Page 7 of 10
Pl Ne ae swe Jdoo u nr no at l ao df j Cu sh te mm ai sr tgr iyn s
DOI: 10.1039/C8NJ01680A
New Journal of Chemistry
ARTICLE
1
3
1
.62 (t, 2H, H-3, 6.3), C-NMR-75 MHz (DMSO-d6, δ ppm): 161.23 The solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and purified by
(
CO), 153.81 (C-1), 150.27 (C-2’), 140.68 (C-4’), 121.50 (C-3’), 60.15 LPC (eluent, I), resulting 2.81
g
(10.6 mmol) 4-(2-(2,4-
, mp 112.3-113.9 ˚C,
(C-4), 29.32, 28.98 (C-2, C-3), (ESI, NMR: 2.8).
dinitrophenyl)hydrazineylidene)butan-1-ol
2
1
6
H-NMR-300 MHz (DMSO-d , δ ppm, J Hz): 11.30 (s, 1H, NH), 8.82
Example 1.5.2. Synthesis of isoniazid analogue 1 by reducing the (d, 1H, H-3’, 2.6), 8.31 (dd, 1H, H-5’, 2.6, 9.7), 8.02 (t, 1H, CH=N,
Y
peroxides (mainly containing 2-HOO-THF) of an old THF with 5.1), 7.83 (d, 1H, H-6’, 9.7), 3.47 (t, 2H, H-4, 6.3), 3.38 (brs, 1H, OH),
1
3
triphenylphosphine in the presence of isoniazid.
2.38 (dt, 2H, H-2, 5.1, 7.3), 1.70 (cv, 2H, H-3, 6.3), C-NMR-75 MHz
(
(
DMSO-d6, δ ppm): 155.00 (C-1), 144.65 (C-1’), 136.34 (C-4’), 129.68
C-5’), 128.50 (C-2’), 122.96 (C-3’), 116.12 (C-6’), 59.92 (C-4), 29.10,
9.02 (2C, C-2, C-3). (ESI, 2.9).
Prior determination of the peroxide content, the reaction
conditions were first tested and the established procedure is
presented below. INH (7.543 g, 55 mmol) was added in a 100 mL
round bottom flask and 25 mL THF with 2-HOO-THF as the major
peroxide and 10 mL good anh. THF were added, and then, under
stirring, triphenylphosphine (14.43 g, 55 mmol) was added in
2
1
H-NMR-500 MHz (CDCl , δ ppm, J Hz): 11.23, 11.03 (2s in a ratio of
3
Y
0
7
.17: 0.83, 1H, NH), 9.10 (s, 1H, H-3’), 8.29 (d, 1H, H-5’, 9.5), 7.95,
.91 (2d, in a ratio of 0.17: 0.83, 1H, H-6’, 9.5), 7.61 (br t, (t, 1H,
CH=N, 5.0), 3.78 (t, 2H, H-4, 5.5), 2.56 (dt, 2H, H-2, 6.4, 6.6), 1.92
(m, 2H, H-3, 6.4), C-NMR-125 MHz (CDCl , δ ppm): 151.98 (C-1),
3
13
portions (the reaction of Ph P with peroxides is exothermic),
3
keeping the temperature of the reaction under 55 ˚C (in 2 h). The
reaction mixture was stirred overnight at ~55˚C, though it looks that
there is no presence of the peroxides by TLC (See ESI, 4.3).
1
44.07 (C-1’), 137.81 (C-4’), 129.97 (C-2’, C-5’), 123.49 (C-3’), 116.44
(
C-6’), 61.97 (C-4), 29.22, 28.98 (2C, C-2, C-3).
[Observation: In this procedure, the formation of the reduced
1
.8
Synthesis
of
N'-((E)-((1R,2R,3S,5R)-3-((tert-
intermediate 2-HO-THF was not observed, probably at the reaction
temperature, this compound reacted rapidly with isoniazid,
presented in the reaction mixture]. The reaction mixture was
butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-2-(((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)methyl)-5-
hydroxycyclopentyl)methylene)isonicotinohydrazide, 4
concentrated under reduced pressure, co-evaporated with toluene Starting from 2 mmol ent-Corey lactone 3,2-1’-bis-OTBDMS ether,
and the crystallized residue was extracted with hot by reduction with DIBAL (0.9 mL), the corresponding lactol
dichloromethane-hexane (3
×100 mL). The unified extraction (3aS,4R,5S,6aR)-5-((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-4-(((tert-butyl-
solutions were cooled in refrigerator for 1 h, decanted and the dimethylsilyl)oxy)methyl)hexahydro-2H-cyclopenta[b]furan-2-ol,
3
,
residue unified with the previous insoluble, and crystallized and re- was obtained in quantitative yield as oil, [α] = + 31.79 ° (1% in THF);
D
crystalized from acetonitrile. 8.528 g Crystalized compound 1 were TLC (toluene-ethyl acetate 1:1, Rf Corey lactone = 0.73, Rf 3 = 0.63).
obtained. All mother liquors were concentrated, the concentrate The lactol
was purified by LPC (silica gel, eluent: solvent system, I), resulting mg) was added and stirred 72 hrs; TLC (toluene-ethyl acetate 1:1, Rf
.42 g crystalized compound (Total: 10.948 g, 52.83 mmol). This
= 0.63, Rf 4 = 0.12). The crude compound was purified by LPC
result shows that, in 25 mL THF used in the reaction, 52.83 mmol (toluene-ethyl acetate 1:1), resulting a pure fraction of 578 mg
of 2-HOO-THF was reduced to 2-HO-THF, which reacted with INH.
