Metabolites of a Blocked Chloramphenicol Producer
J ournal of Natural Products, 2003, Vol. 66, No. 1 65
solvents were altered, but was kept between 6.0 and 7.0 min;
the peak area at 273 nm was used to estimate the chloram-
phenicol concentration in each sample. Unknown metabolites
were estimated as chloramphenicol equivalents by comparing
their peak areas with that of the reference. For some samples,
the detector wavelength differed from 273 nm.
5.2 Hz, J BX ) 7.6 Hz, J AB ) 14.6 Hz), 2.15 (3H, s); partial 13C
NMR (D2O spiked with acetone-d6, 100.6 MHz) δ 173.7, 138.0
(C1′), 133.4 (C4′), 131.4 (C2′,C6′), 123.1 (C3′,C5′), 57.4 (C2),
37.4 (C3), 24.5 (CH3); ESI+MS (MeOH-H2O, 1:1, trace HCO2H,
30 µL/min, 15 V cone) m/z 223 [M + H]+; CID of m/z 223 (30
eV) m/z 206 (44), 177 (100), 164 (41).
TLC An a lysis. Metabolites extracted from cultures with
EtOAc, fractions collected by column chromatography, and
reference compounds were applied to 1 mm layers of silica gel
60 F254 coated on 5 × 20 or 20 × 20 cm glass plates (Merck).
The chromatograms were developed with either CHCl3-MeOH
(9:1, v/v) or butanol-acetic acid-H2O (12:3:5, v/v/v) and air-
dried. The plates were viewed under UV light (254 nm) to
detect fluorescence-quenching zones and heated at 80 °C after
spraying with ninhydrin to detect amino acids.
Standard p-(acetylamino)-L-phenylalanine was prepared
previously:18 UV (H2O) λmax 244 nm; 1H NMR (D2O, 250.1 MHz)
δ 7.40-7.27 (4H, AA′BB′ system, major splittings of 8.5 Hz),
3.94 (1H, X of ABX, J AX ) 5.2 Hz, J BX ) 7.9 Hz), 3.24 and 3.08
(2H, AB of ABX, J AX ) 5.2 Hz, J BX ) 7.9 Hz, J AB ) 14.6 Hz),
2.15 (3H, s); 13C NMR (D2O spiked with acetone-d6, 100.6 MHz)
δ 175.7, 173.8, 137.8 (C1′), 133.8 (C4′), 131.4 (C2′,C6′), 123.3
(C3′,C5′), 57.6 (C2), 37.7 (C3), 24.3 (CH3); 1H-1H NOESY
correlation (D2O, 250.1 MHz) δ 2.15 (s, 3H)/7.39 apparent d,
1H) and 7.29 (apparent d, 1H); ESI+MS (MeOH-H2O, 1:1,
trace HCO2H, 30 µL/min, 15 V cone) m/z 223 [M + H]+; CID
of m/z 223 (30 eV) m/z 206 (41), 177 (100), 164 (48).
p-(Acetyla m in o)ben zyl Alcoh ol (13). UV (MeOH) λmax
246 nm; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 250.1 MHz) δ 7.53-7.28 (4H,
AA′BB′ system, major splittings of 8.6 Hz), 4.55 (2H, s), 2.12
(3H, s); partial 13C NMR (CD3OD, 100.6 MHz) δ 128.6
(C2,C6), 121.1 (C3,C5), 64.9 (CH2OH), 23.8 (CH3); APCI+MS
(MeOH, 50 µL/min, 15 V cone) m/z 166 [M + H]+; CID of m/z
166 (30 eV) m/z 148 (9), 136 (40), 106 (24), 94 (100), 77 (12),
43 (19), 31 (15); HREIMS m/z 165.0791 (calcd for C9H11NO2,
165.0790).
