Chemistry Letters Vol.32, No.7 (2003)
595
On the basis of above results, a formation mechanism of
SrCO3 nanowires was supposed as a directional assembling-re-
construction of colloidal particles. Firstly, some Sr(OH)2 re-
of MOE, P.R.China.
References and Notes
1
À
acted with CO2 to form SrCO3 colloidal particles, and OH an-
R. M. Dickson and L. A. Lyon, J. Phys. Chem. B, 104, 6095
(2000).
ion intended to be adsorbed on the crystal faces parallelling to
the c axis of the primary nuclei, resulting in the anisometric pri-
mary SrCO3 colloidal particles. Then, the colloidal particles as-
sembled in a certain direction through their c axes to form the
particle-particle-like nanowires. The particle-particle-like nano-
wires tended to recombine in solution, and continuous nano-
wires formed as a consequence. Nanowires grew to perfect sin-
gle crystalline when appropriate reconstruction condition was
provided, such as suitable temperature and time.
Since no template was used in the preparation nanowires,
the preferential growth of SrCO3 crystal can be attributed to
the high chemical potential along c axis. On the basis of the in-
fluence of chemical potential on the shape evolution of nano-
crystal elucidated by Peng et al., in the case of one-dimensional
2
Y. M. Lin, S. B. Cronin, J. Y. Ying, M. S. Dresselhaus, and
J. P. Heremans, Appl. Phys. Lett., 76, 3944 (2000).
R. Dagani, Chem. Eng. News, 79, 14 (2001).
J. F. Wang, M. S. Gudiksen, X. F. Duan, Y. Cui, and C. M.
Lieber, Science, 293, 1455 (2001).
3
4
5
6
M. H. Huang, S. Mao, H. Feick, H. Q. Yan, Y. Y. Wu, H.
Kind, E. Weber, R. Russo, and P. D. Yang, Science, 292,
1897 (2001).
M. H. Huang, A. Choudrey, and P. D. Yang, Chem. Com-
mun., 12, 1063 (2000).
7
8
C. R. Martin, Science, 266, 1961 (1994).
C. Huber, M. Sadoqi, T. Huber, and D. Chacko, Adv. Ma-
ter., 7, 316 (1995).
nano-structure growth it would be advantageous to have a high-
which is mainly determined by the
9
L. M. Cao, Z. Zhang, and L. L. Sun, Adv. Mater., 13, 1701
(2001).
er chemical potential,1
5;16
pH value in our work as shown in Figure 2C.
10 D. B. Zhang, L. M. Qi, J. M. Ma, and H. M. Cheng, Chem.
Mater., 13, 2753 (2001).
11 L. M. Huang, H. T. Wang, Z. B. Wang, A. Mitra, K. N.
Bozhilov, and Y. S. Yan, Adv. Mater., 14, 61 (2002).
12 B. H. Hong, S. C. Bae, C. W. Lee, S. Jeong, and K. S. Kim,
Science, 294, 348 (2001).
13 D. B. Zhang, L. M. Qi, J. M. Ma, and H. M. Cheng, Chem.
Mater., 13, 2753 (2001).
14 J. J. Shi, J. J. Li, Y. F. Zhu, F. Wei, and X. R. Zhang, Anal.
Chim. Acta, 466, 69 (2002).
BaCO3 nanowires prepared by the same method showed the
similar morphology, length and diameter with SrCO3 nano-
wires, as shown in Figure 3. This revealed the potential applica-
tion of this method in preparation of other nanowire materials.
The SrCO3 nanowire showed good catalytic performance
for catalytic oxidation of formaldehyde. Its start and complete
ꢀ
ꢀ
combustion temperature was 80 C and 100 C lower than that
of SrCO3 nanoparticle when the initial concentration was
8
ꢀ
00 ppm. Its complete combustion temperature was 140 C low-
er than that of SrCO3 nanoparticle at high concentration
7000 ppm)and it did not lost activity, indicating its great ad-
vantages in the catalytic oxidation of VOC. Besides, its catalytic
15 Z. A. Peng and X. G. Peng, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 123, 1389
(2001).
16 Z. A. Peng and X. G. Peng, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124, 3343
(2002).
17 Since hydrolyzing of SrAl2O4 can be easily controlled, it
was used as source of fresh Sr(OH)2 solution. After SrAl2O4
powder dispersed in distilled water by ultrasonic bath for
(
14
luminescence based on catalytic oxidation of ethanol was in-
ꢀ
tensified linearly with temperature below 360 C and kept con-
stant at higher temperature, indicating the advantages in the per-
formance as chemical luminescence sensor.
1
0 min, the by-produced Al(OH)3 was removed by centrifu-
This work was partly supported by Chinese National
Science Foundation (20071021), Trans-Century Training Pro-
gram Foundation for the Talents by the Ministry of Education,
P.R.C. and supported by the Excellent Young Teacher Program
gation. Then Sr(OH)2 exposed to air at deferent temperature
for desired time. Finally, the product was washed with 10%
NaOH solution and distilled water by turn to removed the
residual Al(OH)3. The TEM analysis was obtained in a Hi-
tachi H-800 system, with accelerating voltage for electron
beam of 200 kV. The preparation of sample for LRS analy-
sis was the same as that for TEM, except for the substrate
was glass. LRS was carried out on Renishaw 2000 system.
XRD experiments were carried out using a Rigaku DMAX-
2
400 diffractometer with Cu Kꢀ radiation. Characterization
of electron diffraction is based on R ¼ K=d (R is the dis-
tance between spot and (000), K is camera constant and d
is the distance between crystal faces)and an important ref-
erence (J. Phys. Chem. B, 101, 3460 (1997)). The important
ꢀ
data were listed as following. Lttice constants a ¼ 5:10 A,
ꢀ
ꢀ
b ¼ 8:40 A,
c ¼ 6:02 A,
and
camera
constant
ꢀ
K ¼ 20:08 mmꢁA. The standard d from JCPDS (84-1778)
Figure 3. As-prepared BaCO3 nanowire.
was applied to calibrate the diffraction spots.
Published on the web (Advance View)June 10, 2003; DOI 10.1246/cl.2003.594