bonded molecule with
the solvent.30
S
S
kC4 Cl ) k4(1 + Kinter-HB[S])
(5)
4
The K′inter-HB values in one solvent are very similar for all
o-methoxyphenols, see Table 3, and will be close to the K′inter-HB
for 2-methoxyphenol calculated with respect to pentane. The
equilibrium constant of around 0.6 M-1 for the intermolecular
hydrogen bonding of o-methoxyphenols with ethyl acetate
(25) (a) Jerslev, B.; Larsen, S. Acta Chem. Scand. 1991, 45, 285-91.
(b) Stomberg, R.; Hauteville, M.; Lundquist, K. Acta Chem. Scand. 1988,
B42, 697-707. (c) Velavan, R.; Sureshkumar, P.; Sivakumar, K.; Natarajan,
S. Acta Crystallogr. 1995, C51, 1131-3.
(26) Bureiko, S. F.; Golubev, N. S.; Pihlaja, K. J. Mol. Struct. 1999,
480-481, 297-301.
(27) The observed rate constant for 2,6-dimethoxyphenol in tert-butyl
alcohol is higher than could be expected from the hydrogen bond accepting
properties of the solvent. This may be caused by steric hindrance to the
formation of the intermolecular hydrogen bond.
(31) Jawed, I. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1977, 50, 2602-5.
(32) Using ∆Sinter-HB ) 10.7 cal mol-1 K-1 derived for hydrogen bonding
of 2-methoxyphenol with ethyl acetate.5
(28) Data from refs 3 and 4.
(33) Intermolecularly hydrogen bonded complexes of the two forms of
2-methoxyphenol with formaldehyde (as model for ethyl acetate) were also
calculated by DFT, resulting in ∆Hinter-HB of -4.1 kcal mol-1 for the
intramolecularly hydrogen bonded form and -5.9 kcal mol-1 for the non-
hydrogen bonded form. The difference of 1.8 kcal mol-1 is comparable to
the difference of 1.6 kcal mol-1 for the experimental intermolecular
hydrogen bond enthalpies of 2-methoxyphenol and 4-methoxyphenol with
ethyl acetate.
(34) Barclay, L. R. C.; Vinqvist, M. R.; Mukai, K.; Itoh, S.; Morimoto,
H. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 7416-20.
(35) Ingold, K. U.; Bowry, V. W.; Stocker, R.; Walling, C. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993, 90, 45-9.
(29) Banks, J. T.; Ingold, K. U.; Lusztyk, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 8, 6790-1. Correction: Banks, J. T.; Ingold, K. U.; Lusztyk, J. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 12485.
(30) The equilibrium constant derived for 4-methoxyphenol and aceto-
nitrile of 1.7 M-1 is low compared to 3.7 M-1 measured by infrared
spectroscopy.31 This appears to be a general phenomenon: equilibrium
constants derived by kinetic methods have been found to be lower than
those obtained by the IR method.29 Also, from our photoacoustic calorimetric
value for ∆Hinter-HB for 4-methoxyphenol and ethyl acetate of 4.5 kcal
mol-1,5 the equilibrium constant would be 9 M-1, again significantly higher
than the 2.7 M-1 from the kinetic results.