K. Akhbari et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 693 (2008) 257–262
261
solution was measured. Then a known amount of the con-
Appendix A. Supplementary material
centrated solution of ligand (TSÀ) in DMF (5.0 · 10À3 M)
was added in a stepwise manner using a 5-ll Hamilton
syringe. The conductance of the solution was measured
after each addition. The ligand solution was continually
added. The conductivity of a 5.0 · 10À5 M solution of sil-
ver(I) nitrate in DMF was monitored as a function of
[TSÀ]/[Ag+] mole ratio at 25.00 0.05 ꢁC and the result-
ing plot is shown in Fig. S4. Addition of the ligand to
the metal salt solution causes a linear increase in the solu-
tion conductivity with no inflection point at a molar ratio
of about one. Similar conductometric studies were also
done in CH3CN solution, but also no inflection point
was observed at a metal-to-ligand molar ratio of about
1 (Fig. S4).
CCDC 659320 contains the supplementary crystallo-
graphic data for 1. These data can be obtained free of
charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre
data associated with this article can be found, in the online
References
[1] (a) P.J. Stang, B. Olenyuk, Acc. Chem. Res. 30 (1997) 502;
(b) D. Braga, F. Grepioni, G.R. Desiraju, Chem. Rev. 98 (1998)
1375;
(c) O.M. Yaghi, H. Li, C. Davis, D. Richardson, T.L. Groy, Acc.
Chem. Res. 31 (1998) 474;
With the absence of a visible inflection point, we
could not evaluate the conditional formation constants
from the spectrophotometric and conductometric meth-
ods as would be otherwise possible [29]. Emission studies
of compound 1 in DMF solution show that we could
consider interactions between TSÀ and Ag+ in solution
state, thus we would have to conclude from the basically
linear increase of the absorbance and conductance in
Figs. S2–S4 that the ligand TSÀ shows similar interac-
tions with each of the varying amounts of metal ion
concentrations up to a molar ratio of about 3 and 4 in
both spectrophotometric and conductometric methods,
respectively. These results of the stoichiometry and for-
mation studies of complex of 1 in DMF and CH3CN
solution, however, are not supported by the solid state
stoichiometry.
(d) P.F.H. Schwab, M.D. Levin, J. Michl, Chem. Rev. 99 (1999)
1863;
(e) S. Leininger, B. Olenyuk, P.J. Stang, Chem. Rev. 100 (2000)
853.
[2] (a) S. Leininger, B. Olenyuk, P.J. Stang, Chem. Rev. 100 (2000) 853;
(b) G.F. Swiegers, T.J. Malefetse, Chem. Rev. 100 (2000) 3483;
(c) B. Moulton, M.J. Zaworotko, Chem. Rev. 101 (2001) 1629;
(d) M. Fujita, K. Umemoto, M. Yoshizawa, N. Fujita, T. Kusukawa,
K. Bi-radha, Chem. Commun. (2001) 509;
(e) D.W. Johnson, K.N. Raymond, Supramol. Chem. 13 (2001) 639;
(f) B.J. Holliday, C.A. Mirkin, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 40 (2001)
2022;
(g) G.F. Swiegers, T.J. Malefetse, Coord. Chem. Rev. 225 (2002) 91.
[3] M.-C. Brandys, R.J. Puddephatt, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (2002) 3946.
[4] V.W.W. Yam, K.K.W. Lo, W.K.M. Fung, C.R. Wang, Coord.
Chem. Rev. 171 (1998) 17.
[5] S.-L. Zheng, M.-L. Tong, X.-M. Chen, Coord. Chem. Rev. 246
(2003) 185.
[6] A.N. Khlobystov, A.J. Blake, N.R. Champness, D.A. Lemenovskii,
A.G. Majouga, N.V. Zyk, M. Schro¨der, Coord. Chem. Rev. 222
(2001) 155, and references therein.
7. Conclusions
[7] (a) X. Huang, J. Zhang, X. Chen, Cryst. Growth Des. 6 (2006) 1194;
(b) J. Yang, S. Zheng, X. Yu, X. Chen, Cryst. Growth Des. 4 (2004)
831;
A new AgI two-dimensional coordination polymer of
toluene-4-sulfonic acid (HTS) ligand, [Ag(l5-TS)]n, was
synthesized and characterized. One of the Caromatic
TSÀ ligand in compound 1 exhibits a weak interaction
with Ag+ ion, in addition to the normal sulfonate coor-
dination modes. The individual two-dimensional sheets
in the compound [Ag(l5-TS)]n are almost parallel to
each other along the a axis. The results of studies of
the stoichiometry and formation of [Tl(l4-AB)]n in
DMF solution were not found to be in support of their
solid state stoichiometry. Compound 1 is one of only
very few stable monomeric and polymeric silver(I) com-
plexes that exhibit luminescent properties at room
temperature.
(c) S. Zheng, M. Tong, R. Fu, X. Chen, S. Ng, Inorg. Chem. 40
(2001) 3562;
(d) J. Zhang, Y. Lin, X. Huang, X. Chen, Inorg. Chem. 44 (2005)
3146;
(e) X. Huang, S. Zheng, J. Zhang, X. Chen, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
(2004) 1024.
[8] (a) P.F. Rodesiler, E.L. Amma, Inorg. Chem. 11 (1972) 388;
(b) E.A.H. Griffith, E.L. Amma, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 96 (1974) 743;
(c) E.A.H. Griffith, E.L. Amma, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 96 (1974) 5407;
(d) R.W. Turner, E.L. Amma, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 88 (1966) 3243;
(e) J.C. Barnes, C.S. Blyth, Inorg. Chim. Acta 98 (1985) 181;
(f) R.E. Rundle, J.H. Goring, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 72 (1950) 5337;
(g) H. Schmidbaur, W. Bublak, B. Huber, G. Reber, G. Muller,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 25 (1986) 1089;
(h) G.L. Ning, L.P. Wu, K. Sugimoto, M. Munakata, T. Kuroda-
Sowa, M. Mackawa, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. (1999) 2529;
(i) M. Munakata, L.P. Wu, T. Kuroda-Sowa, M. Maekawa, Y.
Suenaga, G.L. Ning, T. Kojima, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120 (1998) 8610;
(j) S. Zheng, J. Zhang, W. Wong, X. Chen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125
(2003) 6882;
Acknowledgements
(k) S.V. Ivanov, S. Miller, O. Anderson, S. Strauss, Cryst. Growth
Des. 4 (2004) 249;
(l) O. Jung, Y. Kim, Y. Lee, S. Kang, S. Choi, Cryst. Growth Des. 4
(2004) 23;
(m) S. Zheng, M. Tong, S. Tan, Y. Wang, J. Shi, Y. Tong, H. Lee,
X. Chen, Organometallics 20 (2001) 5319.
Support of this investigation by Iran National Science
Foundation, INSF (Project Number 84118) is gratefully
acknowledged. The Smart Apex diffractometer was funded
by NSF Grant 0087210, by Ohio Board of Regents Grant
CAP-491, and by YSU.