104
Y. Sotnikova et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 445 (2016) 103–109
unbalancing factor alpha 2.0, relaxation delay 5.0 s. Signal attenu-
NH OAc,
4
ation was achieved by increasing the gradient strength from 5% to
80% as defined by the pulse sequence in 32 steps with 32 scans,
each with the maximum gradient strength of 0.27 T/m.
O
+
N
N
N
N
N
CH COOH ice-cold
3
R
R
boil, 4-8h.
O
N
H
O
The rows of quasi-2D diffusion dataset were phased and base-
line corrected. Pseudo-2D DOSY spectra were obtained using a
standard fitting procedure of Bruker Topspin 2.1 software. The
actual diffusion coefficients were determined using T1/T2 analysis
module of the Bruker Topspin 2.1 software. As the signals corre-
sponding to the protons of crown fragments were characterized
by the highest signal-to-noise ratio, their intensities were used
for the computation of the signal decay curves. Viscosities of solu-
tions were obtained by comparing the measured diffusion coeffi-
cient of the residual solvent signal with the known value
(4.14 ꢁ 10ꢂ9 m2sꢂ1 for CD3CN [38]). The hydrodynamic radii and
volumes were calculated from viscosity-corrected diffusion coeffi-
cients via Stokes–Einstein relation.
O
O
1: 85%
2: 46%
N
R = H (1),
(2)
O
O
Scheme 1. Synthetic scheme of 1, 2 dye preparing.
Ca2+ and Zn2+ complexation and also to assess whether this moiety
would be a suitable building block towards the synthesis of mixed
cation systems.
2. Experimental
UV–Vis spectra recorded with a Varian Cary 50 spectropho-
tometer, FLUORAT-02-Panorama fluorescence spectrophotometer,
and Avantes spectrophotometer.
2.1. Materials
Anhydrous MeCN, Zn(ClO4)2ꢀ6H2O, Ca(ClO4)2ꢀ4H2O (Aldrich),
70% HClO4 (Sigma–Aldrich) were used as received. For study of
ligands 1 and 2 protonation 0.01 M HClO4 was prepared by diluting
of 70% HClO4 with MeCN (total 0.04% water in MeCN–water mix-
ture). 2-Phenyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenantroline (1) was pre-
pared as described [35,36].
2.4. Equilibrium constant determination
Complex formation of ligands with Zn(ClO4)2, Ca(ClO4)2 in ace-
tonitrile at 20 1 °C was studied by spectrophotometric titration.
The ratio of Me(ClO4)2 to ligand was varied by adding aliquots of
a solution of known concentrations Me(ClO4)2 to a solution of
ligand alone of the known concentration. The UV–Vis absorption
spectrum of each solution was recorded and the stability constants
of the complexes were determined using the SPECFIT/32TM program
[39], a program designed to extract equilibrium constants from
spectrophotometric titration data. SpecFit starts with an assumed
complex formation scheme and uses a least-squares approach to
derive the spectra of the complexes and the stability constants.
Typically, 12–15 spectra were taken for calculations.
2.2. Syntheses of 2-[4-(1,4,7,10-tetraoxa-13-azacyclopentadecan-13-
yl)phenyl]-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline (2)
To a solution of 4-(1.4.7.10-tetraoxa-13-azacyclopentadecan-
13-yl)benzaldehyde (70 mg, 0.216 mmol) in ice-cold acetic acid
(5 ml) 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dion (45.5 mg, 0.216 mmol) and
ammonium acetate (350 mg, 4.55 mmol) were added. The mixture
was refluxed for 8 h. After cooling to room temperature, water
solution of ammonium acetate (5 M) was added until pH = 8. Pre-
cipitated solid was filtered, washed with water and diethyl ether.
