Dibenzotetraphenylperiflanthene
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 118, No. 10, 1996 2375
a
Table 1. Crystallographic Data for Compound 4‚3C7H8
Scheme 1
formula
fw
C85H60
1081.34
F
calc, g/cm3
no. of reflcns measd 12553
1.25
a, Å
b, Å
c, Å
R, deg
â, deg
γ,deg
V, Å3
Z
10.569(2) no. of unique reflcns 8339
11.565(4) decay correction
0.997-1.02
13.001(3)
R
int (F2)
0.041
0.71
95.05(2) µ, cm-1
111.24(1) crystal size, mm
100.53(1) Rw(F2)b
1435.5(7) R(F)c
0.13 × 0.24 × 1.4
0.211
0.075
1
goodness of fit, Sd
parameters
1.027
F(000)
1140
401
crystal system triclinic
Max |∆/σ|
<1.9 (Uij’s of some
atoms of the
disordered toluene)
-0.3, 0.4
space group
T, °C
P1h
-100
2θ range (deg) 4-60
Min, max peaks
(e-/Å3)
a Data were collected at -100 °C on a Siemens P4 diffractometer
equipped with a Nicolet LT-2 low-temperature device and using
monochromatized Mo KR radiation (λ ) 0.71073 Å). Data were
collected using ω scans with a 1° scan range in ω. Lattice parameters
were obtained from the least-squares refinement of 20 reflections with
1H-NMR spectra were recorded on a General Electric QE-300 (300
MHz) spectrometer as solutions in deuteriochloroform (CDCl3).
Chemical shifts are expressed in parts per million (ppm, δ) downfield
from tetramethylsilane (TMS) and are referenced to CDCl3 (7.24 ppm)
as internal standard. 13C-NMR spectra were recorded on a General
Electric QE-300 (75 MHz) instrument as solutions in CDCl3 unless
otherwise indicated. Exact mass determinations were obtained on a
VG analytical ZAB2-E instrument.
2
2
4
23.0 < 2θ < 24.7°. b Rw ) {∑w(|Fo| - |Fc| )2/∑w(|Fo| }1/2, where
2
the weight, w, is defined as follows: w ) 1/{σ2(|Fo| ) + (a*P)2 +
2
2
b*P}; P ) [1/3 (maximum of (0 or |Fo| ) + 2/3|Fc| ]. The parameters a
and b were suggested during refinement and are 0.0918 and 0.3572,
respectively. c The conventional R index based on F where the 4418
2
2
observed reflections have Fo > 4(σ(Fo)). d S ) [∑w(|Fo| - |Fc| )2/(n
- p)]1/2, where n is the number of reflections and p is the number of
refined parameters.
to remove nonpolar impurities followed by dichloromethane to give 4
(277 mg, 56%) as a purple-black crystalline solid. Mp ca. 550 °C
(differential scanning calorimetry). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.51
(4H, d, J ) 7.7 Hz), 7.36-7.39 (4H, m), 7.46-7.48 (8H, m), 7.59-
7.62 (4H, m), 7.62-7.64 (12H, m), 7.74 (4H, d, J ) 7.7 Hz). 13C
NMR (75.2 MHz, CDCl3) δ 121.5 (CH), 122.9 (CH), 125.3 (C), 125.8
(CH), 126.8 (CH), 127.9 (CH), 129.2 (2CH), 129.9 (C), 130.0 (2CH),
132.8 (C), 134.6 (C), 135.0 (C), 136.0 (C), 136.2 (C), 138.4 (C). HRMS
(CI) calcd for C64H37 (M+ + 1) 805.2895. Found 805.2898.
The relative fluorescence efficiency of 3 was measured8 in cyclo-
hexane using diphenylanthracene as a standard (λex ) 380 nm, φDPA
)
0.90 in cyclohexane8), and that of 4 was measured in benzene relative
to rubrene (λex ) 500 nm, φRubrene ) 0.98 in benzene9 ). Fluorescence
spectra were recorded on an SLM Aminco SPF-500 spectrofluorometer,
and UV spectra were recorded on a Milton Roy Spectronic 3000 array
spectrophotometer (5 µM solutions). Electrochemical measurements
were performed on a Bioanalytical Systems 100A electrochemical
analyzer or a Princeton Applied Research Model 173/175 potentiostat/
universal programmer and Omnigraphic 2000 X-Y recorder (Bausch
and Lomb). The working electrode for cyclic voltammetric measure-
ments consisted of an inlaid platinum disk (1.5-mm diameter) that was
polished on a felt pad with 0.05-µm alumina (Buehler, Ltd.) prior to
each experiment. A platinum wire served as a counter electrode and
a silver wire was utilized as a quasi-reference electrode. All potentials
are reported versus SCE and were calibrated by the addition of ferrocene
as an internal standard using E°(Fc/Fc+) ) 0.424 V vs SCE. Potentials
are reported as half-wave values unless otherwise indicated.
