ChemComm
Communication
closed more rigid isomer 5c by UV irradiation at 365 nm. We
In conclusion, we described an example of supramolecular
envisioned that competitive guests for the capsule having geometries catalysis where the hexameric capsule 3
6
Á8H
2
O unexpectedly
that can be regulated by means of light of different wavelengths hosts neutral non-hydrogen bonding isonitrile substrates and
would allow different degrees of co-encapsulation of isonitrile sub- catalyzes their conversion into the corresponding N-formyla-
strates and thus different catalytic activities. Both open and closed mides in the presence of water under mild experimental con-
inhibitors were suitable guests for the capsule (ESI†). The resonances ditions. Inhibition by a competitive bis-cationic guest whose
of the free cations completely disappeared upon addition of six geometry can be regulated by irradiation with a proper wave-
equivalents of 3. For 5o broad resonances for the encapsulated length was possible even though the process was not reversible.
inhibitor are observed at 6.7 ppm for the aromatic residues, and at
Notes and references
about À0.6 ppm for the aliphatic moieties. Cation 5c cannot be easily
generated in chloroform-d by UV irradiation; instead it was obtained
1
2
3
G. Gokel, G. Ltidke and I. Ugi, in Isonitrile Chemistry, ed. I. Ugi,
Academic Press, New York, 1971, p. 145.
R. Ramozzi, N. Ch ´e ron, B. Bra ¨ı da, P. C. Hiberty and P. Fleurat-
Lessard, New J. Chem., 2012, 36, 1137–1140.
Multicomponent Reactions, ed. J. Zhu and H. Bienaym ´e , Wiley-VCH,
Weinheim, Germany, 2005, pp. 1–468.
in acetonitrile-d upon 1 h irradiation with an UV lamp. The product
3
was only sparingly soluble in chloroform-d but it was completely
dissolved in this solvent upon addition of 3. Again, only very broad
resonances for the hosted cationic inhibitor 5c were apparent. NMR
experiments carried out in the range À20 1C to 50 1C did not provide
spectra that were better-resolved.
4
5
6
X. Li and S. J. Danishefsky, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 5446.
J. G. Polisar and J. R. Norton, Tetrahedron, 2012, 68, 10236.
P. J. Scheuer, Acc. Chem. Res., 1992, 25, 433.
Catalytic isonitrile hydration tests were performed as presented in
Table S1 (ESI†) in the presence of one equivalent of open 5o and
closed 5c inhibitors with respect to the capsule (ESI†). It is evident
that the reaction with the open competitive guest 5o allowed a much
lower conversion with respect to the reaction carried out in the
absence of the inhibitor (ESI,† Fig. S6, 10% and 55% yield of 2a after
7 T. Wang and S. J. Danishefsky, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 13244.
8
T.-h. Fu, W. T. McElroy, M. Shamszad and S. F. Martin, Org. Lett.,
012, 14, 3834.
2
9
(a) Y. Kitano, K. Chiba and M. Tada, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998,
39, 1911; (b) Y. Kitano, K. Chiba and M. Tada, Synthesis, 2001,
4
37; (c) I. Okada and Y. Kitano, Synthesis, 2011, 3997.
0 A. Porcheddu, G. Giacomelli and M. Salaris, J. Org. Chem., 2005,
0, 2361 and references therein.
1
1
7
3
h, respectively). Conversely, in the presence of 5c the reaction was 11 (a) H. Prawat, C. Mahidol, S. Wittayalai, P. Intachote,
T. Kanchanapoom and S. Ruchirawat, Tetrahedron, 2011, 67, 5651;
b) J. S. Simpson and M. J. Garson, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2004, 2, 939.
2 D. Zhang, X. Xu, J. Tan and Q. Liu, Synlett, 2010, 917.
not particularly inhibited, giving 33% of 2a after 3 h. Initial reaction
rates were calculated and showed that the open inhibitor 5o led to an
(
almost 10 fold rate reduction compared to the closed 5c. After 18 h 13 A. Alimardanov, A. Nikitenko, T. J. Connolly, G. Feigelson,
A. W. Chan, Z. Ding, M. Ghosh, X. Shi, J. Ren, E. Hansen, R. Farr,
M. MacEwan, S. Tadayon, D. M. Springer, A. F. Kreft, D. M. Ho and
J. R. Potoski, Org. Process Res. Dev., 2009, 13, 1161.
3
3% of 2a was observed with 5o and 68% with 5c. The two isomeric
inhibitors have almost identical molecular volumes with a packing
33
coefficient of only 0.24 within the hexamer, similar to that of the 14 J. Azuaje, A. Coelho, A. El Maatougui, J. M. Blanco and E. Sotelo,
21
ACS Comb. Sci., 2011, 13, 89.
encapsulation of three molecules of 4. This implies that room for
some substrate or solvent molecules is available in the remaining
1
1
5 L. R. MacGillivray and J. L. Atwood, Nature, 1997, 389, 469.
6 E. S. Barrett, T. J. Dale and J. Rebek Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 2344.
space within the cavity to fit the best packing coefficient of 0.45–0.55 17 D. A. Dougherty, Acc. Chem. Res., 2013, 46, 885.