Syn th esis of 13. Thionyl chloride (0.052 mL, 0.7 mmol) was
added to a mixture of p-acetamidobenzoic acid (0.105 g, 0.58
mmol), DMF (5 µL, 0.06 mmol), and THF (15 mL) under N2 in
a 10 mL flask fitted with a CaCl2 drying tube. After stirring
at ambient temperature overnight, the mixture was concen-
trated by vacuum distillation. The pale yellow, solid residue
of 4-(acetylamino)benzoyl chloride was dissolved in THF (5 mL)
and added to a suspension of NaBH4-Alox38 (1 g) in THF (15
mL) in a flask fitted with a CaCl2 drying tube. The reaction
mixture was stirred at ambient temperature overnight and
filtered. The solid residue was washed with THF (10 mL). The
wash and the filtrate from the reaction mixture were com-
bined, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in
vacuo. The residue was sublimed, yielding a white solid (40
mg, 42%): mp 118.5-119 °C [lit.42 119-122 °C]; UV (MeOH)
λmax 246 nm; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 250.1 MHz) δ 7.53-7.27 (4H,
AA′BB′ system, major splittings of 8.6 Hz), 4.55 (2H, s,), 2.11
(3H, s); 13C NMR (CD3OD, 62.9 MHz) δ 171.6 (NHCdO), 139.1,
138.5, 128.6 (C2,C6), 121.1 (C3,C5), 64.9 (CH2), 23.8 (CH3);
APCI+MS (MeOH, 0.2 mL/min, 15 V cone) m/z 166 [M + H]+;
CID of m/z 166 (35 eV) m/z 148 (1), 136 (33), 106 (26), 94 (100),
77 (13), 43 (13), 31 (17).
p-(Acetyla m in o)ben zoic Acid (14). The isolated metabo-
lite was purified by preparative-layer chromatography (silica
gel, toluene-acetic acid-H2O, 20:6:0.2). After development,
the fluorescence-quenching band at Rf 0.25 was eluted into
dry CH3CN, which was removed in vacuo to yield a white
solid: UV (MeOH) λmax 264 nm; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 250.1 MHz)
δ 7.99-7.65 (4H, AA′BB′ system, major splittings of 8.9 Hz),
2.15 (3H, s); partial 13C NMR (CD3OD, 100.6 MHz) δ 131.7
(C2,C6), 120.1 (C3,C5), 24.0 (CH3); APCI+MS (MeOH, 0.2 mL/
min, 25 V cone) m/z 180 [M + H]+; CID of m/z 180 (30 eV) m/z
138 (14), 94 (100), 77 (41), 43 (45)); HREIMS m/z 179.0588
(calcd for C9H9NO3, 179.0582).
Extr a ction a n d Isola tion . Cultures (typically 500 mL total
volume) were filtered to remove the mycelium, and the filtrate
at pH 7.5 was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 200 mL). After
evaporation to dryness, the extract was taken up in a mini-
mum volume of CHCl3 and applied to a dry column (4 × 2.3
cm) of silica gel in a 15 mL sintered glass funnel;41 solvent
was drawn through the column, and substances were eluted
in fractions by successive 5 mL solvent additions: CHCl3 (6
fractions) was followed by 95:5 CHCl3-MeOH (12 fractions)
and then 90:10 CHCl3-MeOH (4 fractions). Separation of
metabolites in the extract was monitored by HPLC analysis
of each fraction after it had been evaporated and redissolved
in a measured volume of H2O-MeOH (3:1). Fractions contain-
ing the same metabolite or metabolite mixture were combined.
Chloramphenicol was the predominant metabolite in frac-
tions 11-13 and was purified by successive crystallization from
CHCl3 and H2O (colorless needles, mp 152 °C; unchanged on
admixture with an authentic specimen). Corynecin II was the
main component in fractions 14-16, but was mixed with the
trailing edge of the preceding chloramphenicol band and the
leading edge of another metabolite (see later). For further
purification of corynecin II in pooled fractions 14-16, reversed-
phase chromatography on a column (95 × 1.0 cm) of silica C18
was used with a linear gradient of MeOH in H2O as the eluting
solvent. Fractions (3.0 mL) were collected, monitored for
absorbance at 273 nm, and examined by HPLC. The metabolite
recovered from a well-resolved absorbance peak (fractions 44-
45) by evaporation of the solvent in vacuo co-chromatographed
with corynecin II (HPLC, tR 5.5 min: TLC, Rf 0.29) in the
standard systems used.
