ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
Table 7 Kinetic rate constants obtained in the nitrosation of ACPE in
ꢁ
Cl < Br < SCN , i.e. in accordance with the Swain-Scott
nucleophilicity parameter.
aqueous acid medium at 25 C. See Scheme 4 for their meaning.
K
mol dm
XNO
/
k
XNO
mol dm s
/
4 5
k /k
ꢀ2
6
ꢀ1
3
ꢀ1
ꢀ2
6
X-NO
mol dm
Acknowledgements
+
ꢀ7 a
8
b
NO (X == H
O)
3.0 ꢃ 10
1.14 ꢃ 10
0.051
7.3 ꢃ 10
3.1
70
2
Financial support from the Direcci o´ n General de Investigaci o´ n
(
Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnolog ´ı a) of Spain (Project
BQU2000-0239-C02-01) is gratefully acknowledged.
ꢀ3
6
ClNO
BrNO
SCNNO
4.2 ꢃ 10
6
1.2 ꢃ 10
900
31 000
4
30
6.5 ꢃ 10
a
ꢀ1
3 b
2 3 5
In mol dm . For the case of H O as nucleophile, i.e. k /k in
ꢀ
1
3
mol dm .
References
1
(a) J. Toullec, in The Chemistry of Enols, ed. Z. Rappoport, John
Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England, 1990, 323–398; (b) J. Toullec,
Adv. Phys. Org. Chem., 1982, 18, 1; (c) S. Fors e´ n and M. Nilson,
in The Chemistry of the Carbonyl Group, ed. J. Zabicky,
Interscience Publishers, London, 1970, 157–240.
(
r ¼ 0.99
7
). The positive and high gradient of the correlation
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
indicates that Cl , Br , or SCN are better nucleophiles than
water, and the nucleophilic character increases in the expected
order: Cl < Br < SCN . This finding supports the pro-
posed reaction mechanism, even though unexpected in enol
nitrosation reactions.
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
2
(a) A. Gero, J. Org. Chem., 1954, 19, 469; (b) A. Gero, J. Org.
Chem., 1961, 26, 3156; (c) J. P. Guthrie, J. Cossar and A. Klym,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1982, 104, 895; (d ) J. P. Guthrie, J. Cossar
and A. Klym, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, 106, 1351.
On the other hand, the values of g reported in Table 6 allow
us to determine the reactivities of the nitrosating agents nitro-
syl chloride, nitrosyl bromide and nitrosyl thiocyanate. By
3
4
(a) R. Hochstrasser, A. J. Kresge, N. P. Schepp and J. Wirz,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 7875; (b) J.-E. Dubois, M. El-
Alaoui and J. Toullec, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1981, 103, 5393.
(a) J. Andraos, Y. Chiang, A. J. Kresge, I. G. Pojarlieff, N. P.
Schepp and J. Wirz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 73; (b) Y.
Chiang, A. J. Kresge, Q. Meng, R. A. More O’Ferrall and Y.
Zhu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 11 562; (c) Y. Chiang,A, J.
Kresge, N. P. Schepp and R.-Q. Xie, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65,
1175
comparing eqn. (11) and (13) one gets that g ¼
+
k
XNO
K
XNO[H ][nitrite]K
E
/(1 + K
E
). From this expression,
+
taking into account the [H ] and [nitrite] used in each case
Table 6), it is possible to calculate the second order rate con-
(
stants (kXNO) for the attack by ClNO, BrNO and SCNNO
reported in Table 7. The reactivity order found as
5
6
7
8
9
E. Iglesias, J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100, 12 592.
+
NO > NOCl > NOBr > NOSCN is that expected, but the
E. Iglesias, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1997, 431.
E. Iglesias, Langmuir, 2000, 16, 8438.
E. Iglesias, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 6583.
values of kXNO are below those for the corresponding reactions
of aromatic amines (such as 1-naphthylamine) or the carba-
2
3
E. Iglesias, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2001, 105, 10 287.
2
4
nion of malononitrile, where both NOCl and NOBr react at
the diffusion limit. However, the enol of 2-acetylcyclopenta-
none proves to be the most reactive 1,3-dicarbonyl compound
10 E. Iglesias, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2001, 105, 10 295.
11 E. Iglesias, submitted for publication.
1
2
A. S. N. Murthy, A. Balasubramanian, C. N. R. Rao and T. R.
Kasturi, Can. J. Chem., 1962, 2267.
J. H. Ridd, Adv. Phys. Org. Chem., 1978, 16, 1.
(a) H. Schmid and E. Hallaba, Monatsh. Chem., 1956, 87, 560; (b)
H. Schmid and E. Fouad, Monatsh. Chem., 1957, 88, 631; (c) G.
Stedman and P. A. E. Whincup, J. Chem. Soc., 1963, 5796.
D. L. H. Williams, Nitrosation, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 1988, ch. 2.
6
,18
in nitrosation among those studied.
1
1
3
4
Conclusions
15
16
17
In sharp contrast with the homologous substrate: 2-acetyl-
cyclohexanone, the keto–enol interconversion in ACPE system
is a rapid reaction in both directions. The keto–enol equili-
brium constant determined in water as KE ¼ 0.38, indicates
that the amount of the enol tautomer present at equilibrium
is higher than 25%. Nevertheless, the presence of micelles
enhances the total enol content by taking up this tautomer.
In aqueous basic media, the enolate is generated and the mea-
J. R. Leis, M. E. Pe n˜ a and D. L. H. Williams, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun., 1987, 45.
(a) J. R. Leis, M. E. Pe n˜ a, D. L. H. Williams and S. D. Mawson,
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1988, 157; (b) P. Roy and D. L. H.
Williams, J. Chem. Res. Synop., 1988, 122; (c) M. A. C. Reed and
D. L. H. Williams, J. Chem. Res. Synop., 1993, 342.
E. Iglesias, Langmuir, 2001, 17, 6871.
1
1
8
9
E. Iglesias and D. L. H. Williams, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2,
1
988, 1035.
sured acid ionization constant was pK
a
¼ 8.25.
2
0
A. Castro, E. Iglesias, J. R. Leis, M. E. Pe n˜ a, J. V a´ zquez-Tato and
D. L. H. Williams, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1986, 1165.
The nitrosation of ACPE in aqueous strong acid media goes
through the enol tautomer to give an intermediate, that is pos-
tulated as the chelate-nitrosyl complex, which is in steady-state
21 A. Castro, E. Iglesias, J. R. Leis, J. V a´ zquez-Tato, F. Meijide and
M. E. Pe n˜ a, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1987, 651.
+
2
2
3
T. H. Lowry and K. S. Richardson, Mechanism and Theory in
Organic Chemistry, 3rd edn., Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.,
New York, 1987, p. 367.
whatever the nature of the nitrosating agent: NO , NOCl,
NOBr, or NOSCN. The reactivities in water of these reactants
with the enol of ACPE increase according to the expected
trend: NO > NOCl > NOBr > NOSCN. In the same sense,
2
J. Casado, A. Castro, E. Iglesias, M. E. Pe n˜ a and J. V a´ zquez-
Tato, Can. J. Chem., 1986, 64, 133.
24 E. Iglesias and D. L. H. Williams, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2,
+
the observed trend of the nucleophilic character, evaluated
from the ratio of the rate constants k /k , increases as
1989, 343.
4
5
New J. Chem., 2002, 26, 1352–1359
1359