Acidity Vs Antioxidant Action
In most papers on antioxidant activity of natural compounds,
the mechanism of reaction 4 is not discussed, thus giving the
impression that single-step hydrogen atom transfer (HAT)
occurs, which is not always true, because the kinetics and
mechanism of reaction 4 depends on the medium. In general,
the rate of HAT (including PCET) is governed by two major
factors. The first one is the strength of the phenolic O-H bond.
The higher the value of Bond Dissociation Enthalpy (BDEO-H),
the slower is the HAT process. The second factor is the
magnitude of the Kinetic Solvent Effect (KSE), i.e., the ability
of a phenol to be a HB donor and ability of a given solvent to
Previous studies of the SPLET mechanism allowed us to
successfully resolve a controversy over the mechanism of
25
curcumin antioxidant action and also to explain some anoma-
lies in the kinetics of the reaction of synthetic phenolic
24
antioxidant. Moreover, using this approach it has been proved
that kinetics of reaction occurring in alcohols can be affected
by participation of phenolate anion for weak acids such as
26
a
R-tocopherol, which is characterized by a pK two units greater
than that of phenol itself. Importantly, other groups of research-
ers also applied this reasoning in their studies. For example,
the occurrence of SPLET in methanol and ethanol has been
1
6,17
27
be a HB acceptor.
A phenol molecule that is hydrogen-
clearly demonstrated by Foti et al. and later confirmed in a
2
8,29
30
bonded to a solvent molecule does not react with radicals (for
number of experimental
and theoretical studies.
s
steric reasons). Thus, the rate constant k for HAT from a H
It is known that deprotonated flavonoids are more potent
atom donor to any attacking radical in all solvents can be
electron donors and are better radical scavengers than neutral
0
14,31,32
correlated with the rate constant in a non-HB solvent, k , via
molecules.
Thus, the exploration of the role of acidity
1
8
eq I:
and acid/base equilibria in the kinetics of phenol/radical
reactions can be helpful in the understanding of the structure-
activity relationship of natural antioxidants. In the current paper
we provide evidence supporting a hypothesis that the acidity
of OH groups in flavonoids has capital meaning for the kinetics
s
0
H
2
H
2
logk ) logk - 8.3R ꢀ
(I)
H
where R
HB (range 0 to ca. 1), and ꢀ
of the solvent to accept HB (range 0 to 1.00).
2
represents the relative ability of the substrate to donate
1
9
H
•
2
represents the relative ability
of their reactions with dpph . We decided to study 10 flavonoids
2
0
of various hydroxylation pattern (Chart 1) to explain the
mechanism of the antiradical action of quercetin, an example
of a flavonoid possessing a catechol group in ring B and other
hydroxyl groups in rings A and C. Quercetin modifies eicosanoid
biosynthesis, protects low-density lipoprotein from oxidation,
prevents platelet aggregation, and prevents or delays the
occurrence of age-related cognitive deficits and neurodegen-
erative diseases. Many of these benefits are correlated with anti-
In polar solvents that can support ionization of a phenol, the
HAT/PCET process still operates; however, some (sometimes
very significant) deviations from eq I can occur. These
divergences are caused by another mechanism affecting the
kinetics of reaction. According to this process a deprotonation
of a phenol in solvent S:
-
+
3
3
PhOH + S a PhO +HS
(5)
inflammatory and antioxidant properties of that flavonoid.
During the period from 2002 to the end of 2007 the SCOPUS
database lists more than 4900 scientific publications with
keyword “quercetin”, and in almost 30% of them the additional
keyword is “antioxidant”. The role of antioxidant action in
therapy is still discussed (redox-independent mechanisms can
be more important), and antiradical properties of quercetin attract
great attention. Therefore, the relationship between the acidity
and antiradical activity of quercetin, as well as of other
flavonoids, is particularly important.
is followed by fast electron transfer from phenolate to an
electron-deficient radical (Y , such as peroxyl or dpph ):
•
•
-
•
•
-
PhO +Y f PhO +Y
(6)
(7)
-
+
Y +HS f YH + S
This mechanism was named Sequential Proton-Loss Electron-
21,22
Transfer (SPLET).
