metal-organic compounds
Acta Crystallographica Section C
Crystal Structure
Communications
Compound (I) crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1
with Z = 2. The molecules have the cis con®guration (Fig. 1)
and the centrosymmetric space group accommodates equal
numbers of à and Á enantiomers. However, each molecular
site is occupied with equal probability by the two enantiomers:
ISSN 0108-2701
Enantiomeric disorder in racemic
cis-dichlorobis(pentane-2,4-dionato)-
titanium(IV)
George Ferguson² and Christopher Glidewell*
only the Ti and one of the Cl have sites common to both
enantiomers, and several pairs of corresponding atoms in the
two enantiomers occupy closely similar positions (Fig. 2).
Because of this, a number of restraints were necessary in the
re®nement but, subject to these, the mean values of the
School of Chemistry, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9ST, Scotland
Correspondence e-mail: cg@st-andrews.ac.uk
Received 21 November 2000
Accepted 30 November 2000
Ê
leading geometric parameters are: TiÐCl = 2.282 (4) A; TiÐ
The title compound, [Ti(C5H7O2)2Cl2], adopts the cis con®g-
uration. The racemic compound crystallizes in space group P1
and each molecular site has 0.50 occupancy by each of the two
enantiomorphs. The enantiomeric disorder is correlated in two
dimensions.
Ê
O(trans to Cl) = 1.973 (7) A; TiÐO(trans to O) = 1.930 (7) A;
Ê
Ê
1.266 (13) A; CÐC(ring)
Ê
1.374 (9) A; CÐ
CÐO
=
=
Ê
C(methyl) = 1.480 (10) A. The facial arrangement of the Cl
sites (Fig. 2) precludes the presence of any trans isomer.
The nature of the disorder (Fig. 2) necessarily raises the
question (Marsh, 1999), P1 or P1 ? Using coordinates derived
from the disordered P1 re®nement, a re®nement in P1 with
one à and one Á enantiomorph in the unit cell led to R values
above 0.10 accompanied by wholly unreasonable anisotropic
displacement parameters and unsatisfactory intermolecular
contacts; the ordered P1 model was therefore decisively
rejected.
Comment
Pentane-2,4-dione (CH3COCH2COCH3, Hacac) reacts with
both titanium(IV) chloride and titanium(IV) alkoxides to
yield neutral products [Ti(acac)2X2], where X = Cl (Dilthey,
1904) or X = OR (Yamamoto & Kambara, 1957). NMR studies
suggest that, in solution, these products and the analogous
complexes derived from other 1,3-diketones are all octahe-
dral, containing bidentate O,O0-chelating diketonate ligands
with a cis arrangement of the two ligands X (Fay & Lowry,
1967; Serpone & Fay, 1967; Bradley & Holloway, 1969). We
have recently reported the structure of dichlorobis(2,2,6,6-
tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedionato)titanium(IV), [(Me3CCOC-
HCOCMe3)2TiCl2] (Glidewell et al., 1996), where the mol-
ecules adopt the cis con®guration with equal numbers of Ã
and Á enantiomers present in space group P21/c. However,
apart from this, the only analogous structure recorded in the
Cambridge Structural Database (Allen & Kennard, 1993) is
that of [(PhCOCHCOPh)2TiCl2] (TOPZUT; Matilainen et al.,
1996); here, the molecules were again shown to adopt the cis
con®guration, but the ®nal R value was 0.089 for a data-to-
parameter ratio of only 7.6. It is striking that the structure of
the simplest member of this series [(CH3COCHCOCH3)2-
TiCl2], (I), has not yet been reported; an attempted structure
analysis of [Ti(acac)2Cl2] was thwarted by hydrolysis, and the
compound actually studied was [{Ti(acac)2Cl}2O] (Waten-
paugh & Caughlin, 1967), where the chloride and bridging
oxide ligands occupy cis sites. We report here the structure of
(I) which shows an uncommon form of disorder, which itself
may have hampered earlier attempts at structure analysis.
Equal occupancy by the two enantiomers of the average
molecular site may be a re¯ection of spacial or temporal
disorder, or of a combination of these. In compound (I),
spacial disorder cannot however be merely a random distri-
bution of the two enantiomers amongst all the molecular sites.
The short intermolecular contacts C3Á Á ÁC3i [symmetry code:
(i) 1 + x, y, z] and C23Á Á ÁC33ii [symmetry code: (ii) x, 1 + y,
Ê
z] of 1.94 (2) and 2.15 (2) A, respectively, preclude the
presence of the same enantiomer at adjacent sites in both the
[100] and [010] directions; hence, in the ab plane, the à and Á
enantiomers must alternate in checkerboard fashion. There
Figure 1
The Á enantiomer of compound (I) showing the atom-labelling scheme.
Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level and H
atoms have been omitted for the sake of clarity.
² GF is on leave from the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,
University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1.
ꢀ
264 # 2001 International Union of Crystallography
Printed in Great Britain ± all rights reserved
Acta Cryst. (2001). C57, 264±265