Communication
ChemComm
still occur even if probably reduced. Interestingly, at 4 1C the Notes and references
amount of internalisation via direct translocation increases
§ Syntheses of the lipopeptides: Boc-Arg(Tos)4-Lys(Fmoc)-MBHA was
synthesised by SPPS on a MBHA Resin. Activation was accomplished
with DCC/HOBt in NMP. After Fmoc deprotection by piperidine, the
fluorophore was introduced on the lysine side chain by reacting, in
DMF, NBD-Cl (4 eq.) with DIEA (10 eq.). The saturated acyl chains were
introduced at the N-terminus of this peptidyl resin, after Boc deprotec-
tion by trifluoroacetic acid, and on-resin acylation of the N–ter arginine
with the corresponding fatty acid pre-activated by DCC/HOBT. The final
lipopetides were cleaved from the support by HF in the presence of
anisole and Et2S. For the preparation of the unsaturated lipopeptides,
Arg4-Lys(NBD)-NH2 was obtained after cleavage from the support and
this crude peptide was acylated in solution with the corresponding
N-hydroxysuccinimic ester of the unsaturated fatty acid. The crude
peptides were lyophilised before purification by HPLC or Fast Centri-
fugal Partition Chromatography leading to purity Z97%. The purified
peptides were characterised by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry,
(cf. S1 in ESI†).
significantly with the number of insaturation(s) from C18:0-Arg4
to C18:1-Arg4 and C18:2-Arg4. The most efficient lipopeptide at 4 1C
was found to be as hypothetised C22:6-Arg4, when the C18:0-Arg4
lipopeptide and the control NBD-Arg9 are poorly internalised. Thus,
the direct translocation pathway is dramatically enhanced for
the polyunsaturated C22:6-Arg4. The entry at 4 1C of the four
lipopeptides C18:0-Arg4, C18:1-Arg4, C18:2-Arg4 and C22:6-Arg4
was further analysed with the four different cell lines by confocal
microscopy (Fig. 2). In every cases the most unsaturated lipopeptide
C22:6-Arg4 was found to be the best one in the four cell lines with
an intense labelling of the cells at 4 1C after 60 min incubation,
even though C18:2-Arg4 was not always better than C18:1-Arg4 (this
difference was systematically observed with RAW cells). Further-
more, most of the cells are labelled with the C22:6-Arg4, showing
that the internalisation was homogenous at that concentration and
peptide/cell ratio.
1 A. Prochiantz, Trends Cell Biol., 1998, 8, 84.
2 S. Pujals, J. Fernandez-Carneado, C. Lopez-Iglesias, M. J. Kogan and
E. Giralt, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 2006, 1758, 264.
¨
¨
3 F. Madani, S. Lindberg, U. Langel, S. Futaki and A. Graslund,
J. Biophys., 2011, 414729.
The intracellular localisations of C18:0-Arg4 and C22:6-Arg4
were compared by confocal microscopy after 60 min incubation
with MA-104 cells at 4 1C or 37 1C. At 4 1C, the internalisation of
C18:0-Arg4 is too faint to allow co-localisation experiments,
(Fig. 2A). In contrast, at 4 1C the cytosol of the MA-104 cells is
densely labelled by C22:6-Arg4, (Fig. 2A) and most of the fluores-
cence co-localised with the Golgi membranes, but not at all with
lysosomes (cf. S8 in ESI†). At 37 1C, C18:0-Arg4 is internalised to a
larger extent in MA-104 cells, however most of the fluorescence is
punctuated and co-localised with lysosomes, (Fig. 3). In contrast,
the fluorescence of C22:6-Arg4 in MA-104 cells is more diffuse
in the cytosol and with a dense labelling, which co-localised with
the Golgi membranes (Fig. 3A), but barely with lysosomes
(Fig. 3B). Altogether, these data showing a faster entry by direct
translocation and a cytosolic distribution for C22:6-Arg4 validate
the original hypothesis: unsaturated chain promotes for this
short oligo-arginine lipopeptide membrane translocation vs.
endocytosis. It might be hypothesized that if the lipopeptide
were internalised by endocytosis the presence of unsaturations
might for the same reasons promote its endosomal escape.
