V. Khakyzadeh, P. Chegini and F. Varmaghani / Electrochimica Acta 360 (2020) 137025
3
Fig. 2. Normalized cyclic voltammograms of 3.0 mM ClSePh in water (acetate
buffer, c = 0.2 M, pH = 4.0)/ acetonitrile (5/5 v/v) mixture at different scan rates.
Fig. 1. cyclic voltammograms of (a and b): 3.0 mM ClSePh at glassy carbon elec-
trode in water (acetate buffer, c = 0.2 M, pH = 4.0)/ acetonitrile (5/5 v/v) mix-
ture restricted to 1.45 and 1.8 V, respectively, (c) blank solution containing (acetate
buffer, c = 0.2 M, pH = 4.0)/ acetonitrile (5/5 v/v) mixture. Scan rate: 100 mVs−1.
−
1
Scan rates are 10, 25, 50, 75 and 250 mVs . Inset: variation of A2/A1 peak current
versus scan rate.
2
.3. Electro-organic synthesis of 1,2-diphenyldiselane (DPhDSe)
0 ml of a mixture of acetonitrile/aqueous phosphate buffer so-
8
lution (c=0.2 M, pH=6.0) consisting of 0.25 mmol ClSePh was elec-
trolyzed in a divided cell by exerting the potential of -1.2 V. The
synthesis was performed under bubbling N2 gas during electroly-
sis. When the electrolysis was terminated, the cell was placed un-
der room atmosphere for an hour. After that, a yellow solid was
filtered and was washed several times with water. No further pu-
rification was exerted to characterize it using spectroscopic meth-
ods.
Characteristics of DPhDSe: M.p. = decomposition at 180 °C.
Yield: 85%, 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d ) δ = 7.31–7.38 (m, 6H,
6
Ar-H), 7.65 (d, 4H, Ar-H), 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d ) δ = 128.4.
6
1
29.9, 130.4, 131.3 ppm. IR(KBr) ν = 662, 685, 732, 1081, 1433,
1471, 1569. MS (EI) m/z (relative intensity): 51 (50), 77 (50), 154
(
100), 234 (53), 313 (7).
Fig. 3. Cyclic voltammograms of 3.0 mM ClSePh at glassy carbon electrode in ace-
tonitrile/buffered solutions with various pHs of 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 with the same ionic
strength (0.2 M) (5/5 v/v) respectively. Scan rate: 25 mVs 1.
−
3
. Results and discussion
3
.1. Electrochemical oxidation of ClSePh
controlled electrode process; (c) the ratio of A /A1 peaks (inset of
2
To attain thoroughly analyze of the electrochemical process of
Fig. 2) decreases upon increasing scan rate. In the EE mechanism,
the current of the redox signals does not undergo a change in nor-
malized cyclic voltammograms. This fact declines the connection
of A1 and A2 peaks to two consecutive electron transfers (EE) dur-
ing the oxidation process. The independency of A1 peak current
and decreasing of A2 peak height upon decreasing time scale of
voltammetry can be in accordance with perturbation of the elec-
ClSePh, cyclic voltammogram of 3.0 mM of ClSePh was recorded
in a wide range of potential from 0 to 1.4 V. Fig. 1, curve a, ex-
hibits an irreversible anodic wave (A ) at +1.2 V in aqueous acetate
1
buffer solution (c=0.2 M, pH=4.0)/acetonitrile (5/5 v/v). By extend-
ing the potential up to 1.8 V, a quite distinct anodic peak (A ) at
2
+
1.6 V was observed (curve b). Two anodic peaks arise from ei-
ther oxidation of ClSePh during two successive electron transfer
steps (EE mechanism) or the oxidation of a product resulted from a
follow-up chemical reaction after the electrode process (ECE mech-
anism). It should be noted that the voltammogram c recorded in a
blank solution rejects the connection of the faradaic responses to
concomitants in the solution. Further support to find out the facts
was achieved by recording the voltammograms at different poten-
tial scan rates. Tracking the normalized voltammograms (current
divided to the square root of scan rate) figures out three expres-
sive evidences (Fig. 2); (a) a regular shift of the A1 and A2 signals
to more positive potentials upon increasing the scan rate can be
inferred as charge transfer controlled of the electrode processes at
the surface of the glassy carbon electrode; (b) conformity of A1
peak currents in all normalized voltammograms reveals diffusion-
trode process by a chemical reaction, the ECE mechanism (E >E ).
2 1
Cyclic voltammetric response of 3.0 mM ClSePh was studied
more toughly over the pH range of 2–4. Despite A1 peak exhib-
ited to be insensitive to proton limitation, gradually shift of A2
peak potential to negative values reflects facilitating in the electro-
oxidation. This data confirms that the first anodic signal is pH-
independent, and the second electrode process has proton-coupled
nature (Fig. 3).
Controlled-potential coulometry was performed in a mixture
of acetate buffer solution (c=0.2 M, pH=4.0)/acetonitrile (5/5
v/v) containing 0.25 mmol of ClSePh at +1.2 V into the two-
compartment cell to obtain an accurate picture on the oxidation
mechanism. The progress of the electrolysis was traced by record-
ing cyclic voltammograms up to the second oxidation peak. Fig. 4