Drying in vacuo at 75 °C for 1 h yielded 51.5 mg (0.1 mmol, 46%)
of a brown powder, m.p. 130–133 °C. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, d; ppm,
J/Hz): 3.52 (s, 4H), 3.57 (m, 8H), 3.70 (m, 8H) (CH2O), 6.85 (d, 2H,
Those equilibriums were used to model the data:
þZn
þZn
*
*
*
L þ Zn )
L3Zn )
L2Zn )
LZn
K31
K21
K11
½L3Znꢃ
½L2Znꢃ
½LZnꢃ
3J = 8.36), 8.08 (d, 2H, J = 8.37) H(Ph), 7.81 (m, 2H, H(30,60)), 8.90
3
K31
¼
K21
¼
K11
¼
3
2
½Lꢃ ꢄ ½Znꢃ
(d, 2H, 3J = 7.00), 9.00 (m, 2H) H(20,40,50,70). 13C NMR (APT)
(DMSO-d6, d, ppm): 52.41, 68.30, 69.51, 69.99, 70.77
[CH2O],111.70, 123.55, 128.07, 129.91, 147.79 [CH], 117.45,
143.67, 148.98, 152.21, 172.84 [Cquat]. Anal. Calc. for C29H31N5O4:
C, 67.82; H, 6.08, N, 13.64. Found: C, 67.90; H, 6.11; N, 13.68%.
ESI-mass m/z (I, (%)): 514 [M]+ (100).
½Lꢃ ꢄ ½Znꢃ
½Lꢃ ꢄ ½Znꢃ
þCa
½12Caꢃ
½1Caꢃ
*
*
1þCa )
2 þ Ca )
12Ca )
1Ca K21
¼
K11
¼
2
K21
K11
½1ꢃꢄ½Caꢃ
½1ꢃ ꢄ½Caꢃ
þCa
þCa
*
*
*
22Ca )
2Ca )
2Ca2
K21
K11
K12
2.3. Analytical and physical measurements
½22Caꢃ
½2Caꢃ
½2ꢃ ꢄ ½Caꢃ
½2Ca2ꢃ
K21
¼
K11
¼
K12
¼
2
2
Mass spectra were recorded using Agilent 1100 Series LC/MSD
trap interface operated in positive-ion mode. Direct infusion of
the analyzed solution was used. Optimum flow rate of the gas
dryer was 11 l/m. The dry gas temperature was 150–250 °C. Gas
pressure was 60 psi. Overload on the nebulizer tip was 2–3 kV.
1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 600 spec-
trometer (working frequency 600.13 MHz). Chemical shifts were
measured with an accuracy of 0.01 ppm, and a measurement error
of spin–spin coupling constants was 0.1 Hz. The measurements
were done using the CD3CN signal as an internal reference
(1.94 ppm at 295 K). Data acquisition and processing were per-
formed with Topspin 2.1 software (Bruker).
½2ꢃ ꢄ ½Caꢃ
½2ꢃ ꢄ ½Caꢃ
L¼ligands 1;2:
UV–Vis spectra recorded with
spectrophotometer.
a
Varian Cary 50
Steady-state fluorescence spectra were recorded with a Fluo-
rolog-3 (Model FL3-22) fluorescence spectrophotometer at
20 1 °C. Fluorescence quantum yields of the ligands and their
complexes were determined in air-saturated acetonitrile at
20 1 °C relative to quinine sulfate in 0.5 M H2SO4 as standard
(uF = 0.546) with excitation at 315 nm for ligand 1, 360 nm for
ligand 2 and its complex with Zn2+ and 320 nm for mixed Zn–Ca
complex of ligand 2.
DOSY experiments were performed on
a Bruker Avance
Fluorescence quantum yields were calculated using
spectrometer at 25 °C using the DOSY-ONESHOT pulse sequence
[37]. The following experimental parameters of the pulse sequence
were used: diffusion time 0.2 s, gradient pulse duration 1 ms,
h
i
ꢂDx
2
2
s
ux
¼
usðAx=AsÞ ð1 ꢂ 10ꢂD Þ=ð1 ꢂ 10 Þ ðnx =ns Þ