3
3
18 A. Shivanyuk and J. Rebek Jr., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2001, 98, 7662.
typical of supramolecular encapsulation phenomena. The higher
1
9 (a) Y. Aoyama, Y. Tanaka, Y. H. Toi and H. Ogoshi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
inhibition provided by the open 5o isomer with respect to the closed
1988, 110, 634; (b) For an example of encapsulation of a Au(I)
5
c is likely dependent on the higher flexibility of the former species
complex and its application in alkyne hydration reaction see:
A. Cavarzan, A. Scarso, P. Sgarbossa, G. Strukul and J. N. H. Reek,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 2848.
0 (a) Isonitrile hydratase: M. Lakshminarasimhan, P. Madzelan, R. Nan,
N. M. Milkovic and M. A. Wilson, J. Biol. Chem., 2010, 285, 29651;
that fits better the space available within the cavity while 5c, being
more rigid and planar, occupies the cavity diameter. This leaves more
space close to the internal aromatic surfaces and allows the substrate
to experience the stabilizing effect of the aromatic surfaces that is
responsible for the catalytic effect imparted by the capsule. A similar
inhibition effect was observed with the smaller substrate 1b that
provided the corresponding hydration product 2b in 15% and 26%
yield after 2 h with 5o and 5c, respectively, and 50% and 59% yield
with 5o and 5c after 18 h (ESI,† Table S2). It is worth noting that at the
end of the reaction in the presence of the 5c isomer, partial (35%)
thermal formation of the open isomer 5o was observed. This is due to
2
2
(b) Iron containing isonitrile: K. Hashimoto, H. Suzuki, K. Taniguchi,
T. Noguchi, M. Yohda and M. Odaka, J. Biol. Chem., 2008, 283, 36617.
1 L. C. Palmer, A. Shivanyuk, M. Yamanaka and J. Rebek Jr., Chem.
Commun., 2005, 857.
2 L. Kovbasyuk and R. Kramer, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 3161.
3 U. L u¨ ning, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 8163.
4 (a) M. S. Masar III, N. C. Gianneschi, C. G. Oliveri, C. L. Stern, S. B. T.
Nguyen and C. A. Mirkin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 10149; (b) H. J.
Yoon, J. Kuwabara, J.-H. Kim and C. A. Mirkin, Science, 2010, 330, 66.
5 (a) R. S. Stoll and S. Hecht, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 5054;
2
2
2
2
(
b) J. Xuan and W.-J. Xiao, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 6828.
the intrinsically higher thermal lability of the closed isomer because 26 B. M. Neilson and C. W. Bielawski, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012,
1
34, 12693.
of the presence of two electron-withdrawing groups like the pyridi-
nium moieties. The difference in inhibition activity is better seen
2
7 S. Kawauchi, H. Yoshida, N. Yamashina, M. Ohira, S. Saeda and
M. Irie, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1990, 63, 267.
29b
in experiments carried out with 5o and 5c at room temperature for 28 D. Wilson and N. R. Branda, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 5431.
2
3
3
3
9 (a) M. Irie and K. Uchida, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1998, 71, 985–996;
seven days with 38% and 67% yields for 2b, respectively, with about
0% of 5o present when starting with the 5c species. Unfortunately,
attempts to directly photo-isomerize the encapsulated 5o to 5c by UV
irradiation and the opposite re-opening of 5c to 5o were unsuccessful
probably because of steric clashes in the capsule or by its quenching
effect on the excited state of the diarylethene moiety.
(
b) M. Irie, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 1685.
1
0 V. A. Migulin, M. M. Krayushkin, V. A. Barachevsky, O. I. Kobeleva,
T. M. Valova and K. A. Lyssenko, J. Org. Chem., 2012, 77, 332.
1 W. R. Browne, J. J. D. de Jong, T. Kudernac, M. Walko, L. N. Lucas,
K. Uchida, J. H. van Esch and B. L. Feringa, Chem.–Eur. J., 2005, 11, 6430.
2 S. L. Gilat, S. H. Kawai and J.-M. Lehn, Chem.–Eur. J., 1995, 1, 275.
33 S. Mecozzi and J. Rebek Jr., Chem.–Eur. J., 1998, 4, 1016.
5
324 Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 5322--5324
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013