2
Z. Agheli et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure xxx (xxxx) xxx
[1,5-a]pyridine) and 2 (3-nitropyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridine) were syn-
thesized according to the procedures reported in the literatures
[21,22]. Other reagents were purchased from Merck. All solvents
were dried according to standard procedures.
2.2.3. (2E,3E)-2-(Cyano(4-methoxyphenyl)methylene)-3-
(hydroxyimino)-2,3-dihydropyrazolo [1,5-a]pyridin-8-ium-1-ide
(4c)
Compound 4c was obtained as purple powder, yield (84%), mp
Melting points were obtained on an Electrothermaltype-9100
melting-point apparatus. The FT-IR (as KBr discs) spectra were
measured on a Tensor 27 spectrometer and only noteworthy ab-
sorptions are listed. The 13C NMR (75 MHz), the 1H NMR (300 MHz)
and NOESY spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance DRX-300
spectrometer. Chemical shifts are reported in ppm downfield
from TMS as internal standard; coupling constant J is given in Hz.
The mass spectra were obtained on a Varian Mat, CH-7 at 70 eV.
Elemental analysis was performed on a Thermo Finnigan Flash EA
microanalyzer. Absorption and fluorescence spectra were recorded
on Varian 50-bio UVeVisible spectrophotometer and Varian Cary
Eclipse spectrofluorophotometer. UVevis scans were obtained
from 200 to 800 nm. Cyclic voltammograms were recorded on a
797 V A Computrace Metrohm. Tetrabutylammonium perchlorate
(TBAP) was utilized used as the supporting electrolyte and a plat-
inum wire served as a counter electrode and Ag/AgCl (KCl 3 M) was
used as a reference electrode. The concentrations used to obtain
each voltammogram are given in the corresponding figure caption.
Voltage-Current analyses were done using an EIS-26H model of
Potentiostat-Galvanostat at 5 V.
199e201 ꢀC; 1H NMR (DMSO‑d6)
d 3.83 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.65 (t,
J ¼ 7.5 Hz, 1H, Ar H), 7.15 (d, J ¼ 8.7 Hz, 1H, Ar H), 7.31 (d, J ¼ 8.4 Hz,
2H, Ar H), 7.65 (t, J ¼ 7.5 Hz, 1H, Ar H), 8.19 (d, J ¼ 8.4 Hz, 2H, Ar H),
8.99 (d, J ¼ 6.9 Hz, 1H, Ar H), 13.49 (br s, 1H, OH); 13C NMR
(DMSO‑d6)
d 57.3, 117.3, 117.9, 125.1, 126.6, 127.7, 129.4, 131.5, 132.8,
134.7, 134.9, 136.2, 145.7, 157.9; IR (KBr): 3452 cmꢁ1 (OH),
2193 cmꢁ1 (CN). MS (m/z) 292 (Mþ). Anal. Calcd for C16H12N4O2
(292.3): C, 65.75; H, 4.14; N, 19.17. Found: C, 66.11; H, 4.16; N, 18.98.
2.3. Computational details
All of the DFT method calculations have been performed by
using the B3LYP functional [23] and 6-311 þ G(d,p) basis sets. The
Gaussian 03 program [24] was used. Geometries of the investigated
species were fully optimized, which were used for the comple-
mentary calculations. The optimized geometries don’t show any
imaginary frequency. In the frequency calculations, the DFT-
calculated vibrational frequencies are higher than the experi-
mental ones. Since, the calculated vibrational frequencies were
improved by applying the scale factor of 0.9614 [25]. The gauge-
including atomic orbital (GIAO) method [26] was used to predict
the 1H NMR chemical shifts of the investigated compounds with
respect to the tetramethylsilane (TMS) in DMSO‑d6 as the solvent.
Also, the NBO analysis was performed to identify highest-occupied-
molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest-unoccupied-molecular
orbital (LUMO) frontier orbitals. The Chemcraft 1.7 program was
employed for visualization of structures [27].
2.2. General procedure for the synthesis of 4aec
Compounds 2 (1.63 g, 10 mmol) and arylacetonitriles 2aec
(12 mmol) were added with stirring to a solution of KOH (20 g,
357 mmol) in MeOH (30 mL). The mixture was refluxed with stir-
ring for 3 h, and then poured into water. The precipitate was
collected by filtration, after neutralization with dilute HCl solution.
Then, it was washed with water and then air dried to give crude
4aec. More purification was obtained by crystallization from
acetone.