(44.3%) as oil, [α] = +32.03° (1% in THF), IR: 3269brm, 2953vs,
930vs, 2889s, 2857s, 1661s, 1551m, 1467m, 1253s, 1102s, 1004m,
3 was dissolved in MeOH (15 mL), INA (2.2 mmol, 280
2
1
3
Y
4
D
2
1
Example 1.6. Oxidation of 1,4-butanediol and reaction of the 880m, 832vs, 773vs, 667m, H-NMR-500 MHz (DMSO-d , δ ppm, J
6
resulted aldehyde with INH
Hz): 11.61 (s, 1H, NHOC), 10.27m (d, 0.18H, NH, 4.9), 10.22 (d,
.79H, NH, 5.5), 8.80 (d, 1H, H-2’, 4.9), 8.70 (d, 1H, H-2’, 5.7), 7.85
t, ~0.5H, CH=N, 5.2), 7.74 (d, 1H, H-3’, 5.7), 7.73 (d, 1H, H-3’, 4.9),
.63 (t, minor, 5.2), 5.56 (t, major, both OH), 4.97 [(q, M, 4.84 (q,
m), ~0.5H, O-CH-N), 4.8], 4.53 (d, ~0.5H, H-11, 5.0), 4.49-4.41 (m,
.5H, H-11), 4.03-3.93 (m, 1H, H-9), 3.63-3.52 (m, 2H, H-13), 2.35
m, 1H, H-7), 2.20 (m, 1H, H-10), 1.95 (t, 1H, H-7, 5.5), 1.86 (m, H, H-
0
(
5
1,4-Butanediol (20 mmol, 1.80 g) in CH Cl (150 mL) were oxidized
2 2
with PDC (20 mmol, 7.52 g) and molecular sieves under stirring
overnight at r.t., monitoring the reaction by TLC (I, Rf 2-OH-THF = 0.51,
identical with the compound from THF ). The reaction mixture was
X
0
(
diluted with 150 mL ethyl acetate, filtered through a sodium sulfate
bed, the bed was washed with ethyl acetate, the filtrate was
concentrated under reduced pressure, put in benzene, filtered,
concentrated under reduced pressure, resulting 1.24 g crude
product (the ethyl acetate was re-distilled and 120 mg 2-HO-THF
were recovered after solvent concentration). The concentrate (1.36
g) was dissolved in 30 mL methanol, 1.92 g (14 mmol) INH were
added and stirred overnight, TLC showing the end of the reaction.
Methanol was distilled on rotavapor, the concentrate was taken in
warm dichloromethane-methanol (9:1), filtered and concentrated
to opalescent solution, left to crystallize in needles on r.t. and
8
), 1.76, 1.61 (2m, 1H, H-12), 1.49 (m, 1H, H-10), 0.87-0.79 (m, 18H,
1
3
3 3 6
CH C), 0.03, 0.02 (2s, 12H, CH Si), C-NMR-125 MHz (DMSO-d , δ
ppm) (the minor aminal isomer was omitted): 163.51 (CONHNH),
1
4
7
4
61.02 (CONH), 153.86 (CH=N), 150.16 (2C-2’), 140.61, 140.16 (C-
’), 121.56, 121.16 (2C-3’), 93.36m, 91.72 (O-CH-N), 79.68 (C-9),
3.64, 71.94, 69.81 (C-11), 61.43, 60.48 (C-13), 54.96, 52.57 (C-12),
3.54, 40.91 (C-10), 41.88, 41.21 (C-8), 35.17, 31.02 (C-7), 25.72
(
CH
3
-C), 18.93, 17.64 (C-CH
3
), - 4.60, -4.97, -5.55 (ESI 1.10). The
were not purified.
, δ ppm, J Hz): 11.48 (s, 1H, NH), 8.73 (d,
.56H, H-2’, 4.7), 8.71 (d, 0.44H, H-2’, 4.8), the isomers are in a ratio
of 0.78:0.22; 8.06 (s, CH-NH), 7.69m (d, 0.44H, H-3’, 4.8), 7.62 (d,
slightly impure fractions of (-)-
6
1
H-NMR-500 MHz (CDCl
3
filtered, resulting 596 mg pure compound
concentrated (2.19 g) and purified by LPC, as in example 1, resulting
1. The filtrate was
1
a pure fraction of 1.25 g compound
optimized reaction).
1 (total 1.846 g, 8.91 mmol, un-
1
9
7
.56H, H-3’, 4.8), 5.10, 4.95m (2m, 3:1, 1H, O-CH-N), 4.55 (m, 1H, H-
), 3.97 (m, 1H, H-11), 3.57-3.48 (m, 2H H-13), 2.52-1.65 (m, 6H, 2H-
, H-8, H-12, 2H-10), 0.88, 0.86 (2s, 18H, CH
3
C), 0.03, 0.02 (2s, 12H,
, δ ppm) (the minor isomer
omitted): 164.79 (CO), 150.62, (2C-2’), 140.28 (C-4’), 121.49 minor
X
Example 1.7. Treatment of THF with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine
13
3 3
CH Si), C-NMR-125 MHz (CDCl
X
In 50 mL THF , 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNFH, 4.76 g, 24 mmol))
(
(
(
C-3’), 121.01 (C-3’), 92.57, 94.17 minor (O-CH-N), 81.30 (C-9), 74.13
C-11), 62.00 (C-13), 55.66 (C-12), 42.48 (C-8), 41.63 (C-10), 35.88
C-7), 25.83 (CH
was added in portions in 30 min. and good THF (50 mL) was added
until a clear solution was obtained. TLC (II, Rf
2
= 0.33, Rf sec. product =
3
-C), 18.26, 17.93 (C-CH
3
),- 4.79, -4.90, -5.57 (ESI
0.81, Rf DNFH = 0.58) showed that after 3 h, no DNFH was present.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
NJC., 2018, 00, 1-3 | 7
Please do not adjust margins