The rate of SPLET mechanism depends
on the amount of phenolate anion. Thus, the ion-solvating ability
2
3
Results and Discussion
of a solvent (termed solvent acity and basity ), as well as the
acidity of a phenol, play a crucial role in HAT/SPLET
Acidity Constants of the Flavonoids. Figure 1 presents
absorbance plots for two monohydroxyflavones and two dihy-
2
1,22,24
competition/cooperation.
of phenols having low pK
yield product molecules having high pK
SPLET is favored for reactions
a
’s with electron-deficient radicals to
•
a
’s, e.g., dpph /dpph-H
(25) Litwinienko, G.; Ingold, K. U. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 5888–5896.
(26) Musialik, M.; Litwinienko, G. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4951–4954.
•
21
and peroxyls ROO /ROOH.
(
27) Foti, M. C.; Daquino, C.; Geraci, C. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 2309–
314.
(28) (a) Menichetti, S.; Aversa, M. C.; Cimino, F.; Contini, A.; Viglianisi,
2
(
16) (a) Avila, D. V.; Ingold, K. U.; Lusztyk, J.; Green, W. H.; Procopio,
D. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 2929–2930. (b) Valgimigli, L.; Ingold, K. U.;
Lusztyk, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3545–3549. (c) MacFaul, P. A.; Ingold,
K. U.; Lusztyk, J. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 1316–1321. (d) Franchi, P.; Lucarini,
M.; Pedulli, G. F.; Valgimigli, L.; Lunelli, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
C.; Tomaino, A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 3066–3072. (b) Mukai, K.; Mitani,
S.; Ohara, K.; Nagaoka, S. I. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2005, 38, 1243–1256. (c)
Amorati, R.; Pedulli, G. F.; Cabrini, L.; Zambonin, L.; Landi, L. J. Agric. Food
Chem. 2006, 54, 2932–2937. (d) Friaa, O.; Brault, D. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006,
4, 2417–2423. (e) Friaa, O.; Chaleix, V.; Lecouvey, M.; Brault, D. Free Radical
Biol. Med. 2008, 45, 1011–1018.
(29) Stasko, A.; Brezova, V.; Biskupic, S.; Misik, V. Free Radical Res. 2007,
41, 379–390.
(30) (a) Zhang, H. Y.; Ji, H. F. New J. Chem. 2006, 30, 503–504. (b) Klein,
E.; Lukes, V. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 12312–12320.
(31) (a) Dangles, O.; Fargeix, G.; Dufour, C. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
2 1999, 1387–1395. (b) Torres, J. L.; Carreras, A.; Jimenez, A.; Brillas, E.;
Torrelles, X.; Rius, J.; Julia, L. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 3750–3756.
(32) Lemanska, K.; Szymusiak, H.; Tyrakowska, B.; Zielinski, R.; Soffers,
A. E. M. F.; Rietjens, I. M. C. M. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2001, 31, 869–881.
(33) (a) Pace-Asciak, C. R.; Hahn, S.; Diamandis, E. P.; Soleas, G.; Goldberg,
D. M. Clin. Chim. Acta 1995, 235, 207–219. (b) Formica, J. V.; Regelson, W.
Food Chem. Toxicol. 1995, 33, 1061–1080. (c) Hertog, M. G.; Hollman, P. C.
Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1996, 50, 63–71.
5
07–514. (e) Lucarini, M.; Pedulli, G. F.; Valgimigli, L. J. Org. Chem. 1998,
6
3, 4497–4499.
(
17) Valgimigli, L.; Banks, J. T.; Lusztyk, J.; Ingold, K. U. J. Org. Chem.
999, 64, 3381–3383.
18) Snelgrove, D. W.; Lusztyk, J.; Banks, J. T.; Mulder, P.; Ingold, K. U.
1
(
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 469–477.
19) Abraham, M. H.; Grellier, P. L.; Prior, D. V.; Duce, P. P.; Morris, J. J.;
Taylor, P. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1989, 699–711.
20) Abraham, M. H.; Grellier, P. L.; Prior, D. V.; Morris, J. J.; Taylor, P. J.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1990, 521–529.
(
(
(21) Litwinienko, G.; Ingold, K. U. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3433–3438.
(22) Litwinienko, G.; Ingold, K. U. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 222–230.
(23) Swain, C. G.; Swain, M. S.; Powell, A. L.; Alunni, S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1983, 105, 502–513.
24) Litwinienko, G.; Ingold, K. U. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 8982–8990.
(
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 74, No. 7, 2009 2701