In addition to the DFT calculations, the QTAIM was employed to
characterize important bonds and rings. The QTAIM calculations
have been performed using the AIMALL package [28]. The QTAIM
calculations are based on the topological analysis of the electron
density, r(r) [29]. On the other hands, the kinetic energy density (Gb
), the potential energy density (Vb), the total energy density (Hb),
the electron density (
point (BCP) are related to the electron density. These quantities are
used to realize nature of the bonds.
r
) and its Laplacian ðV2rÞ at a bond critical
2.2.1. (2E,3E)-2-(Cyano(phenyl)methylene)-3-(hydroxyimino)-2,3-
dihydropyrazolo [1,5-a]pyridin-8-ium-1-ide (4a)
Compound 4a was obtained as purple powder, yield (79%), mp
210e212 ꢀC; 1H NMR (DMSO‑d6)
d
6.56 (t, J ¼ 7.5 Hz, 1H, Ar H), 7.09
2.4. Photoelectrochemical measurements
(d, J ¼ 8.7 Hz, 1H, Ar H), 7.25 (t, J ¼ 7.5 Hz, 1H, Ar H), 7.43 (t,
J ¼ 8.3 Hz, 2H, Ar H), 7.58e7.64 (m, 1H, Ar H), 8.16 (d, J ¼ 8.3 Hz, 2H,
Ar H), 9.01 (d, J ¼ 6.9 Hz, 1H, Ar H), 13.44 (br s, 1H, OH); 13C NMR
To investigate the properties of the solar cells which made by
our dyes (DSSCs), we used titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles in
rutile phase (p-25), (Iꢁ/I3ꢁ) standard electrolyte, acetic acid (99%
sigma Aldrich), ethanol (99% Merck) and FTO glasses.
For DSSCs fabrication, FTO glasses cleaned 3 times with deion-
ized water, acetone and ethanol in ultrasonic bath, and their
conductive side was determined by Ohm meter. Then TiO2 paste
was deposited on one of them by Doctor Blade’s method [30]. TiO2
paste was prepared using TiO2 nano powder (2 g) which were
grinded in mortar by adding three drops acetic acid.
During grinding process two another drops of acetic acid were
added in order to making colloidal paste with fluid and uniform
consistency. In the next step, 0.2 g polyethylene glycol (2000) and
deionized water were added and mixed with the paste completely
to make that sticky. This process causes paste to stick better to the
slide. After a while, when the paste was dried to some extent, the
slides were heated in oven in 450 ꢀC for 30 min. The dried slides
were placed in dyes for 20 h.
(DMSO‑d6)
d 118.3, 119.7, 125.2, 126.4, 128.6, 128.9, 130.3, 130.8,
133.6, 134.8, 136.3, 145.7, 156.4; IR (KBr): 3455 cmꢁ1 (OH),
2190 cmꢁ1 (CN). MS (m/z) 262 (Mþ). Anal. Calcd for C15H10N4O
(262.3): C, 68.69; H, 3.84; N, 21.36. Found: C, 69.02; H, 3.86; N,
21.12.
2.2.2. (2E,3E)-2-((4-Chlorophenyl)(cyano)methylene)-3-
(hydroxyimino)-2,3-dihydropyrazolo [1,5-a]pyridin-8-ium-1-ide
(4b)
Compound 4b was obtained as purple powder, yield (83%), mp
228e230 ꢀC; 1H NMR (DMSO‑d6)
d
6.63 (t, J ¼ 7.5 Hz, 1H, Ar H), 7.12
(d, J ¼ 8.7 Hz, 1H, Ar H), 7.46 (d, J ¼ 8.6 Hz, 2H, Ar H), 7.67 (t,
J ¼ 7.5 Hz, 1H, Ar H), 8.20 (d, J ¼ 8.6 Hz, 2H, Ar H), 9.05 (d, J ¼ 6.9 Hz,
1H, Ar H), 13.53 (br s, 1H, OH); 13C NMR (DMSO‑d6)
d 117.8, 118.5,
125.3, 126.0, 128.2, 129.3, 130.9, 131.3, 133.4, 134.5, 137.8, 145.0,
159.8; IR (KBr): 3453 cmꢁ1 (OH), 2199 cmꢁ1 (CN). MS (m/z) 296
(Mþ), 298 (Mþ þ 2). Anal. Calcd for C15H9ClN4O (296.7): C, 60.72; H,
3.06; N, 18.88. Found: C, 61.08; H, 3.09; N, 18.59.
Counter electrodes were fabricated depositing Pt paste on FTO.
These deposited FTO were connected to those which TiO2 paste was
deposited on and completely were sealed. Then electrolyte was
Please cite this article as: Z. Agheli et al., Synthesis, characterization, optical properties, computational characterizations, QTAIM analysis and
j.molstruc.2019.127228