Monitoring the eluates from flash chromatography by HPLC
with the detector at 246 nm showed two dominant peaks (tR
4.15 and 4.6 min) in each of fractions 17-21, with a steady
decrease in the relative intensity of the peak at tR 4.15.
Fractions 17-21 were pooled, evaporated to dryness, and
applied in the minimum volume of H2O-MeOH (3:1) to a 95
× 1.0 cm silica C18 column. Elution with a linear gradient of
MeOH in H2O and evaporation of fractions 34-35 in vacuo
gave metabolite 16 (2.7 mg; tR 4.15 min), while fractions 38-
39 gave metabolite 13 (2.6 mg; tR 4.6 min).
Metabolites retained in culture filtrates extracted with
EtOAc at neutral pH were recovered by acidifying the aqueous
phase with HCl to pH 3, concentrating 20-fold in vacuo, and
fractionating the clarified concentrate by chromatography on
a silica C18 column (20 × 1.6 cm). Fractions (5 mL) were
collected during elution with a shallow gradient of MeOH-
H2O (3:1) in H2O. Metabolites in the eluate were monitored
by UV absorbance and HPLC (detector at 246 nm). Fractions
21-31 were evaporated in vacuo to give metabolite 14 (24.6
mg; tR 4.00 min). Fractions 41-60 were evaporated in vacuo
to give metabolite 7 (33.6 mg; tR 3.35 min). Metabolites 7 and
14 were also isolated from the acidified culture filtrate
concentrate by preparative TLC on silica gel GF254 using
repeated irrigation with the solvent mixture toluene-acetic
acid-H2O (20:5:1) to separate components (Rf values for 7,
0.02; 16, 0.05; 13, 0.08; 14, 0.13).
Standard 4-(acetylamino)benzoic acid was the product of an
undergraduate laboratory experiment:43 mp 252-253.5 °C
1
(H2O) [lit.43 250-252 °C]; UV (MeOH) λmax 264 nm; H NMR
(CD3OD, 250.1 MHz) δ 7.98-7.65 (4H, AA′BB′ system, major
splittings of 8.9 Hz), 2.15 (3H, s); 13C NMR (CD3OD, 100.6
MHz) δ 171.9, 169.6, 144.3 (C4), 131.7 (C2,C6), 127.1 (C1),
120.1 (C3,C5), 24.0 (CH3); APCI+MS (MeOH, 0.2 mL/min, 25
V cone) m/z 180 [M + H]+; CID of m/z 180 (30 eV) m/z 138
(10), 94 (100), 77 (49), 43 (45).
p-(Acetyla m in o)p h en ol (16): UV (MeOH) λmax 246 nm; 1H
NMR (CD3OD, 250.1 MHz) δ 7.32-6.70 (4H, AA′BB′ system,
major splittings of 8.9 Hz), 2.08 (3H, s); partial 13C NMR (CD3-
OD, 100.6 MHz) δ 123.4 (C3,C5), 116.2 (C2,C6), 23.5 (CH3);
APCI+MS (MeOH, 50 µL/min, 20 V cone) m/z 152 [M + H]+;
p-(Acetyla m in o)p h en yla la n in e (7): UV (H2O) λmax 242
nm; 1H NMR (D2O, 250.1 MHz) δ 7.40-7.27 (4H, AA′BB′
system, major splittings of 8.2 Hz), 3.96 (1H, X of ABX, J AX
5.2 Hz, J BX ) 7.6 Hz), 3.25 and 3.09 (2H, AB of ABX, J AX
)
)