X-ray Experimental for C64H36‚3C7H8. Crystals grew as long, thin
red needles from toluene. The data crystal was a needle of approximate
dimensions 0.13 × 0.24 × 1.4 mm. The data were collected at 173 K
on a Siemens P4 diffractometer, equipped with a Nicolet LT-2 low-
temperature device and using a graphite monochromator with Mo KR
radiation (λ ) 0.71073 Å). Details of crystal data, data collection,
and structure refinement are listed in Table 1. Three reflections (0,2,2;
2,5,-4; 4,-2,0) were remeasured every 97 reflections to monitor
instrument and crystal stability. A smoothed curve of the intensities
of these check reflections was used to scale the data. The scaling factor
ranged from 0.997 to 1.02. The data were corrected for Lp effects but
not absorption. Data reduction and decay correction were performed
using the SHELXTL/PC software package.13 The structure was solved
by direct methods and refined by full-matrix least-squares13 on F14 with
anisotropic thermal parameters for the non-H atoms. The hydrogen
atoms were calculated in idealized positions (C-H 0.96 Å) with
isotropic temperature factors set to 1.2 × Ueq of the attached atom.
The polyaromatic molecule lies around an inversion center and
crystallizes with 3 molecules of toluene solvate in the unit cell. One
molecule of toluene lies in disorder about an inversion center. The
geometry for this molecule, C1b-C7b, was idealized with C-C bond
Chronoamperometric data were recorded on the BAS 100A system
using a platinum microelectrode (25-µm diameter), and the data were
analyzed as previously described.10 The ECL efficiency of 4 was
measured in benzene-acetonitrile (9:1) solution, using Ru(bpy)3(ClO4)2
in the same solvent mixture as a standard and assuming φECL(Ru(bpy)-
2+) ) 0.050.11 Apparatus and methodologies for the measurement of
3
ECL spectra and ECL efficiencies have been previously reported.12
Synthesis of Dibenzo{[f,f′]-4,4′,7,7′-tetraphenyl}diindeno[1,2,3-
cd:1′,2′,3′-lm]perylene or Dibenzotetraphenylperiflanthene (4). A
mixture of (7,12-diphenyl)benzo[k]fluoranthene (3, 500 mg, 1.24 mmol)
and cobalt trifluoride (758 mg, 6.53 mmol) in anhydrous trifluoroacetic
acid (20 mL) was heated at reflux for 36 h. Upon cooling, the solution
was diluted with water and extracted with dichloromethane (3 × 100
mL). After washing the dichloromethane extracts with water and
saturated brine solution, the extracts were dried (MgSO4) and evaporated
in vacuo to give a black solid. The solid was purified by chromatog-
raphy over neutral alumina eluting with 10% dichloromethane/hexanes
2
2
lengths fixed at 1.395 Å. The function, ∑w(|Fo| - |Fc| )2, was
minimized, where w ) 1/[(σ(Fo))2 + (0.0918*P)2 + (0.3572P)] and P
2
2
) (|Fo| + 2|Fc| )/3. The data were corrected for secondary extinction
effects. The correction takes the following form: Fcorr ) kFc/[1 +
[8(2) × 10-6]Fc2λ3/sin(2θ)]0.25, where k is the overall scale factor.
Neutral atom scattering factors and values used to calculate the linear
absorption coefficient are from the International Tables for X-ray
Crystallography (1990).15 Other computer programs used in this work
(8) Eaton, D. F. Pure Appl. Chem. 1988, 60, 1107.
(9) Stevens, B.; Algar, B. E. J. Phys. Chem. 1968, 72, 2582.
(10) Denuault, G.; Mirkin, M. V.; Bard, A. J. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1991,
308, 27.
(11) (a) Tokel-Takvoryan, N. E.; Hemingway, R. E.; Bard, A. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 6582. (b) Itoh, K.; Honda, K. Chem. Lett. 1979, 99.
(c) Wallace, W. L.; Bard, A. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1979, 83, 1350. (d) Glass,
R. S.; Faulkner, L. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1981, 85, 1159.
(12) McCord, P.; Bard, A. J. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1991, 318, 91.
(13) Sheldrick, G. M. (1994). SHELXTL/PC (Version 5.03). Siemens
Analytical X-ray Instruments, Inc., Madison, WI.
(14) Flack, H. D. Acta Crystallogr. 1983, A39, 876-881.
(15) International Tables for X-ray Crystallography; Wilson, A. J. C.,
Ed.; Kluwer Academic Press: Boston, 1992; Vol. C, Tables 4.2.6.8 and
6.1.1.4.