A. Shatsauskas et al.
Dyes and Pigments 187 (2021) 109072
mol/l), 1.0 ml of a FeNH4(SO4)2⋅12H2O solution (c = 6.0∙10ꢀ 3 mol/l),
and 0.5–1.00 ml of a solution of the test compound (c = 0.1 mg/ml) (SM,
Table SC1-SC3, Figures SC1-SC3). Before studying antioxidant activity
of the tested compounds, the possibility of complexation of these re-
agents with Fe2+ ions was studied. These compounds do not form
complexes with Fe2+, which is confirmed by the absence of significant
deviations from additivity in the spectra of solutions containing the re-
agent and the Fe2+ salt (in the ratio of Fe2+:R = 1:3).
The calculation of the concentrations of compounds was carried out
according to the following formulas:
[H2O2] = [H2O2]0⋅Va/(V0+Va);
[FD] = [FD]0 ⋅ I/I0;
where [H2O2] и [H2O2]0 – final and initial concentrations of hydrogen
peroxide, respectively, μM; V0 – initial volume of a solution containing
FD and HRP; Va – additive volume of H2O2; [FD] and [FD]0 – final and
initial concentration of the fluorescent dye, respectively, μM; I – fluo-
3.2. Synthesis
rescence intensity after adding hydrogen peroxide; I0 – fluorescence
intensity before addition of hydrogen peroxide.
Procedures for the syntheses of 7-aryl[1,3]oxazolo[5,4-b]pyridin-2
(1H)-ones 1–3, 3-amino-4-arylpyridine-2(1H)-ones 4–6, 1-alkyl-5-
methyl-7-phenyl[1,3]oxazolo[5,4-b]pyridin-2(1H)-ones 7b, 7j, and N-
(6-methyl-2-oxo-4-phenyl-1,2-dihydropyridin-3-yl)acetamide 16 have
been reported earlier in Ref. [18,20,25,30]. Synthesis methods and
spectral data for all the synthesized compounds are presented in SM
(Section A).
Next, a graph was plotted as a function of the molar concentration of
the compound oxidized after the addition of hydrogen peroxide versus
the molar concentration of hydrogen peroxide added to the system. The
stoichiometry of the HRP-catalyzed oxidation of the tested compounds
with hydrogen peroxide was determined from the slope of the obtained
curves.
3.3.3. Determination of the limits of detection
3.3. Study of HRP-catalyzed oxidation of luminescent dyes with hydrogen
peroxide
To determine the limit of detection of H2O2 by fluorimetry using
fluorescent dyes 4–6, 8a, 8e, we used the data obtained by titrating 1 μM
dye solutions with a hydrogen peroxide solution. A graph was plotted as
a function of the relative intensity (I/I0) of fluorescence versus the molar
All solutions were prepared in distilled water, additionally purified
on a Milli-Q device (Millipore, USA). HRP (CAT #P8125) was purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). HRP was dissolved in 20 mM phosphate-
buffered saline, pH 7.4 (A403/A275 = 2.8–3.0), and its concentration
was determined spectrophotometrically (ε403 = 100 mMꢀ 1 cmꢀ 1) [38].
Hydrogen peroxide (30%) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA) and
its concentration was confirmed spectrophotometrically (ε240 = 39.4
ratio H2O2/FD. LODH2O2 was calculated using the formula: LODH2O2
=
3*SD/k1 [34], where SD is the standard deviation of the fluorescence
signal, k1 is the slope of the regression line obtained for the experimental
data.
To determine the limits of detection for HRP, HRP at various con-
centrations was added to solutions containing fluorescent dye (4–6, 8a,
8e) and H2O2 (SM, section D). The mixtures were incubated at 37 ◦C for
15 min, then fluorescence was recorded on a Tecan Infinite F200
microplate reader (Austria) in 96 well plates using excitation and
emission wavelengths of 360 ± 12.5 and 465 ± 17.5 nm, respectively.
Changes in the fluorescence intensity of compounds were converted to
changes in compound concentrations. Next, a graph was plotted as a
function of the molar concentration of the compound oxidized after the
addition of hydrogen peroxide versus the molar concentration of HRP
M
ꢀ 1 cmꢀ 1 [39]).
Stock solutions of fluorescent dyes (4–6, 8a, 8e, 8j) (100 mM) were
prepared in DMSO and their concentrations were determined spectro-
photometrically (using the extinction coefficients presented in Table 1).
Fresh solutions of fluorescent dyes, HRP, and H2O2 were prepared
before each experiment.
3.3.1. Oxidation of fluorescent dyes
Oxidation of the tested compounds was evaluated by the decrease in
the fluorescence intensity with time. Measurements were performed in
20 mM phosphate buffered saline (PBS) in the absence and presence of
hydrogen peroxide at 37 ◦C on a Tecan Infinite F200 microplate reader
(Australia) in 96 well plates (Greiner 655076). The excitation wave-
length was 360 ± 12.5 nm, and the emission wavelength was 465 ±
added to the system. LODHRP was calculated as follows [37]: LODHRP
=
3⋅RMSE/k2, where RMSE – root mean square error of linear regression;
k2 – linear regression slope.
The calculation of standard deviations, root mean square errors of
the model and slope coefficients of linear regression was carried out
using the LibreOffice 6.4 Calc and QtiPlot 0.9.8.9 software packages.
17.5 nm. The final concentration of fluorescent dyes was 100
μ
M, the
final concentration of hydrogen peroxide was 500
μM. In both cases, no
oxidation reaction of fluorescent dyes was observed. To study the effect
of HRP on the oxidation of fluorescent dyes, HRP was added to a mixture
Declaration of competing interest
containing fluorescent dyes (at a final concentration of 100 μM) and
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial
interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence
the work reported in this paper.
H2O2 (at a final concentration of 50 μM). The final concentration of the
enzyme varied from 9 to 145 nM. The initial rates were determined from
the slope of the initial linear region of the kinetic curves. At least five
independent experiments were performed and the mean values of the
initial rates were calculated. Next, a graph was plotted of the depen-
dence of the average values of the initial rates (converted into changes in
the concentration of the fluorescent dyes) on the molar concentration of
HRP.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Grant
no. 19-13-00273).
Appendix A. Supplementary data
3.3.2. Stoichiometry of HRP-catalyzed oxidation of fluorescent dyes
Stock solutions of the fluorescent dyes (4–6, 8a, 8e, 8j) (100 mM)
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.
were used to prepare working solutions (1 μM and 100 μM) in PBS (pH
7.4). Then the dyes were titrated with hydrogen peroxide in the presence
of HRP (SM, section D). The oxidation of the tested compounds was
evaluated by the decrease in the fluorescence intensity. Measurements
were performed on a Cary Eclipse spectrofluorimeter (Varian, Australia)
using standard 1 cm quartz cells at room temperature using the wave-
lengths shown in Table 1.
References
6