J . Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4817-4820
4817
Kin etics a n d Mech a n ism of th e Am in olysis of P h en yl a n d
4
-Nitr op h en yl Ch lor ofor m a tes in Aqu eou s Solu tion
Enrique A. Castro,* Maria G. Ruiz, Sandra Salinas, and J os e´ G. Santos*
Facultad de Qu ı´ mica, Pontificia Universidad Cat o´ lica de Chile, Casilla 306, Santiago 22, Chile
Received J anuary 26, 1999
The reactions of secondary alicyclic amines with phenyl and 4-nitrophenyl chloroformates (PClF
and NPClF, respectively) are subjected to a kinetic investigation in aqueous solution, 25.0 °C, ionic
strength 0.2 (KCl). The reactions are followed spectrophotometrically at 210-270 nm (PClF) and
at 310-400 nm (NPClF). Under amine excess, pseudo-first-order rate coefficients (kobsd) are obtained.
From linear plots of kobsd vs free amine concentration, the second-order rate coefficients (k
aminolysis are obtained. For the aminolysis of both substrates, linear Br o¨ nsted-type plots (log k
vs amine pK ) of slopes 0.23 (PClF) and 0.26 (NPClF) are found. The values of the slopes are
consistent with stepwise mechanisms where the formation of a zwitterionic tetrahedral intermediate
N
) for
N
a
(
(
1
T ) is the rate-determining step (k step). In contrast, the aminolysis (anilines) of the same
(
substrates in acetonitrile are concerted, which is attributed to destabilization of T in the latter
(
solvent due to a faster expulsion of the amine from T in acetonitrile compared to water. The values
1
of k are larger for the title reactions compared to the same aminolysis of the corresponding
thionochloroformates, and this is attributed to the relatively hard character of these amines which
prefer to bind to the harder carbonyl group (relative to thiocarbonyl). There is no change in
-
-
(
mechanism by the change of S by O in T , which should destabilize this intermediate. By
comparison with the stepwise pyridinolysis of methyl chloroformate, it is concluded that the changes
(
of methoxy by phenoxy (or 4-nitrophenoxy) and a pyridine by an alicyclic amine in T do not greatly
affect the stability of these intermediates.
In tr od u ction
solvent are stepwise.6b On the other hand, the aminolysis
secondary alicyclic amines) of aryl chlorothionoformates
(
Although much attention has been drawn to the
kinetics and mechanism of the aminolysis of carboxylic
in water is a two-stage reaction, whereby the formation
of T( is the rate-determining step.7
1
,2
3,4
acid derivatives such as esters and carbonates, the
aminolysis reactions of alkyl and aryl chloroformates5
have been less studied kinetically.
To shed more light on the mechanism of the aminolysis
of chloroformates and with the aim of clarifying the
influence of the amine nature, the solvent, and the
electrophilic center of the substrate (CO vs CS) on the
mechanism, in the present work we undergo a kinetic
study of the reactions of secondary alicyclic amines with
phenyl and 4-nitrophenyl chloroformates in water. We
will compare our results with those obtained in (i) the
,6
It has been found (through a biphasic Br o¨ nsted-type
plot) that the pyridinolysis of methyl chloroformate in
water is stepwise, through the formation of a tetrahedral
(
5b
intermediate (T ). In contrast, Lee and co-workers
found that the aminolysis of aryl chloroformates in
acetonitrile is concerted,6 whereas the pyridinolysis of
these substrates and methyl chloroformate in the same
a
5b
pyridinolysis of methyl chloroformate in water, in order
to investigate the effect of the amine nature; (ii) the
6
aminolysis of the same substrates in acetonitrile, to
assess the influence of the solvent; and (iii) the aminolysis
(
1) J ohnson, S. L. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1967, 5, 237 and references
therein. Kirsch, J . F.; Kline, A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 1841.
Menger, F. M.; Smith, J . H. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 3824. O’Leary,
M. H.; Marlier, J . F. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 3300. Bell, K. H.
Aust. J . Chem. 1987, 40, 1723. Koh, H. J .; Lee, H. C.; Lee, H. W.; Lee,
I. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 1995, 16, 839. Cho, B. R.; Kim, Y. K.; Yoon,
C. M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 691. Maude, A. B.; Williams, A. J .
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1997, 179.
of the corresponding aryl chlorothionoformates (ArO-
7
CS-Cl) in water, to evaluate the effect of the electro-
philic center of the substrate.
Exp er im en ta l Section
(
2) Satterthwait, A. C.; J encks, W. P. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96,
Ma ter ia ls. Phenyl (PClF) and 4-nitrophenyl chloroformates
7
6
018.
(3) Gresser, M. J .; J encks, W. P. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 6963,
(NPClF) were from Aldrich (99% and 97%, respectively) and
8
970.
used as purchased. Amines were purified as described.
(4) (a) Bond, P. M.; Moodie, R. B. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2
Syn th esis of P r od u cts. The O-phenyl carbamates of
piperidine and morpholine (PiPC and MoPC) and the O-4-
nitrophenyl carbamates of piperidine and morpholine (PiNPC
and MoNPC) were synthesized as follows: To a solution of 391
mg (2.5 mmol) of PClF (or 506 mg, 2.5 mmol, of NPClF)
dissolved in acetonitrile (10 mL) was added slowly a solution
of 425 mg (5 mmol) of piperidine (or 415 mg, 5 mmol, of
1
7
(
976, 679. (b) Castro, E. A.; Gil, F. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99,
611. (c) Castro, E. A.; Freudenberg, M. J . Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 906.
d) Castro, E. A.; Iba n˜ ez, F.; Lagos, S.; Schick, M.; Santos, J . G. J .
Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 2691. (e) Castro, E. A.; Iba n˜ ez, F.; Saitua, A. M.;
Santos, J . G. J . Chem. Res., Synop. 1993, 56.
(5) (a) Hall, H. K., J r. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 5439. (b) Bond,
P. M.; Castro, E. A.; Moodie, R. B. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1976,
8. (c) King, J . F.; Guo, Z. R.; Klassen, D. F. J . Org. Chem. 1994, 59,
095.
6
1
(
6) (a) Yew, K. H.; Koh, H. J .; Lee, H. W.; Lee. I. J . Chem. Soc.,
(7) Castro, E. A.; Cubillos, M.; Santos, J . G. J . Org. Chem. 1997,
62, 4395.
(8) Castro, E. A.; Ureta, C. J . Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 2153.
Perkin Trans. 2 1995, 2263. (b) Koh, H. J .; Han, K. L.; Lee, H. W.;
Lee, I. J . Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 9834.
1
0.1021/jo990146k CCC: $18.00 © 1999 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 06/06/1999