Approaches to improve intracellular targeting involve either
a direct transfer through the plasma membrane or/and a necessary
escape from endosomes. Acylation of a short cationic peptide by
cis unsaturated chain(s) provides at last a new rational CPP
modification,24 to promote cytosolic localisation by favouring
the direct translocation pathway.
4 E. Koren and V. P. Torchilin, Trends Mol. Med., 2012, 18, 385.
5 A. T. Jones and E. J. Sayers, J. Controlled Release, 2012, 161, 582.
6 I. Nakase, H. Akita, K. Kogure, A. Graslund, U. Langel, H. Harashima
and S. Futaki, Acc. Chem. Res., 2012, 45, 1132.
7 E. G. Stanzl, B. M. Trantow, J. R. Vargas and P. A. Wender, Acc. Chem.
Res., 2013, 46, 2944.
8 C.-Y. Jiao, D. Delaroche, F. Burlina, I. D. Alves, G. Chassaing and
S. Sagan, J. Biol. Chem., 2009, 284, 33957.
´
9 S. A. Bode, M. Thevenin, C. Bechara, S. Sagan, S. Bregant, S. Lavielle,
G. Chassaing and F. Burlina, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 7179.
10 J.-P. Berlose, O. Convert, D. Derossi, A. Brunissen and G. Chassaing,
Eur. J. Biochem., 1996, 242, 372.
11 J.-M. Swiecicki, A. Bartsch, J. Tailhades, M. Di Pisa, B. Heller,
G. Chassaing, C. Mansuy, F. Burlina and S. Lavielle, ChemBioChem,
2014, 15, 884.
12 M. Di Pisa, G. Chassaing and J.-M. Swiecicki, Biochemistry, 2015,
54, 194.
13 M. Di Pisa, G. Chassaing and J.-M. Swiecicki, J. Pept. Sci., 2015, 21, 356.
´
´
14 J.-M. Swiecicki, M. Di Pisa, F. Burlina, P. Lecorche, C. Mansuy,
G. Chassaing and S. Lavielle, Biopolymers, 2015, DOI: 10.1002/
bip.22652.
15 V. T. Armstrong, M. R. Brzustowicz, S. R. Wassall, L. J. Jenski and
W. Stillwell, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 2003, 414, 74.
16 S. Futaki, W. Ohashi, T. Suzuki, M. Niwa, S. Tanaka, K. Ueda,
H. Harashima and Y. Sugiura, Bioconjugate Chem., 2001, 12, 1005.
17 W. Pham, M. F. Kircher, R. Weissleder and C. H. Tung, ChemBioChem,
2004, 5, 1148–1151.
18 J. S. Lee and C. H. Tung, Mol. BioSyst., 2010, 6, 2049.
19 S. Katayama, H. Hirose, K. Takayama and I. Nakase S. Futaki,
J. Controlled Release, 2011, 149, 29.
20 D. Oh, A. N. Shirazi, K. Northup, B. Sullivan, R. Tiwari, K. M. Bisoffi
and K. Parang, Mol. Pharmaceutics, 2014, 11, 2845.
21 W. C. Wimley, ACS Chem. Biol., 2010, 5, 905.
22 J. T. Green, S. K. Orr and R. P. Bazinet, J. Lipid Res., 2008, 49, 939.
23 F. Duchardt, M. Fotin-Mleczek, H. Schwarz, R. Fischer and R. Brock,
Traffic, 2007, 8, 848.
This work was supported in part by funding from ANR:
J12R139 ‘‘ELIPTIC’’. The authors acknowledge Dr A.-M. Faussat,
R. Morrichon and A. Munier from the Plate-Forme d’Imagerie
Cellulaire Microscopie Confocale, UMPC – IFR 65.
¨
24 D. M. Copolovici, K. Langel, E. Eriste and U. Langel, ACS Nano, 2014,
8, 1972.
Chem. Commun.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015